FACTORS AFFECTING QUALITY OF BASIC DESIGN OF THE TRANSPORT INVESTMENT CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS IN HOCHIMINH CITY

Authors

  • Nguyen Van Sang University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam Author
  • Nguyen Hoang Phuong Academy of Politics Region II, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/ne9g4198

Keywords:

Basic design, Quality of investment project, Quality of basic design

Abstract

This paper presents the research results identifying the factors affecting the quality of basic design of the transport investment construction projects in Hochiminh City. The survey was conducted in Hochiminh City, focusing on the subjects working at consultingy units, investors and specialized state agencies. 190 surveys were issued, among which there are 140 valid responses, 6 main groups of factors affecting the quality of basic design were indetified, including: Project consulting and setting up contractor, Investor, Project budget, standards – legislation, the compatibility between basic design, technical design and science and technology. The exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to assess the influence levels of the factors. The management implications and basis of the proposed solution were also presented.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1]. Hoàng Trọng, Chu Nguyễn Mộng Ngọc (2008), Analyse research data with SPSS, Hồng Đức publishing company, HCM City.

[2]. The Construction Law No 50/2014/QH13 dated 18 June 2014.

[3]. Decree No 59/2015/NĐ-CP dated 18 June 2015 of the Government on construction projects management [4]. Decree No 46/2015/NĐ-CP dated 12 May 2015 of the Government on quality control and maintenace of construction works

[5]. Decree No 68/2019/NĐ-CP dated 14 August 2019 of the Government on construcion investment cost management.

Downloads

Published

30.06.2020

How to Cite

Sang , N. V., & Phuong, N. H. (2020). FACTORS AFFECTING QUALITY OF BASIC DESIGN OF THE TRANSPORT INVESTMENT CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS IN HOCHIMINH CITY. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(6), 12144-12148. https://doi.org/10.61841/ne9g4198