Discovering and Listing of Elements of Deleuze’s Philosophy of Immanence as a Research Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/ent6xs93Keywords:
Philosophy of Immanence, Gilles Deleuze, Research ApproachAbstract
Philosophy of immanence is one of the two major currents of post-structuralist philosophy in France. This philosophy in its Deleuzian approach encounters with phenomena in a way that on the basis of which one can discuss the problem of knowledge without leading oneself outside the phenomenal world or any other type of transcendence. The problem of present study is that although Deleuze like other poststructuralists has not formulated and enumerated the elements of his own philosophical approach, since this approach struggles to find an answer from inside to the problem without any transcendence and this can also be seen in the thought of Deleuze, one can make efforts towards the discovery of a research approach based on his thought. Accordingly, this essay is devoted to the study of Deleuze’s philosophy and its foundations through the examination of the background and short history of the philosophy of immanence from the point of view of his definition of major philosophical disciplines (ontology and epistemology) and his work on other philosophers (Spinoza, Kant, Hume and Nietzsche). Then, having studied the nature of philosophical research, it seeks to show that we can search for such elements as research approach based on Deleuzian thought. Finally, it will be focused on the discovery and enumeration of the elements of Deleuze’s research approach. The authors have found four elements through which one can conduct a research: 1. Autarky of a phenomenon, 2. Univocity of a phenomenon, 3. Cognition of a phenomenon based on radical empiricism and 4. Restricted Creativity.
Downloads
References
Atkinson, Paul, Delamont, Sara. Hammersley, Martyn,”Qualitative Research Traditions: A British Response to Jacob” Review of Educational Research Vol. 58, No. 2, (p: 231-250) 1988.
[2] Cassirer, Ernst, The Philosophy of the Enlightenment Translated by Fritz C.A. Koelin, Princeton University Press 2009.
[3] Catholic University of America, New Catholic encyclopedia, USA: Thomson/Gale 2003.
[4] Cohn, Thomas S., Structure of Scientific Revolutions, trans. Abbas Taheri, Tehran: Qesseh, 2008.
[5] Copleston, Frederick, A HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY VOLUME V, New York: DOUBLEDAY 1994.
[6] Curtis, Vesta S., Iranian Myths, trans. Abbas Mokhber, Tehran: Markaz, 2014.
[7] Dave, Reedar, Deleuze, trans. Fariborz Majeedi, Tehran: Elmi va Farhangi, 2017.
[8] Deleuze, Gilles, The Logic of Sense Translated by Mark Lester with Charles Stivale , London;The Athlone Press 1990.
[9] Deleuze, Gilles, Empiricism and Subjectivity Translated by Constantin V. Boundas. Columbia University Press 1991.
[10] Deleuze, Gilles. Parnet, Claire, Dialogues Translated by Barbara Habberjam, Hugh Tomlinson, Columbia University Press 2007.
[11] . Deleuze, Gilles.Guattari, Felix,What is Philosophy? Translated by Hugh Tomlinson and Graham Burchell.New York :Columbia University Press 1994.
[12] . Deleutze, Gilles.Guattari, Felix ,A THOUSAND PLATEAUS Capitalism and Schizophrenia Translation by Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press 2005.
[13] Foucault, M, “What is Enlightenment? “, The Foucault Reader (trans. C Porter). In P. Rabinow (Ed) 1984.
[14] Hardt, Michael, Gilles Deleuze: An Apprecentiship in Philosophy, trans. Reza Najafzadeh, Tehran: Nashre Ney, 2014.
[15] Horkheime , Max ,”Reason Against Itself: Some Remarks on Enlightenment”, What Is Enlightenment? EDITED BY James Schmidt, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS 1996.
[16] Horkheime, Max. Adorno, Theodor W,DIALECTIC OF ENLIGHTENMENT Translated by Edmund Jephcott. Stanford University Press 2002.
[17] Kolbrook, Clair, Gilles Deleuze, trans. Reza Sirvan, Tehran, Markaz, 2016.
[18] Mullarkey, John, Post-Continental Philosophy: An Outline, Continuum International Publishing Group 2006. Rölli, Marc, “Immanence and Transcendence”Bulletin de la Sociite Amincaine de Philosophie de Langue volume 14, Number 2, Fall(p:50-74) 2004.
[19] Naqibzadeh, Mir Abd Al Hossein, An Introduction to Philosophical Perspectives of Twentieth Century, Tehran: Tahuri Library, 2011.
[20] Naqibzadeh, Mir Abd Al Hossein, An Introduction to Philosophy of Education, Tehran: Tahuri Library, 2014.
[21] Naqibzadeh, Mir Abd Al Hossein, Philosophy of Kant, Tehran: Agah Press, 2015.
[22] Popkin, Richard and Avrum Stroll, Philosophy Made Simple, trans. Seyed Jalal Al Din Mojtabavi, Tehran: Hekmat Press, 2014.
[23] Raaf, John, Gilles Deleuze: Ideas and Works, trans. Mostafa Amiri, Monthly Book of Philosophy, 2,2009, pp.3-31.
[24] Smith, Daniel W, Deleuze and Religion ed by Mary Bryden London: Routledge 2001.
[25] Smith, Daniel W,,Essays on Deleuze. Edinburgh University Press 2012..
[26] Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy,Gilles Deleuze, Stanford University Press 2012.
[27] T. Angeles, Moses Aaron, “The Language of Analogy in the Five Ways of St. Thomas Aquinas”, Scientia VOL.5.2 (P:107-117) 2016.
[28] Thornhill, Adrian. Saunders, Mark N.K. Lewis, Philip.(2005). Research Methods for Business Students. Prentice Hall 2005.
[29] Walker, R.G.B, The Concept of Culture in the Theory of International Relations, Culture and International Relations ed John Chay,New York:Praeger 1990.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
