COMPETENCY OF CRITICAL LITERATION OF STUDENTS LIVING IN THE BANK OF RIVER AREA IN BANJARMASIN CITY

Authors

  • Jumadi Faculty of Teacher Training & Paedagogy,Lambung Mangkurat University, Banjarmasin, Indonesia Author
  • Nasrullah Faculty of Teacher Training & Paedagogy,Lambung Mangkurat University, Banjarmasin, Indonesia Author
  • Syaharuddin Faculty of Teacher Training & Paedagogy,Lambung Mangkurat University, Banjarmasin, Indonesia Author
  • Mutiani Faculty of Teacher Training & Paedagogy,Lambung Mangkurat University, Banjarmasin, Indonesia Author
  • Jumriani Faculty of Teacher Training & Paedagogy,Lambung Mangkurat University, Banjarmasin, Indonesia Author
  • Ersis Warmansyah Abbas Faculty of Teacher Training & Paedagogy,Lambung Mangkurat University, Banjarmasin, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/xdqfdk67

Keywords:

competence, literacy, literature

Abstract

The main task of education is to facilitate students to be able to face their future critically and creatively. For this reason, schools should provide a variety of literacy competencies that are needed by students in order to face the increasingly complex challenges of life now and in the future. Of the many subjects given at school, language subjects, especially reading literacy material, are most responsible for being able to equip students' literacy competencies. This study describes: (a) the level of critical literacy competency of junior high school students living in the riverbanks in Banjarmasin City; (b) the implementation of critical literacy learning towards students at SMPN who live in river areas in the city of Banjarmasin; and (c) the availability of library resources to support the improvement of critical literacy of students in schools living in river areas in Banjarmasin. This research includes a combination of quantitative and qualitative research. The determination of the sample of this study used stratified random sampling technique. The data source of this study were students and teachers who came from seven public high schools in the riverbanks in Banjarmasin City. Data collection techniques are done through tests and non tests. Quantitative data were analyzed using the SPSS program and qualitative data were analyzed by text analysis techniques.The results of the study show: the critical literacy reading competence of Banjarmasin students is low because the learning approaches used in the learning process of reading do not all lead to the implementation of a scientific approach emphasize active students. In addition, critical literacy learning materials are still focused on understanding the structure and content of the text and have not touched on a critical review of the text and the implications of the contents of the text for the purpose of community life, especially related to life on the riverbanks, and there are not adequate literature sources available to support critical literacy learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Abbas, E. W., Hadi, S., & Rajiani, I. (2018). The prospective innovator in public university by scrutinizing particular personality traits. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 18(1), 9-19.

2. Abdenia, Arman. 2015. Practicing Critical Literacy in Second Language Reading. Dalam International Journal of Critical Pedagogy. Vol. 6, (2).

3. Abednia, Arman .2005. International Journal of Critical Pedagogy. Vol.6. No. 2

4. Alwasilah, A. Chaedar. 2012. Pokoknya Literasi. Bandung: PT Kiblat Buku Utama.

5. Ariyana, Yoki dkk. 2018. Buku Pegangan Pembelajaran Beorientasi pada Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi: Program Peningkatan Kompetensi Pembelajaran Berbasis Zonasi. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

6. Barton, D., Hamilton, M. 2000. Literacy Practices. In Barton, D., Hamilton, M., Ivanic, R. (Eds.), Situated Literacies: Reading and Writing in Contekst (pp. 7–15). New York: Routledge.

7. Baynham, M. 1995. Literacy Practices: Investigating Literacy in Social Contexs. London: Longman.

8. Burns, Paul C., Roe, Betty D., dan Ross, Elinor P., 1996. Teaching Reading in Toda’s Elementary Schools. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

9. Christensen, L. 2000. Reading, Writing, and Rising up: Teaching about Social Justice and the Power of the Written Word. Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools.

10. Comber, B., Simpson, A. 2001. Negotiating Critical Literacies in Classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

11. Cooper, K., & White, R. E. 2008. Critical Literacy for School Improvement: An Action Research Project. Improving Schools, 11(2), 101-113.

12. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, Direktorat Pendidikan Menengah. 2004. Pedoman Merancang Sumber Belajar. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

13. Edelsky, C . (Ed.). 1999. Making Justice Our Project. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

14. Edinburg Literacy Hub. Teachers’Guide to Reading Comprehension Strategies p5-S3. 88

15. Freire, P. 1972. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Herder & Herder

16. Gee, J. P. 1996. Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses. London: Routledge.

17. Gillet, Jean Wallace dan Temple, Charles. 1994. Understanding Reading Problems: Assesment and Instruction. New York: Harper Collins Colle Publishers.

18. Giroux, H. A. 2007. Introduction: Democracy, Education, and the Politics of Critical Pedagogy. Counterpoints, 1-5.

19. Graber, W., Nentwig, P., Becker, H.J, Sumfleth, E., Pitton, A., Wollweber, K, Jorde, D. 2001. Scientific literacy: From Theory to Practice. In H. Behrendt, et al (Eds). Research in Science Education-Past, Present, and Future (pp 61-70). Nederland: Kluwer Academic Publisher.

20. Harris, A. dan Sipay, Edward S. 1983. How to Increase Reading Ability. London: Longman.

21. Hendriani, Nuryani dan Ibrahim (2017). Journal of Lireracy Reseach. 38(2). 197-233

22. https://herdy07.wordpress.com/2009/04/19/model-pembelajaran-problem-posing/. Diakses 5

November 2018.

23. (https://gurudigital.id/jenis-pengertian-literasi-adalah/). Diakses 5 September 2018.

24. Hymes, Dell. 1972. Foundations in Sociolinguistics: And Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

25. Ibrahim, T. 2017. Dialog Landasan Pedagogik. Bandung: Rizki Press

26. Ioannidou, E. 2015. Critical Literacy In The First Year of Primary School: Some Insights from Greek Cypriot Classrooms. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 15(2), 177-202.

27. Johnson, Elaine B. 2002. Contextual Teaching and Learning. California: Corwin Press, Inc.

28. Katie V.S, Mitzi L, Amy S.F. 2006. Researching Critical Literacy: a Critical Study of Analysis of Classroom Discourse. Journal of literacy Research. 199.

29. Lewinson, M., Flint, A. S., & Harste, J. 2002. Taking on Critical Literacy: The

30. Journey of Newcomers and Novices. Language Arts, 79, 382 – 392.

31. Jumadi. 2018. Kemampuan Membaca Siswa SMP yang Bermukim di Sekitar Sungai di Kota Banjarmasin. Dalam Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pembelajarannya. 8 (2): 234-244.

32. McLaughlin, M. & Allen, M. B. 2002. Guided Comprehension: A Teaching Model for Grades 3-8. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

33. Nurhadi. 1987. Membaca Cepat dan Efektif. Bandung: C.V. Sinar Baru Bandung.

34. O'Brien, J. 2001. Children Reading Critically: A local History. In Comber, B., Simpson, A. (Eds.), Negotiating Critical Literacies in Classrooms (pp. 37–54). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

35. Priyatmi, Endah Tri dan Nurhadi. 2017. Memabaca/Literasi Kritis. Tangerang: Tira Smart.

36. Robandi, B., Kesuma, D., Riyadi, A. R., & Ibrahim, T. 2017. The Profile of Critical Consciousness at Indonesia University of Education St.

37. Santosa, Puji, dkk. 2008. Materi dan Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia SD. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.

38. Setiawati, Wiwik dkk. 2018. Buku Penilaian Berorientasi Higher Order Thinking Skills: Program Peningkatan Kompetensi Pembelajaran Berbasis Zonasi. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

39. Street, B. V. 1995. Social Literacies: Critical Approaches to Literacy Development, Ethnography, and Education. London: Longman.

40. Syafi’ie, Imam. 1999. Pengajaran Membaca di Kelas-kelas Awal Sekolah Dasar. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.

41. Tarigan, Hendry Guntur. 2008. Membaca: sebagai Suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa Bandung.

42. Thelin, W. H. 2005. Understanding Problems in Critical Classrooms. College Composition and Communication, 114-141.

43. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. 2008. International Literacy Statistics: A Review of Concepts, Methodology, and Current Data. Montreal, Canada: UNESCO Institute for Statistics.

44. Vasquez, V. 1998. Building Equitable Communities: Taking Social Action in a Kindergarten Classroom. Talking Points, 9(2), 3–6.

45. Vasquez, V. 2000. Our Way: Using the Everyday to Create a Critical Literacy Curriculum.

Primary Voices, 9(2), 8–13.

Downloads

Published

31.10.2020

How to Cite

Jumadi, Nasrullah, Syaharuddin, Mutiani, Jumriani, & Abbas, E. W. (2020). COMPETENCY OF CRITICAL LITERATION OF STUDENTS LIVING IN THE BANK OF RIVER AREA IN BANJARMASIN CITY. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(8), 15239-15248. https://doi.org/10.61841/xdqfdk67