CAN NOTARY IMPLEMENT ITS AUTHORITY IN MAKING AN AIRCRAFT MORTGAGE DEED?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/bqa76d93Keywords:
Notary, Authority, Mortgage Deed, AircraftAbstract
This research aims to analyze the regulation of aircraft classification in terms of material law relating to collateral law in Indonesia. In addition, it examines the implementation of the power of the Notary as a public office holder in preparing an Aircraft Mortgage deed which is mandated in the law, but is constrained due to the absence of regulation on aircraft mortgage. Meanwhile in the business world, the aviation industry currently requires capital to develop its business by making credit agreements with banks. The results showed that aircrafts are categorized as registered objects and can be used as collateral. However, the stipulation of registered objects is not regulated in Civil Code which only regulates the classification of immovable objects. Classification of registered objects towards aircraft can be matched with immovable objects as stipulated in Civil Code by using a mortgage guarantee agency. Like the registered objects carried by the Ship (Shipping Law) it uses a mortgage guarantee. This provision can also be applied on aircraft by using analogy mechanisms. To overcome this, the alternative adopted by a notary is to make a fiduciary deed because what guaranteed by aircraft is engines, not a plane as a whole, and it is categorized as a movable object. Alternatively, the notary makes a "Transfer of Guarantee and Power of Attorney Deed" containing a statement of the existence of debt guaranteed by aircraft. In the scenario of default of the borrower, the creditor is given the right and full authority to make the sale and in the deed the name of the guarantee agency is not stated. Thus, an aircraft mortgage regulation becomes urgent to be prepared by the government so that there is no legal vacuum.
Downloads
References
1. A.A. Andi Prajitno, Apa Dan Siapa Notaris Di Indonesia (Surabaya: CV. Perwira Media Nusantara, 2015)
2. Adjie, Habib, Hukum Notaris Indonesia - Tafsir Tematik Terhadap UU No. 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris (Surabaya: PT. Refika Aditama, 2008)
3. ———, Penafsiran Tematik Hukum Notaris Di Indonesia Berdasarkan Undang - Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang - Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris (Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama, 2015)
4. Afhami, Sahal, ‘Standard Bank Credit Agreement Based on the Value Of’, International Journal of Law Reconstruction, I.1 (2017), 55–73
5. Agung, A M Afdal Batara, South Sulawesi, Nurfaidah Said, South Sulawesi, Sri Susyanti Nur, and South Sulawesi, ‘Legal Analysis Of The Official Issuing Land Deeds And Notary In A Different Position Of Place’, 1.2 (2017), 195–211
6. Annalisa, Y., Murzal Zaidan, Mada Apriandi, Febrian, and Nurhidayatuloh, ‘Aircraft Mortgage in
Indonesia: Alternative Object of Material Guarantee as a Debt Settlement’, International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), 8.2 S 9 (2019), 601–7
<https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.B1126.0982S919>
7. Annalisa, Y., Murzal Zaidan, M. Syaifuddin, Febrian, Nurhidayatuloh, and Elmadiantini, ‘Is Fiduciary Deed Suitable for Aircraft in Indonesia?’, International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24.2 (2020), 2175–88 <https://doi.org/10.37200/IJPR/V24I2/PR200518>
8. Ari, Martin, and Gunanta Sembiring, ‘Status Hukum Jaminan Pesawat Dalam Perkembangan Objek Jaminan Di Indonesia’, SASI, 25.2 (2019), 155–59
9. Ashshopa, Burhan, Metode Penelitian Hukum (Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2010)
10. Badriyah, Siti Malikhatun, ‘Problematika Pesawat Udara Sebagai Jaminan Pada Perjanjian Kredit Dalam Pengembangan Industri Penerbangan’, Masalah Masalah Hukum, 43.4 (2014), 546–53
11. Fani Martiawan Kumara Putra, ‘Surat Kuasa Memasang Hipotek Dalam Jaminan Hipotek Kapal Laut’, PERSPEKTIF, XVII.2 (2012), 19
12. Gustav Radbruch, Einfuhrung in Die Rechtswissenschaft (Stuttgart: K.F. Koehler, 1961)
13. H. K. Martono, Pengantar Hukum Udara Nasional Dan Internasional, pertama
14. Hans Schmeets, Leew, Frans L., Empirical Legal Research a Guidance Book for Lawyers, Legislator And Regulator (USA: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2016)
15. Hariyani, Iswi, ‘Comparation of Warehouse Receipt, Pawn and Fiduciary in The Security Law Perspective’, Yustisia, 6.3 (2017), 649–71
16. I Nyoman Widana, ‘Enforcement Of The Credit Agreement With The Guarantee Of The Mortage For The Develover Of Residential Construction With Credit’, Yustisia, 6.3 (2017), 620–36
17. Isnaeni, Moch., ‘Benda Terdaftar Dalam Konstelasi Hukum Indonesia’, Jurnal Hukum, 7.13 (2000), 47–64 <https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol7.iss13.art4>
18. ———, Hukum Benda Dalam Burgerlijk Wetboek (Surabaya: PT. Revka Pertra Media, 2016)
19. ———, Lembaga Jaminan Kebendaan Dalam Burgerlijk Wetboek, Gadai Dan Hiptek (Surabaya: PT. Revka Pertra Media, 2016)
20. ———, Noktah Ambigu Norma Lembaga Jaminan Fidusia (Surabaya: PT. Revka Pertra Media, 2017)
21. Isnaeni, Moch, Pengantar Hukum Jaminan Kebendaan (Surabaya: PT. Revka Pertra Media, 2016)
22. Kharabara, Violetta, ‘Analysis of Mortgage Lending in Banks in Ukraine’, Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 3.3 (2017), 59–63 <https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2017-3-3-59-63>
23. Lee Mei Pheng. Detta Samen, ‘Banking Law’, Malayan Law Journal, Kuala Lumpur, 1 (2002), 339
24. Mike McConville, Research Methods for Law (Edinburgh: University Press, 2017)
25. Moch. Isnaeni, Hipotek Pesawat Udara (Seberkas Pelangi 4.0 Di Langit Euphoria Indonesia) (Surabaya: CV Revka Prima Media, 2018)
26. Mulyati, Etty, ‘The Implementation of Prudential Banking Principles to Prevent Debtor with Bad Faith’, Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law), 5.1 (2018), 89–108
<https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v5n1.a5>
27. Noah, Sidek Mohd, Reka Bentuk Penyelidikan: Falsafah Teori Dan Praktis (Serdang, Malaysia:
Universiti Putra Malaysia, 2002)
28. Purnamasari, Irma Devita, Hukum Jaminan Perbankan (Bandung: PT. Mizan Pustaka, 2014)
29. Putriyanti, Erma Defiana, ‘Legal Status of Credit Bank Guarantee in Indonesia’s Legal Guarantee’, Sriwijaya Law Review, 1.2 (2017), 128–41 <https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.vol1.iss2.38.pp128-141>
30. Soemitro, Ronny Hanitijo, Metodelogi Penelitian Hukum Dan Jurimetri (Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1988)
31. Soerjono Soekanto, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum (Jakarta: UI Press, 1986)
32. Sofwan, Sri Soedewi Masjchoen, Hukum Jaminan Di Indonesia Pokok Pokok Hukum Jaminan Dan Jaminan Perorangan (Yogyakarta: Liberty Offset, 2007)
33. Suryandari, Wieke Dewi, ‘Reconstruction Of Legal Liability Of Registration By Notary Fiduciary Based On PP No. 21 of 2015’, Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, v.2 (2018), 252–61
34. Tjitrosudibio, R. Subekti dan R., Kitab Undang - Undang Hukum Perdata (Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 2009)
35. Yahanan, Annalisa, and Elmadiantini, ‘Akta Notaril: Keharusan Atau Pilihan Dalam Peralihan Kekayaan Intelektual’, LamLaj, 4.1 (2019), 119–28
36. Yuanitasari, Deviana, ‘The Role of Public Notary in Providing Legal Protection on Standard Contracts for Indonesian Consumers’, Sriwijaya Law Review, 1.2 (2017), 179–90
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
