Development of IMA-3D Based E-Learning on Vocational Education in the 4D (Define-Design-Development, and Disseminate) Instructional Design Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/w97t8y68Keywords:
Interactive Multimedia, AutoCAD 3D, E-Learning, Vocational EducationAbstract
The ICT has become an important part of learning success in many countries. The addition of technology to learning online or mixed is more in demand by students in learning in vocational education. Previous researchers have developed the concept of interactive learning assisted by multimedia. However media research is limited in computer space and time of use. This study aims to develop interactive multimedia-AutoCAD 3D (IMA-3D) by measuring expert validation and user perception. The research method uses the 4D model approach (Define-Design-Development, and Disseminate). Expert validation consisted of media and language experts as well as material experts as considerations in the development in accordance with the context of vocational education media. As many as 34 respondents were involved in the use of IMA-3D with the characteristics of ± 18-20 years of age from various vocational schools with the organizers of the engineering curriculum. Data collection was carried out using a questionnaire with a measurement scale (RS. 1-5). Media and language validation results obtained an average of 79.20% (score. 99.00 from 125.00) in the agree category and validation of material experts obtained an average of 84.44% (score. 38.00 from 45.00) with a very agree category and both recommendations are valid. The user perception test results obtained an average of 72.16% (Score. 736 out of 1,020) with the category "Feasible or good". Interactive multimedia can increase new understanding and ease of learning, interests, talents, and motivation, learning more fun, and knowledge competency and practice are more directed at positive increases above 60%.
Downloads
References
1. A. Mynbayeva, Z. Sadvakassova, and B. Akshalova, ‘Pedagogy of the Twenty-First Century: Innovative Teaching Methods’, New Pedagog. Chall. 21st Century - Contrib. Res. Educ., Dec. 2017, doi: 10.5772/intechopen.72341.
2. P. Muriithi, D. Horner, and L. Pemberton, ‘Factors contributing to adoption and use of information and communication technologies within research collaborations in Kenya’, Inf. Technol. Dev., vol. 22, no. sup1,
pp. 84–100, Aug. 2016, doi: 10.1080/02681102.2015.1121856.
3. F. C. Paletta and N. Dias Vieira Junior, ‘Information technology and communication and best practices in it lifecycle management’, J. Technol. Manag. Amp Innov., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 80–94, 2008, doi: 10.4067/S0718-27242008000200007.
4. A. Saiti and G. Prokopiadou, ‘Impact of Information and Communication Technologies on School Administration: Research on the Greek Schools of Secondary Education’, in Electronic Government, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009, pp. 305–316, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-03516-6_26.
5. M. L. Bernacki, J. A. Greene, and H. Crompton, ‘Mobile technology, learning, and achievement: Advances in understanding and measuring the role of mobile technology in education’, Contemp. Educ. Psychol., vol. 60, p. 101827, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101827.
6. P. Pardi̇mi̇n, N. Arcana, and D. Supri̇adi̇, ‘Developing Media Based on the Information and Communications Technology to Improve The Effectiveness of The Direct Instruction Method in Mathematics Learning’, J. Educ. Gift. Young Sci., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1311–1323, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.17478/jegys.592636.
7. B. Trilling and C. Fadel, ‘21st century skills: Learning for life in our times’, 2009. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2009-18745-000 (accessed Mar. 28, 2020).
8. M. Nurtanto, H. Sofyan, M. Fawaid, and R. Rabiman, ‘Problem-based learning (PBL) in industry 4.0: Improving learning quality through character-based literacy learning and life career skill (LL-LCS)’, Univers.
J. Educ. Res., vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 2487–2494, 2019, doi: 10.13189/ujer.2019.071128.
9. R. A. Z. El Islami, I. J. Sari, S. Sjaifuddin, M. Nurtanto, M. Ramli, and A. Siregar, ‘An Assessment of Pre-service Biology Teachers on Student Worksheets Based on Scientific Literacy’, presented at the Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2019, vol. 1155, no. 1, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012068.
10. Z. Arifin, M. Nurtanto, W. Warju, R. Rabiman, and N. Kholifah, ‘The TAWOCK Conceptual Model for Content Knowledge for Professional Teaching in Vocational Education’, Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ. IJERE, vol. 9, no. 3, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v9i3.20561.
11. S. Billett, ‘Vocational Education - Purposes, Traditions and Prospects’, 2011. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9789400719538 (accessed Feb. 02, 2020).
12. M. Nurtanto, D. Widjanarko, H. Sofyan, Rabiman, and M. B. Triyono, ‘Learning By Creating: Transforming Automotive Electrical Textual Material Into Visual Animation As A Creative Learning Products (CLP)’, Int.
J. Sci. Technol. Res., vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 1634–1642, Oct. 2019, Accessed: Jan. 18, 2020. [Online]. Available: http://www.ijstr.org/paper-references.php?ref=IJSTR-1019-22932.
13. M. Nurtanto, H. Sofyan, P. Pardjono, and S. Suyitno, ‘Development model for competency improvement and national vocational qualification support frames in automotive technology’, Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 168–176, 2020, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v9i1.20447.
14. M. Nurtanto, S. Nurhaji, D. Widjanarko, M. B. R. Wijaya, and H. Sofyan, ‘Comparison of Scientific Literacy in Engine Tune-up Competencies through Guided Problem-Based Learning and Non-Integrated Problem-Based Learning in Vocational Education’, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1114, p. 012038, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1114/1/012038.
15. V. Gracia-Ibáñez and M. Vergara, ‘Applying action research in CAD teaching to improve the learning experience and academic level’, Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 13, no. 1, p. 9, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.1186/s41239-016-0010-5.
16. Y. (Linda) R. Chassiakos, J. Radesky, D. Christakis, M. A. Moreno, C. Cross, and C. on C. A. Media, ‘Children and Adolescents and Digital Media’, Pediatrics, vol. 138, no. 5, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2593.
17. M. Salehudi̇n, ‘The Influence of Creative Learning Assisted by Instagram to Improve Middle School Students’ Learning Outcomes of Graphic Design Subject’, J. Educ. Gift. Young Sci., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 849–865, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.17478/jegys.626513.
18. A. Cann, ‘Online technology for teaching and learning—gains and losses’, FEMS Microbiol. Lett., vol. 362, no. 14, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnv099.
19. P. M. Sejati, C. A. Budiningsih, and Pujianto, ‘Multimedia in Disaster Risk Reduction’, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1233, p. 012090, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012090.
20. S. Geng, K. M. Y. Law, and B. Niu, ‘Investigating self-directed learning and technology readiness in blending learning environment’, Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 16, no. 1, p. 17, May 2019, doi: 10.1186/s41239-019-0147-0.
21. Y.-T. Sung, K.-E. Chang, and T.-C. Liu, ‘The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis’, Comput. Educ., vol. 94, pp. 252–275, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.008.
22. J. Groff, ‘Technology-Rich Innovative Learning Environments’, p. 30, 2013.
23. F. Bambaeeroo and N. Shokrpour, ‘The impact of the teachers’ non-verbal communication on success in teaching’, J. Adv. Med. Educ. Prof., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 51–59, Apr. 2017, Accessed: Apr. 25, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5346168/.
24. E. Marpanaji, M. I. Mahali, and R. A. S. Putra, ‘Survey on How to Select and Develop Learning Media Conducted by Teacher Professional Education Participants’, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1140, p. 012014, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1140/1/012014.
25. D. R. Prozesky, ‘Communication and Effective Teaching’, Community Eye Health, vol. 13, no. 35, pp. 44–45, 2000, Accessed: Apr. 25, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1705977/.
26. M. K. Khalil and I. A. Elkhider, ‘Applying learning theories and instructional design models for effective instruction’, Adv. Physiol. Educ., vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 147–156, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.1152/advan.00138.2015.
27. H. Tambunan and E. Napitupulu, ‘Effectiveness of Interactive Multimedia Based Learning Model in Engineering Mechanics’, Int. Educ. Stud., vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 155–162, 2016, Accessed: Apr. 25, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1116024.
28. T. Chao, J. Chen, J. R. Star, and C. Dede, ‘Using Digital Resources for Motivation and Engagement in Learning Mathematics: Reflections from Teachers and Students’, Digit. Exp. Math. Educ., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 253–277, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s40751-016-0024-6.
29. B. Lestari̇ and A. Mustadi̇, ‘Animated Video Media vs Comic on Storytelling Skills: Which One is More Effective?’, J. Educ. Gift. Young Sci., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 167–182, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.17478/jegys.664119.
30. S. Park, ‘The Effects of Social Cue Principles on Cognitive Load, Situational Interest, Motivation, and Achievement in Pedagogical Agent Multimedia Learning’, Educ. Technol. Soc., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 211–229, 2015.
31. J. D. Frechette and F. J, Developing Media Literacy in Cyberspace: Pedagogy and Critical Learning for the Twenty-first-century Classroom. Greenwood Publishing Group, 2002.
32. S. Aloraini, ‘The impact of using multimedia on students’ academic achievement in the College of Education at King Saud University’, J. King Saud Univ. - Lang. Transl., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 75–82, Jul. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.jksult.2012.05.002.
33. A. E. Putri and Mukminan, ‘Use Of Interactive Learning Media Based On Macromedia Flash On Student Learning Outcomes’, presented at the International Conference on Social Science and Character Educations (ICoSSCE 2018) and International Conference on Social Studies, Moral, and Character Education (ICSMC 2018), Jun. 2019, Accessed: Apr. 25, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/icossce-icsmc-18/125909989.
34. B. J. Ramshaw et al., ‘The role of multimedia interactive programs in training for laparoscopic procedures’, Surg. Endosc., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 21–27, Jan. 2001, doi: 10.1007/s004640000319.
35. R. R. García, J. S. Quirós, R. G. Santos, S. M. González, and S. M. Fernanz, ‘Interactive multimedia animation with Macromedia Flash in Descriptive Geometry teaching’, Comput. Educ., vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 615–639, Nov. 2007, Accessed: Apr. 25, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/66505/.
36. F. Hamidi, Z. M. Kharamideh, and F. Ghorbandordinejad, ‘Comparison of the training effects of interactive multimedia (CDs) and non-interactive media (films) on increasing learning speed, accuracy and memorization in biological science course’, Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 3, pp. 144–148, Jan. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.025.
37. R. Shih, Principles and Practice: An Integrated Approach to Engineering Graphics and AutoCAD 2015. SDC Publications, 2014.
38. R. Mayer and R. E. Mayer, The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press, 2005.
39. S. Thiagarajan, Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Exceptional Children: A Sourcebook [By] Sivasailam Thiagarajan, Dorothy S. Semmel [and] Melvyn I. Semmel. Council for Exceptional Children, 1974.
40. A. Gorbi Irawan, N. nyoman Padmadewi, and L. Putu Artini, ‘Instructional materials development through 4D model’, SHS Web Conf., vol. 42, p. 00086, 2018, doi: 10.1051/shsconf/20184200086.
41. M. Heras and I. Ruiz-Mallén, ‘Responsible research and innovation indicators for science education assessment: how to measure the impact?’, Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 39, no. 18, pp. 2482–2507, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1080/09500693.2017.1392643.
42. S. J. A. N. B. S. Mohamad, D. Asirvatham, and H. H. M. Khalid, ‘Quality Framework for Assessment of Multimedia Learning Materials Version 1.0’, Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 67, pp. 571–579, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.362.
43. J. Li, P. D. Antonenko, and J. Wang, ‘Trends and issues in multimedia learning research in 1996–2016: A bibliometric analysis’, Educ. Res. Rev., vol. 28, p. 100282, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100282.
44. A. Popovici and C. Mironov, ‘Students’ Perception on Using eLearning Technologies’, Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 180, pp. 1514–1519, May 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.300.
45. L. A. Schindler, G. J. Burkholder, O. A. Morad, and C. Marsh, ‘Computer-based technology and student engagement: a critical review of the literature’, Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 25, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1186/s41239-017-0063-0.
46. R. Rabiman, M. Nurtanto, and N. Kholifah, ‘Design And Development E-Learning System By Learning Management System (LMS) In Vocational Education’, vol. 9, no. 01, p. 6, 2020.
47. R. Rabiman, W. Widarto, M. Nurtanto, and N. Kholifah, ‘Stem education: Vocational teacher’s perspective of 21st century’, Int. J. Psychosoc. Rehabil., vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 9887–9893, 2020, doi: 10.37200/IJPR/V24I6/PR260985.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
