The Influence Training of BPSDM (Human Resources Education Center Ministry of Transportation) Controling and Work Motivation against Competency of Vocational Teachers in Indonesia

Authors

  • Kurniawan Abadi Research Scholar, Department of Educational Management Author
  • Sutjipto Sutjipto Research Scholar, Department of Educational Management, State University of Jakarta, Author
  • Ivan Hanafi Research Scholar, Department of Vocational and Educational Technology, State University of Jakarta Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/46kbk150

Keywords:

Competency, Controlling, Training, Work Motivation

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of coaching, supervision and work motivation on the competence of Sailing Vocational Teachers in Indonesia. In addition to knowing whether there is a good relationship between each variable directly. This research uses a quantitative method with a path analysis approach. The population of this study is the Vocational School teachers in Indonesia who have TOT Model Couse 6.09 certificates totaling 362 teachers with a sample of 190 teachers. The results showed the path coefficient of several variables related to teacher competence including coaching, supervision and work motivation. The novelty in this study found that the competence of overseas shipping teachers is dominated by training received in large numbers of 0.418 with the largest indicator which means an increase in knowledge, this is due to being a teacher. Set by IMO (International Maritime Organization)

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. S. Lester, “Reconciling activity-based descriptions of competence with professional work,” Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 381–393, 2017, doi: 10.1108/HESWBL-07-2017-0042.

2. R. Deakin Crick, Learning power in practice: a guide for teachers. London ; Thousand Oaks, Calif: Paul Chapman, 2006.

3. M. Nurtanto, H. Sofyan, P. Pardjono, and S. Suyitno, “Development model for competency improvement and national vocational qualification support frames in automotive technology,” International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 168–176, 2020, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v9i1.20447.

4. S. Prestridge and J. Tondeur, “Exploring Elements That Support Teachers Engagement in Online Professional Development,” Education Sciences, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 199–219, 2015, doi: 10.3390/educsci5030199.

5. K. Burden, P. Aubusson, S. Brindley, and S. Schuck, “Changing knowledge, changing technology: implications for teacher education futures,” Journal of Education for Teaching, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 4–16, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1080/02607476.2015.1125432.

6. G. B. Gudmundsdottir and O. E. Hatlevik, “Newly qualified teachers’ professional digital competence: implications for teacher education,” European Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 214–231, 2018, doi: 10.1080/02619768.2017.1416085.

7. E. Gokce, “The Development of a Scale to Determine General Competency for Primary School Teachers in Turkey: A Validity and Reliability Study,” The Anthropologist, vol. 20, no. 1–2, pp. 360–368, Apr. 2015, doi: 10.1080/09720073.2015.11891740.

8. R. I. Aðalsteinsson, I. B. Frímannsdóttir, and S. Konráðsson, “Teachers’ self-esteem and self-efficacy,” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 540–550, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1080/00313831.2013.773559.

9. M. Barber, M. Mourshed, M. and Company, M. Barber, and M. Mourshed, “How the World’s Best-Performing School Systems Come Out On Top,” p. 56, 2007, doi: 10.1007/s10833-008-9075-9.

10. J. Hattie, “Kualitas Pendidikan di sekolah.” 2018.

11. M. Cochran-Smith, “Studying teacher education what we know and need to know,” Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 301–306, 2005, doi: 10.1177/0022487105280116.

12. G. Brante, “Multitasking and synchronous work: Complexities in teacher work,” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 430–436, Apr. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2008.09.015.

13. F. Vogt and M. Rogalla, “Developing Adaptive Teaching Competency through coaching,” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 1051–1060, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2009.04.002.

14. A. E. Barnes, S. S. Zuilkowski, D. Mekonnen, and F. Ramos-Mattoussi, “Improving teacher training in Ethiopia: Shifting the content and approach of pre-service teacher education,” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 70, pp. 1–11, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.004.

15. D. Cooper and J. B. Allen, “The coaching process of the expert coach: a coach led approach,” Sports Coaching Review, vol. 0629, no. August, pp. 1–29, 2017, doi: 10.1080/21640629.2017.1361168.

16. D. Kaye, A. Mwanika, and N. Sewankambo, “Influence of the training experience of Makerere University medical and nursing graduates on willingness and competence to work in rural health facilities,” p. 10, 2010.

17. D. Ulrich, “Coaching for results,” Business Strategy Series, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 104–114, 2008, doi: 10.1108/17515630810873320.

18. J. O’Flaherty and E. M. Beal, “Core competencies and high leverage practices of the beginning teacher: a synthesis of the literature,” Journal of Education for Teaching, pp. 1–18, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1080/02607476.2018.1450826.

19. C. Zhu, D. Wang, Y. Cai, and N. Engels, “What core competencies are related to teachers’ innovative teaching?,” Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 9–27, Feb. 2013, doi: 10.1080/1359866X.2012.753984.

20. J. Colquitt, J. A. LePine, and M. J. Wesson, Organizational behavior: improving performance and commitment in the workplace, 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education, 2020.

21. Z. Arifin, M. Nurtanto, W. Warju, R. Rabiman, and N. Kholifah, “The TAWOCK Conceptual Model at Content Knowledge for Professional Teaching in Vocational Education,” International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), vol. 9, no. 3, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v9i3.20561.

22. Z. Arifin, M. Nurtanto, A. Priatna, N. Kholifah, and M. Fawaid, “Technology Andragogy Work Content Knowledge Model as a New Framework in Vocational Education: Revised Technology Pedagogy Content Knowledge Model,” TEM Journal, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 786–791, 2020, doi: 10.18421/TEM92-48.

Downloads

Published

31.10.2020

Issue

Vol. 24 No. 8 (2020): 24 (8) 2020

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

How to Cite

Abadi, K., Sutjipto, S., & Hanafi, I. (2020). The Influence Training of BPSDM (Human Resources Education Center Ministry of Transportation) Controling and Work Motivation against Competency of Vocational Teachers in Indonesia. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(8), 14792-14801. https://doi.org/10.61841/46kbk150