NOTARIAL DEED MANDATORY: TRANSFER OF PATENT AND PLANT VARIETY PROTECTION DUE TO AGREEMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/k3h4pn96Keywords:
notarial deed, transfer, patent, plant varietiesAbstract
The objective of this research is to analyze the transfer of rights to Patent and Plant Variety Protection due to agreement, carried out in a notarial (notarial deed). It also analyzes the function of notary deed related to the transfer of rights to patent and protection of plant variety. This research is a normative descriptive study, by means of the statute, the conceptual and the historical approaches. The data sources are legal materials of primary, secondary and tertiary classification. They are legal materials containing related laws, regulations, views and developing doctrines. On the basis of the outcomes of the study it can be inferred that the transfer of the right to a Patent whether due to legacy, allowances, wills, grants, written contracts or other causes defensible by statutory regulations, must be done in a notarial (authentic) deed. Meanwhile the transfer of rights to the Protection of Plant Varieties, notarial deed is only required by transfer due to agreement only, not for transfers in other forms. The transfer of rights must be recorded and announced by the rights applicant. If it does not meet the specified recording requirements, the transfer of rights is deemed withdrawn. The notarial deed used in the transfer of Patent and Plant Variety Protection has juridical and economic functions that can deliver legal certainty and preventive defense for the parties. In addition, the notarial deed has the power of proof, that is, the power of physical, formal and material evidence. Besides that it is strong and perfect evidence. It can be concluded that the transfer of patent right and protection of plant variety, for the sake of legal certainty and for verification in the future, needs to be made with a notarial deed. In the future, the procedure for patent registration needs to be immediately determined by the government in order to create legal certainty and law enforcement.
Downloads
References
1. A.A. Andi Prajitno, Apa Dan Siapa Notaris Di Indonesia (Surabaya: CV. Perwira Media Nusantara, 2015)
2. Abdul Rachmad Budiono, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum (Malang: , , Bayumedia Publishing, 2005).
3. Agus Riyanto, ‘Menyikapi Gugatan Perdata Terhadap Notaris, Aktualita’, Notarius (Surabaya, 2017).
4. Aktualita, ‘Peran Notaris Dalam Peralihan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual’, Notarius (Surabaya, 2017).
5. Andhita Fatmawati, Bambang Winarno, and Bambang Sudjito, ‘Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Fungsi Notaris Dalam Peralihan Hak Atas Merek’, Jurnal Hukum, 2015.
6. Aninditha Budi Prihapsari, M Khoidin, and Aries Harianto, ‘Legal Certainty Principle of Notary ’ s Liability to Attach Fingerprints on Minuta Deed’, 75 (2018).
7. Annalisa Yahanan and Elmadiantini, ‘Akta Notaril: Keharusan Atau Pilihan Dalam Peralihan Kekayaan Intelektual’, LamLaj, 4.1 (2019)
8. Enju Juanda, ‘Kekuatan Alat Bukti Dalam Perkara Perdata Menurut Hukum Positif Indonesia’, Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi, 4.1 (2016), 27 https://doi.org/10.25157/jigj.v4i1.409
9. Ifada Qurrata A’yun Amalia, ‘Akibat Hukum Pembatalan Perjanjian Dalam Putusan Nomor 1572 K/PDT/2015 Berdasarkan Pasal 1320 Dan 1338 KUH Perdata’, Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, 1.1 (2018)
10. Iswi Hariyani, ‘Comparation of Warehouse Receipt, Pawn and Fiduciary in The Security Law Perspective’, Yustisia, 6.3 (2017).
11. J.G. Brouwer dan Schilder, A Survey of Dutch Administrative Law (Nijmegen: Ars Aeguilibri, 1998).
12. Kuntum Chaira Annisaa, Azmi Fendri, and Rembrandt Rembrandt, ‘Notary’s Responsibility towards the Difference Found in the Content of Original Deed and Its Copy Given to Parties’, International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 6.5 (2019), 282
<https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v6i5.1099>.
13. L.J. van Van Apeldoorn, Inleiding Tot de Studie van Het Nederlanse Recht (Djakarta: : Pradnya Paramita, 1968).
14. Mike McConville, Research Methods for Law (Edinburgh: University Press, 2017).
15. Miriam Budiardjo, Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik (Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2008).
16. Moch. Isnaeni, Hukum Benda Dalam Burgerlijk Wetboek (Surabaya: PT. Revka Pertra Media, 2016).
17. Moch Isnaeni, Pengantar Hukum Jaminan Kebendaan (Surabaya: PT. Revka Pertra Media, 2016).
18. Nandang Alamsah Deliarnoor. et.al, Teori & Praktek Kewenangan, 1st edn (yogyakarta: Pandiva Buku, 2017).
19. N.G.Yudara, Pokok-Pokok Pemikiran, Di Sekitar Kedudukan Dan Fungsi Notaris Serta Notaris Menurut Sistem Hukum Indonesia (Bandung: Renvoi, 2006).
20. Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris (Jakarta, 2014)
21. Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum (Jakarta: Kencana Pranada Media Group, 2008).
22. R. Serfianto D. Purnomo Iswi Haryani, Cita Yustisia Serfiyani, Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Sebagai
Jaminan Kredit (Yogyakarta: Andi, 2018).
23. R. Soegondo Notodisoerjo, Hukum Notariat Di Indonesia Suatu Penjelasan (Jakarta: CV. Rajawali Pers, 1982).
24. Salim HS, Hukum Kontrak-Teori Dan Teknik Penyusunan Kontrak (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2006)
25. Salim HS, Perkembangan Hukum Kontrak Innominat Di Indonesia (Jakarta: PT. Sinar Grafika, 2003).
26. Sudikno Mertokusumo, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia (Yogyakarta: Liberty Offset, 1998).
27. Tan Thong Kie, Studi Notariat-Serba Serbi Praktek Notaris (Jakarta: Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve, 2000).
28. Tegas Hari Krisyanto, Zainul Daulay, and Benny Beatrix, ‘Power of Evidence of Notarial Deed in the Perspective of Cyber Notary in Indonesia’, International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 6.3 (2019), 775–84 <https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v6i3.906>.
29. Yunial Laili Mutiari Annalisa Yahanan, Muhammad Syaifuddin, Perjanjian Jual Beli Berklausula Perlindungan Hukum Paten, ed. by Yuliani (Malang: Tunggal Mandiri Publishing, 2009)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
