Hybridization of Indigenous Knowledge-Based Positivistic Governance

Authors

  • Syahrul Yasin Limpo Ministry of Agriculture Republic Indonesia, Indonesia Author
  • Farida Patittingi Faculty of Law, Universitas Hasanuddin, Indonesia Author
  • Muh. Hasrul Faculty of Law, Universitas Hasanuddin, Indonesia Author
  • Ahsan Yunus Faculty of Law, Universitas Hasanuddin, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/cz2tdk23

Keywords:

Good Governance, Hybridization, Indigenous Knowledge, Local Government

Abstract

The success or failure of democratic reform in Indonesia is a key question for Indonesia itself and for the surrounding region. Although Indonesia's transition to democracy holds out the promise of good governance, this cannot be taken for granted as the recent practical governance is likely future challenges faced by Indonesia as it implements decentralization and provide some recommendations to improve the ongoing decentralization process. This article is a normative-legal research by using statute, case, and conceptual approaches. Meanwhile, data were analyzed descriptively, consisting of quotes. The results show that the practice of governance based on rather rigid State governance laws actually need to be hybridized with local wisdom (indigenous knowledge) in order to have a participatory spirit that can encourage active community participation in supporting government and development movements. This is a hybridization of Positivistic Constitutional Law with Indigenous Knowledge to formulate the complexity of the challenges faced by a government. Responsive governance supported by high community participation is the key to what we have achieved so far. This is possible as the hybridization of positivistic State administration law with indigenous knowledge in formulating policies as needed by the people.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Mardiasmo, D., Barnes, P, & Sakurai, Y. (2008, March) Implementation of good governance by regional governments in Indonesia: the challenges. The Twelfth Annual Conference of the International Research Society for Public Management (IRSPM XII).

2. Fossati, D. (2016). "Beyond “good governance”: The multi-level politics of health insurance for the poor in Indonesia." World Development 87: 291-306.

3. Potsangbam, C. (2017). Adaptive Performance In Vuca Era–Where Is Research Going?. International Journal of Management, 8 (6).

4. Kasim, I. (2000). Membebaskan Hukum, Yogyakarta: Insist Press.

5. Hunt, A. (1978). The Sociological Movement in Law. London: Macmillan Press.

6. Covey, S.R. (1989). The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People. New York: Simon and Schuster,

7. Aspan, Z & Yunus, A. (2019). The right to a good and healthy environment: Revitalizing green constitution. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 343 (1), 012067.

8. Marzuki, P.M. (2008). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

9. Nazarudin. T. (2015). Perencanaan Kota Secara Komprehensif Berbasis Hukum Integratif Menuju Pembangunan Kota Berkelanjutan. Jurnal Cita Hukum, 3 (2): 213-24.

10. Budihardjo, E & Sujarto, D. (2009). Kota Berkelanjutan (Sustainable City). Bandung: Alumni.

11. Pakpahan, R.H. (2019). "Pembaharuan Kebijakan Hukum Asset Recovery: Antara Ius Constitutum dan Ius Constituendum." Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia. 16, (3): 369-78.

12. Rahardjo, S. (2009). Hukum Progresif: Sebuah Sintesa Hukum Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.

13. Bossidy, L., Charan, R., and Buck, C. (2002). Execution: The Discipline of Getting Things Done. New South Wales: Currency Media.

14. Osborne, D., and Gaebler, T. (1993). Reinventing government: how the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. 18th edition. New York: Plume.

Downloads

Published

31.10.2020

How to Cite

Yasin Limpo, S., Patittingi, F., Hasrul, M., & Yunus, A. (2020). Hybridization of Indigenous Knowledge-Based Positivistic Governance. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(8), 11698-11706. https://doi.org/10.61841/cz2tdk23