APPLYING DOMAIN PSYCHOMOTOR TEACHING METHODS IN VOCATIONAL COLLEGE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/39mfny87Keywords:
Teaching Method,, Psychomotor Domain, Skills, Teaching and LearningAbstract
The teaching method that used by teachers will be an impact on teaching and learning process. This study aims to discuss the practical teaching methods and practices dominant in the psychomotor domain of the practical teaching method adopted by the teacher in vocational college. The design of this study was oriented survey with quantitative approach and methods by observations of the teachers who teach at the workshop at a vocational college. Purposive sampling used to select in executing the method of observation. Number of samples selected in carrying out the method of observation is of four trainers who is chairman vocational workshops. The results showed that mean for the practical aspect of teaching methods of teaching design is 3.723, the implementation of teaching and evaluation of teaching is 3.542 and 3.504. For the implementation of teaching, teaching methods carried out showed the highest mean value for the recollection, the question, answer and presentation where the mean is about 4.06, 4.05 and 4.05. Then followed by the discussion and video screenings of 4.03 and 3.99. Overall, vocational college instructor more emphasis on teaching methods to the psychomotor domain observations, inventory, motion control, special movements, mechanisms and adjustment, but less emphasis on originality domain during the teaching and learning at the workshop. Psychomotor domain of the implementation by the instructors in teaching at workshops do not meet all seven standards psychomotor domains that has been set. The results of this study are expected to provide new ideas for teachers to apply all the skills in the psychomotor elements in the selection of appropriate teaching methods for teaching centered on practical workshops.
Downloads
References
1. Abdul Ghafar, M. N. (2011). Pembinaan dan Analisis Ujian Bilik Darjah- Edisi Kedua. Skudai: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
2. Barbara, S. K., Olga, D., Jerneja, D. & Konstanca, Z. (2013). Music Objectives Planning In Prevalling Pcychomotor Domain. The New Education Review: University of Ljubljana.
3. Butler, F. C. (1972). Instructional Systems Development for Vocational and Technical Training. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
4. Carvalho, S. & White, H. (1997). Combining the Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches to Poverty Measurement and Analysis: The Practice and the Potential. 1st ed. Washington DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ the World Bank. ms. 23-366.
5. Charles, T. dan fen, Y. (2007). Mixed Methods Sampling: A Typology with Examples. Journal Mixed Methods Research, 1 (77). United States: Sage Publication
6. Daniel, M. (2010). Effective Teaching Evidence and Practice. London: Sage Publication Asia Pacific Pte.Ltd.
7. Dave, R. H. (1970). Psychomotor Levels In Developing and Writing Behavioral Objectives education. Robert J. Armstrong. Tucson AZ: Educational Innovators Press.
8. Ennis, R. H. (1987). A Taxonomy of Critical Thinking Dispositions and Abilities. In. J. B. Baron & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.). Teaching Thinking Skills: Theory and Practice. New York: W. H. Freeman.
9. Harold, W. (2001). Teacher Classroom Practices and Student Performance: How School Can Make A Difference. New Jersey: Educational Testing Service Statistic and Research Division Princeton.
10. Harrow, A.J. (1972). A Taxonomy of the Psychomotor Domain. New York: David McKay Co.
11. John, H. G. & Frank, X. D. (2001). A Simple Five-Step Method for Teaching Clinical Skills. Journal of Education, 33.
12. Krathwol, D. R. (2002) A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory into Practices. United States: The Ohio State University.
13. Krejcie, R. V. & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. University of Minnesota: Duluth.
14. Louis, C., Lawrence, M. &Keith, M. (2011). Reasearch Methods in Education. 7th ed. United Kingdom: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
15. Madar, A.R., Sun, C.E. & Hamid, H. (2019). Facilitating torrance test of creative thinking use in malaysian TVET research: The initial step of inter-rater reliability determination. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 11 (1): 100-108.
16. Malaysian Education Department. (2009). Modul Pentaksiran Berasaskan Sekolah (MPBS). Matapelajaran Aliran Vokasional. Kuala Lumpur: Lembaga Peperiksaan Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.
17. Malaysian Education Department. (2011). Transformasi PendidikanVokasional. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.
18. Malaysian Education Department. (2012). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025. Dicapai pada Oktober 01, 2013, dari Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia: http://www.moe.gov.my/v/pelan-pembangunan-pendidikan-malaysia-2013-2025
19. Malaysian Education Department. (2014, Februari). Statistik Guru Di Malaysia. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. Dicapai Pada Februari 20, 2014 Dari Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia: Http://Emisportal.Moe.Gov.My/Mainpage.Php?Module=Maklumat&Kategori=47&Id=188&Papar=1
20. Mok, S. S. (2000). Ilmu Pendidikan Untuk KPLI. Kuala Lumpur: Kumpulan Budiman.
21. Pinsent, A. (2008). The Principles of Teaching-Method with Special Reference to Secondary Education. 3rd ed. University of California: Harrap Publisher.
22. Robert, L. L. (2008). Assessment and Accountability - Student Assessment and Testing. Volume 4. London: Sage Publication Ltd.
23. Romiszowski, A. (1999). The Development of Physical Skills: Instruction in the Psychomotor Domain, Instructional Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory. Volume 2. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Sabhita, M. (2005). Membentuk Suasana Kerja Positif. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications. Seels dan Glasgow (1990). Exercises in instructional design. Columbus OH: Merrill Publishing.
25. Simpson, E. (1972). Taxonomy For The Psychomotor Domain. in Snowman, J., McCown. R., & Biehler,
R. (Ed). Psychology Applied to Teaching.13th Edition. Canada: Wardworth cengage lerning.
26. Tan, A. M. (2010). Panduan Pentaksiran Berasaskan Sekolah Dalam Bilik Darjah.Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia: Gerak Budaya Enterprise.
27. Yunos, J. M., Rubani, S. N. K., Alias, M., Sumarwati, S., Yunus, F. A. N., Hamid, H. & Rizal, F. Vocational pedagogical decisions of Malaysian and Indonesian non-engineering TVET teachers. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 2019, 11 (3).
28. Zulhelmi, A. (2009). Penilaian Psikomotor Dan Respon Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran Sains Fisika Melalui Penerapan Penemuan Terbimbing Di Smp Negeri 20 Pekanbaru. Jurnal Geliga Sains, 3 (2), ms 8-13.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
