Some aspects of civil and arbitrary proceeding in EU law practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/7jnv2x80Keywords:
arbitration, court, arbitration process, European Union.Abstract
The article is devoted to the consideration of certain aspects of the civil and arbitration process in the European Union. The author analyzed the concept of European civil and arbitration law, highlighted the significant difference between the two processes in the EU, identified the leading principles for the implementation of arbitration. The analysis of the advantages of the European Union arbitration institutions is carried out, on the basis of which the advantages of the arbitration procedure are identified, at the same time, the shortcomings of the European arbitration are realistically considered.
The relevance of the research topic is due to the ongoing changes in the system of pan-European and national law, which relate to civil and arbitration legislation. Possession of information on current changes and stages of development of European arbitration makes it possible to monitor the state of the Russian arbitration system in order to highlight the main shortcomings and further correct them.
Objective: to highlight the difference and similarity of certain aspects of the civil and arbitration processes.
Research methods: analysis of the scientific literature on the problem, deduction, induction, comparison, analogy.
Downloads
References
1. Y.V. Ragulina, E.I. Semenova, I.A. Zueva, E.V. Kletskova, E.N. Belkina, Perspectives of solving the problems of regional development with the help of new internet technologies, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues (2018) Vol. 5(4): 890-898.
2. S.O. Akhmetova, M.S. Suleimenova, M.B. Rebezov, Mechanism of an improvement of business processes management system for food production: case of meat products enterprise, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues (2019) Vol. 6(4): 1807-1822.
3. K.V. Balakin, Appeal against decisions of courts of civil jurisdiction in France: thesis of the candidate of legal sciences (2001).
4. A.S. Komarov, A.A. Kostin, O.N. Zimenkova, E.V. Vershinina, Civil and commercial law of foreign countries (2019).
5. A.D. Keilyn, International Trade Arbitration, (1950-1961).
6. E.I. Nosyreva, Alternative dispute resolution procedures as a means of ensuring accessibility of justice, in Actual problems of civil law, civil and arbitration proceeding, E.I. Nosyreva (Eds.) (2002), pp. 168-180.
7. V.K. Puchinsky, Civil process of foreign countries (2008).
8. Bourgeois justice. Status and development prospects, A.M. Yakovlev (Eds.) (1989).
9. A.V. Kuzovkov, Civil law (2017): 27.
10. K.V. Balakin, Appeal against decisions of courts of civil jurisdiction in France: thesis of the candidate of legal sciences (2001).
11. Bourgeois justice. Status and development prospects, A.M. Yakovlev (Eds.) (1989).
12. A.D. Keilyn, International Trade Arbitration, (1950-1961).
13. E.I. Nosyreva, Alternative dispute resolution procedures as a means of ensuring accessibility of justice, in Actual problems of civil law, civil and arbitration proceeding, E.I. Nosyreva (Eds.) (2002), pp. 168-180.
14. V.K. Puchinsky, Civil process of foreign countries (2008).
15. Bourgeois justice. Status and development prospects, A.M. Yakovlev (Eds.) (1989).
16. European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (04.11.1950). Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_29160/
17. See V.A. Belov, European Contract Code: general and comparative legal commentary (2017).
18. Convention оn the Recognition and Enforcement оf Foreign Arbitral Awards (10.06.1958). Available at: https://www.uncitral.org/pdf/russian/texts/arbitration/NY-conv/New-York-Convention-R.pdf
19. European Convention on International Commercial Arbitration (21.04.1961). Available at: https://legalacts.ru/doc/evropeiskaja-konventsija-o-vneshnetorgovom-arbitrazhe-zakliuchena-v/
20. The Inter-American Convention on International Commercial Arbitration (01.30.1971). Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1900688
21. Amman Convention on Commercial Arbitration of the Arab States (14.04.1987). Available at: http://www.conventions.ru/view_base.php?id=1066
22. 1United Nation Commission on International Trade Law Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, (21.06.1985). Available at: https://base.garant.ru/10135203/
23. V.V. Terekhov, European civil process: current status in the legal system of the European Union and member countries, Law enforcement (2017) No.2: 12.
24. I.V. Getman-Pavlova, Private international law: textbook (2005): 75.
25. S.A. Mikhailova, Legal regulation of judicial cooperation in civil, commercial and family matters within the framework of the European Union: thesis of the Candidate of legal sciences (2012).
26. V.V. Voynikov, Legal regulation of the procedure for the consideration of cross-border disputes in civil matters within the EU, Actual problems of Russian law (2019) Vol. 102(5): 3-8.
27. V.V. Terekhov, Pros and cons of the European civil process, Lex Russica (2018) Vol. 134(1): 11-23.
28. V.V. Voynikov, Space of freedom, security and justice in the EU legal system, Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law (2018) Vol.73(6)-2018: 13-25.
29. E. N. Trikoz, Creation of the criminal law system of the European Union, Journal of Russian Law (2007) Vol. 130(10): 34-45.
30. N.Yu. Erpyleva, D.M. Maksimov, The recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments: the national and regional dimension, Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics (2017) No. 2: 26-34.
31. G.A. Zhilin, Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights in the system of sources of civil and arbitration procedural law, Journal of Constitutional Justice (2009) No. 1: 23-29.
32. E.A. Sukhanov, On Arbitration of Disputes, EJ-Yurist (2006) No. 24: 7.
33. G.A. Zhilin, Civil Justice: Current Issues (2010): 76.
34. L.A. Prokudina, Legal proceedings in arbitration courts: trends towards professionalization, Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics (2008) No.2: 12-18.
35. T.I. Otcheskaya, Procedural aspects of the participation of the prosecutor in the arbitration process, Actual problems of Russian law (2018) Vol. 87(2): 23-38.
36. M.M. Gotra, Admissibility of the participation of third parties in the arbitration process on insolvency (bankruptcy) cases, Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences (2018) No. 2: 17-22.
37. S.Z. Zhenetl, Institute of third parties in the civil and arbitration process: problems and ways to improve, Problems of Economics and Legal Practice (2018) No. 2: 34-48.
38. D.A. Komarov, Arbitration manager as a person performing managerial functions in a commercial or other organization, Bulletin of Vyatka State University (2014) No. 10: 12-18.
39. O. Yu. Glukhova, A. Yu. Shevyakov, Consideration by arbitration courts of certain categories of cases, Socio-economic phenomena and processes (2017) No. 3: 18-28.
40. O.F. Zasemkova, Rules for the effective organization of the process in international arbitration: basic provisions, Bulletin of the Kutafin State Law University (2019) Vol. 62(10): 34-48.
41. The Information of Ministry of Justice of Russian Federation – “The end of the transition period of the Arbitrary Proceedings Reform in Russian Federation” (01.11.2017). Available at:
42. http://www.consultant.ru/law/hotdocs/51366.html/
43. V. Khvaley, Creation the Russian Arbitrary Association: why is it necessary? Law Journal “Legal Insight” (2013) No. 8: 18.
44. R.V. Malinskaya, D.K. Sakhno, Confidentiality of arbitration: is the truth hidden by a veil of secrecy?
International Commercial Arbitration Review (2014) Vol.8 (1): 17-34.
45. R.V. Malinskaya, D.K. Sakhno, Confidentiality of arbitration: is the truth hidden by a veil of secrecy?
International Commercial Arbitration Review (2014) Vol. 8(1): 17-34.
46. M. Gritsenko, I. Urzhumov, S. Usoskin. An arbitrary phoenix, Law Journal “Legal Insight” (2018) Vol. 68(2): 34.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
