Mentalization and Reflective Functioning: Emergence and Development in clinical psychology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/be9sbk85Keywords:
mentalization, reflective functioning, clinical psychology, mindedness, empathyAbstract
This study is aimed to define and explore the emergence and development of mentalization and reflective functioning. Reflective functioning is referred to the psychological processes that are substantial for mentalizing. This is a review study. As results, mentalization and reflective functioning are different from other terms relating to understanding the mental states such as thoughts, feelings, desires or goals. Moreover, mentalization and reflective functioning are different as a matter of evaluating this characteristic. Deficit in mentalizing and reflective functioning results in fundamental interpersonal problems. Since mentalization or reflective functioning is a capacity that one is forming and developing from birth through the relationship with others and its deficit undermine the disturbances, it is crucial to be considered in research and clinical practice.
Downloads
References
Baron–Cohen S, Tager–Flusberg H, & Cohen D J. Understanding other minds: Perspectives from autism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (1993).
[2] Fonagy P, Target M. Attachment and reflective function: Their role in self-organization. Development and psychopathology. 1997 Dec;9(4):679-700.
[3] Fonagy, P. (1989). On tolerating mental states: Theory of mind in borderline personality. Bulletin of the Anna Freud Centre, 12(2), 91-115.
[4] Morton, J., & Frith, U. (1995). Causal modeling: A structural approach to developmental psychology. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology. Vol. 1: Theory and methods (pp. 357–390). New York: John Wiley.
[5] Fonagy, P., & Target, M. (1995). Towards understanding violence: The use of the body and the role of the father. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 76, 487–502.
[6] Freud, S. (1895). Project for a scientific psychology. Standard Edition, 1, 295–397. London: Hogarth Press.
[7] Winnicott, D. W. (1951/1987). Transitional objects and transitional phenomena. In: D. W. Winnicott. Through Paediatrics to Psycho-Analysis. London: Hogarth Press, pp. 229–242.
[8] Marty, P. (1968). A major process of somatization: The progressive disorganization. Internat. J. Psychoanal., 49, 246–249.
[9] Marty, P. (1990). La Psychosomatique de l’Adulte. (Trans. title: Adult Psychosomatics) Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
[10] Luquet, P. (2002). Les Niveaux de Pensée. (Trans. title: The levels of thought), Paris: Presses Univ. France.
[11] Allen, J. G., & Fonagy, P. (2006). The handbook of mentalization-based treatment. John Wiley & Sons, 42.
[12] Moran, R. (2001). Authority and Estrangement: An Essay on Self-Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
[13] Handeland, T. B. (2017). Certain and Uncertain Reflective Functioning in Mothers with Substance Use Disorder: Investigating the Associations between Reflective Functioning, Trauma and Executive Functions (Master's thesis).
[14] Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond Modularity: A Developmental Perspective on Cognitive Science.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
[15] Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: Bradford.
[16] Rogers, C. R. (1951). Client-Centered Therapy: Its Current Practice, Implications, and Theory. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
[17] Eisenberg, N., Losoya, S. & Spinrad, T. (2003). Affect and prosocial responding. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer & H. H. Goldsmith (eds), Handbook of Affective Science (pp. 787–803). New York: Oxford University Press.
[18] Preston, S. D. & de Waal, F. B. M. (2002). Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 1–20.
[19] Mayer, J. D., Caruso, D. R. & Salovey, P. (2000). Emotional intelligence meets traditional standards for intelligence. Intelligence, 27, 267–298.
[20] McCallum, M. & Piper, W. E. (1996). Psychological mindedness. Psychiatry, 59, 48–63.
[21] Hahn, T. N. (1975). The Miracle of Mindfulness: A Manual on Meditation. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
[22] Brown, K. W. & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 822–848.
[23] Scanlon, T. M. (1998). WhatWe Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[24] Searle, J. R. (2001). Rationality in Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[25] Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.
[26] McGinn, C. (2004). Mindsight: Image, Dream, Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[27] Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
[28] Heal, J. (2003). Mind, Reason and Imagination. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[29] Bowlby, J. (1956). Mother-child separation.
[30] Phillips, A. (1988). Winnicott. London: Fontana Press.
[31] Fonagy, P., Target, M., Gergely, G., Allen, J. G., & Bateman, A. (2003b). The developmental roots of borderline personality disorder in early attachment relationships: A theory and some evidence. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 23, 412–459.
[32] Schore, A. (1997). Affect regulation and the origin of the self: The neurobiology of emotional development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
[33] Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Clinical applications of attachment theory. London: Routledge.
[34] Jacobsen, T., & Hofmann, V. (1997). Children’s attachment representations: Longitudinal relations to school behavior and academic competency in middle childhood and adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 33(4), 703 – 710.
[35] Jacobsen, T., Huss, M., Fendrich, M., Kruesi, M. J. P., & Ziegenhain, U. (1997). Children’s ability to delay gratification: Longitudinal relations to mother – child attachment. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 158, 411 – 426.
[36] Bokhorst, C. L., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Fearon, R. M., van Ijzendoorn, M. H., Fonagy, P., & Schuengel, C. (2003). The importance of shared environment in mother – infant attachment security: A behavioral genetic study. Child Development, 74(6), 1769 – 1782.
[37] Bogdan, R. J. (2001). Minding minds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[38] Dennett, D. (1987). The intentional stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[39] Frith, U., & Frith, C. D. (2003). Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences, 358, 459–473.
[40] Hrdy, S. B. (2000). Mother nature. New York: Ballentine Books.
[41] Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E., & Target, M. (2002). Affect regulation, mentalization and the development of the self. New York: Other Press.
[42] Bateman, A., & Fonagy, P. (2005). Psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder. Psychol Med, 35, 163-174.
[43] Quek, J., Newman, L. K., Bennett, C., Gordon, M. S., Saeedi, N., & Melvin, G. A. (2017). Reflective function mediates the relationship between emotional maltreatment and borderline pathology in adolescents: a preliminary investigation. Child Abuse & Neglect, 72, 215-226.
[44] Busch, F. N. (Ed.). (2011). Mentalization: Theoretical considerations, research findings, and clinical implications (Vol. 29). Taylor & Francis, 3-4.
[45] Fonagy, P., & Luyten, P. (2009). A developmental, mentalization-based approach to the understanding and treatment of borderline personality disorder. Development and Psychopathology, 21(4), 1355-1381.
[46] 46. Bateman, A., & Fonagy, P. (2016). Mentalization-based treatment for personality disorders: a practical guide. Oxford University Press, 10-11.
[47] Marks, I., Sibilia, L., & Borgo, S. (2010). Common language for psychotherapy procedures: The first 80. Rome: Centro per la Ricerca in Psicoterapia (CRP), 121-122.
[48] Segal, Z. V., Williams, J. M. G., & Teasdale, J. D. (2012). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression. Guilford Press, 44-45.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
