Evaluating System Content's Quality in E-Learning System By Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/jv5qpn06Keywords:
E-learning System, Contents, Quality, AHP, Priority, Pairwise Comparison.Abstract
This study identifies and analysis critical quality characterizes that should be considered to ensure successful development and implementation for the E-learning system in institutes, its System Content's Quality characterize with its sub characteristics and attributes.
The model has been empirically validated by fitting the model to data collected from 302 students engaged with an e-learning system in one of the Jordan universities through the pairwise comparison technique from all evaluated end users.
System Content Quality characteristic has three sub characteristics i.e. Student Oriented Domain, Online services and Content's Quality. Each sub characteristic has its attributes to determine the results of the evaluation. Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) had extensively been applied in a multi-criteria decision for making many practical decision-making problems the AHP model had been used to collect the pairwise comparison judgment from all evaluated end users.
Downloads
References
1. Al_Nawaiseh, A. J., Helmy, Y., & Khalil, E. (2020). A New Software Quality Model for academic Information System ( case study E-learning system). INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC & TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH, 9(01), 271-282. Retrieved from www.ijstr.org
2. Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa'deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2019). Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study. ScienceDirect(Computers in Human Behavior). Retrieved from www.elsevier.com/locate/comphumbeh
3. AHussain, J., Hassan, A., Bilal, H., Ali, R., Afzal, M., Hussain, S., & Lee, S. (2018). Model-based adaptive user interface based on context and user experience evaluation. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, 12(1), 1-16.
4. Pour, M. J., Hosseinzadeh, M., & Bagh, M. (2017). Developing a new framework for evaluating e-learning systems: integrating BSC and FAHP. Kybernetes, Volume 46(issue 8), pp1303-1324. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/K-02-2017-0060
5. Uppal, M. A., Ali, S., & Gulliver, S. (2017). Factors determining e-learning service quality-ELQ factors. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(3), 412-426.
6. Aguarón, J., Teresa Escobar, M., Moreno-Jiménez, J., & Turón, A. (2019). AHP-Group Decision Making Based on Consistency. Mathematics, 7(3), 242.
7. Al- Adwan, A., & Smedley, J. (2012). implementing e-learning in the Jordanian higher education system: factors affecting impact. International Journal International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 8(1) 121-135.
8. Al Adwan, A. S. (2018). Development of E_learning in the Higher Education Systems. German: Deutsh Nationalbibliothek.
9. Al_nawaiseh, A., & Al_nawaiseh, S. (2015). The attitude of Information Technology Students at Mutah University Towards Computerized Exam. European Scientific Journal, 11(1857-7881).
10. Al-Adwan, A. S. ( 2017). Development of E_learning in the Higher Education Systems. German: Deutsh Nationalbibliothek.
11. Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa'deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67–86.
12. Almarabeh, T. (2014). Students’ perceptions of e-learning at the University of Jordan.
International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Emerging Technologies in Elearning.
13. Almarabeh, T., Majdalawi, Y., & Yousef, R. (2015). The University of Jordan e-learning platform: state, students'acceptance and challenges. (Vols. 7, 999- 1007). Journal of Software Engineering and Applications.
14. Alrawashdeh, T. A., Muhairat, M., & Ahmad, A. (2013). Evaluating the Quality of Software in ERP Systems Using the ISO 9126 Model. International Journal of Ambient Systems and Applications (IJASA), 1-9.
15. Amal, A., Weam, A., & Azrilah, A. (2017). Total Quality Management for Software Development.
International Journal of Computer Applications.
16. Ansar, D., Khalifa, M., & Mohammed, Q. (2018). Information System Evaluation based on Multi-Criteria decision Making: comparison of two sectors. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications(IJACSA), Vol. 9.
17. Baklizi, M., & Alghyaline, S. (2011). Evaluation of E-Learning websites in Jordan universities based on ISO/IEC 9126 standard. IEEE 3rd International Conference (pp. 71-73). IEEE, In Communication Software and Networks (ICCSN).
18. Cidral, W., Oliveira, T., Di Felice, M., & Aparicio, M. (2018). E-learning success determinants: Brazilian empirical study. computers & education,122, 273-290.
19. Deng, X., & Deng, Y. (2019). D-AHP method with different credibility of the information. Soft Computing, 23(2), 683-691.
20. Etaati, L., Sadi-Nezhad, S., & Makue, A. (2011). Using fuzzy group analytical network process and ISO 9126 quality model in software selection: A case study in e-learning systems. Journal of Applied Sciences. Journal of Applied Sciences, 11 (1), 96-103. DOI:10.3923/jas.2011.96.103
21. Goepel, K. (2018). Implementation of an Online Software Tool for the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP-OS). International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, volume 10(Issue 3), pp 469-487.
22. Gürkut, C., & Nat, M. (2018). Important Factors Affecting Student Information System Quality and Satisfaction. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, ISSN:1305-8223.
23. ISO/IEC 9126-1. (2001). Retrieved from Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Part 1,2,3: Quality Model: http://www.iso.ch
24. ISO/IEC TR, 9126-3. (2003). Software Engineering – Product Quality – Part3: International Organization for Standardization. Retrieved 2003, from https://www.iso.org/standard/22891.html
25. Systems in Higher Education. WSEAS Transactions on Computers, 7(5), 473-482.
26. M. M., & Franco, F. a. (2017). Applying a system dynamics approach in software and information system projects. ScienceDirect Information and Software Technology Journal, 58-73. Retrieved Augst 26, 2017
27. Madjid, K., Olfa, L., Amar, & Ramdane-Cherif. (2016). Ontology Software Quality Model for Fuzzy Logic Evaluation. The 7th International Conference on Ambient Systems, Networks and Technologies.
28. Oun Alla, M. M. (2013). The Impact of System Quality in E-learning System. Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 1, 14-22. Retrieved from www.aripd.org/jcsit
29. Paredes, J. L. (2016). Evaluation of Software Quality Characteristics of Academic Information System Mobile Application. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications.
30. Tabrizi, S. S., Tufekci, C., Gumus, O., & Cavus, A. (2017). Usability Evaluation for Near East University Student Information System. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences [Online]., pp 235-243.
31. Techopedia Inc. (2019). planned-downtime. Retrieved from https://www.techopedia.com/definition/28059/planned-downtime
32. Upgrade. (2019, January 29). In Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upgrade
33. Yuhana, u., Rahardjo, A., & Rochimah, S. (2014). Academic Information System Quality Measurement using Quality Instrument. A Proposed Model, Proceeding of International Conference on Data and Software Engineering (pp. 231-236). Indonesia: ICoDSE.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
