EVALUATION OF THE MEDICAL CARE ARRANGEMENT FOR NEWBORNS IN CONDITIONS OF A PATIENT-ORIENTED APPROACH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/d4zggt94Keywords:
Perinatal center, newborns, medical care arrangement for newborns, satisfaction of mothers, the main reasons for dissatisfactionAbstract
--Today, in the search for new approaches to improving the quality of medical services, the patients’opinion can serve as one of the criteria for a comprehensive evaluation of the activities of a medical organization. In order to evaluate the satisfaction of mothers with providing medical care to newborns by random sampling, an anonymous survey was conducted of 1026 mothers whose children were born in the perinatal center in 2018-2019. It was found that 71.9% of mothers were hospitalized to the perinatal center as planned, on the doctor’s referral due to the state of their health or the health of the child.79.4% of respondents were served under compulsory medical insurance. On average, mothers rated the work of doctors who provide medical care to newborns by 4.6±0.11 points, and average medical personnel - by 4.4±0.09 points. However, 13.7% of mothers indicated that doctors were not always tactful and polite and 41.2% of women – medical nurses. 15.9% of mothers were partially dissatisfied with the conditions of the child’s stay in the perinatal center.In most cases, the reasons for dissatisfaction were unregulated temperature conditions in the room (47.4%), inattentiveness of medical staff (9.1%) and lighting (14.8%). In general, the medical care arrangement for newborns in the perinatal center received a fairly high rating from mothers (an average of 4.4±0.09 points) and 93.8% of respondents would recommend this maternity facility for providing medical care to children.
Downloads
References
1. National Center for Health Statistics. Guide to completing the facility worksheet for the certificate of live birth and report of fetal death. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, National Center for Health Statistics; 2016.
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/GuidetoCompleteFacilityWks.pdfpdf icon7.
2. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Driscoll AK, Drake P. Births: final data for 2017. National vital statistics reports: from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System. 2018; 67: 1–50
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr67/nvsr67_08-508.pdfpdf icon.PubMedexternal icon.
3. Moiseeva K. E., Yuryev V. K., Alekseeva A. V., Glushchenko V. A., Kharbediya Sh. D. Some assessment results of medical care for newborns. Archivos Venezolanos de Farmacologia y Terapeutica. 2019; 39(3): 192-195.
4. Halliday H.L. Speer C.P. Editorial: Research Methods in Neonatal Medicine. Neonatology 2018;114 (1): 43-51.
5. Soll R.F. · McGuire W. Evidence-Based Practice: Improving the Quality of Perinatal Care. Neonatology 2019; 116: 193–198.
6. McGuire W. Halliday H.L. The Research Cycle: Improving Care and Outcomes for Newborn Infants. Neonatology 2018; 114: 2–6.
7. Alexandrovich Yu.S., Parshin E.V., Pshenisnov K.V. Prediction of early outcomes of critical conditions in newborns.Bulletin of anesthesiology and resuscitation. 2012; 9(4): 36-42.
8. 8.Sofronova L.N., Fedorova L.A., Kyanksep A.N. et al. Late prematurity a high-risk group for early and long-term complications.Pediatrics. G.N. SperanskyJournal. 2018; 97(1): 131-140.
9. Ivanov D.O. Guide to Perinatology. Saint-Petersburg: InformNavigator. 2015; 1216 p.
10. Prometnoy D.V., AleksandrovichYu.S., PshenisnovK.V. Fluid overload as a predictor of death in children in critical condition.Generalresuscitationscience.2019; 15(1): 12-26.
11. Ivanov D.O., Yurev V.K., Shevtsova O.G., Moiseeva K.E., Berezkina E.N. Fetoinfatilelooses in the north-west region of Russia. Electronic Journal of General Medicine.2018; 1: 1-6.
12. Egan M., Petticrew M. Public Health. Risk factors in home and community settings and their associations with.2014; 8: 227-229.
13. Main indicators of maternal and child health, activities of the child protection and maternity services in the Russian Federation in 2016. Moscow: FRIHOI of MoH of the RF; 2017. 168 p.
14. Main indicators of maternal and child health, activities of the child protection and maternity services in the Russian Federation in 2018. Moscow: FRIHOI of MoH of the RF; 2019: 170 p.
15. SaverBG, MartinSA, AdlerRN, CandibLM, DeligiannidisKE, GoldingJ, etal. Care that matters: quality measurement and health care. PLoS Med; 12(11): e1001902.
16. Rosenbusch J, Ismail I., Ringle C. The agony of choice for medical tourists: a patient satisfaction index model. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology; 2018;9(3):267-279.
17. Batbaatar E, Dorjdagva J, Luvsannyam A, Savino MM, Amenta P. Determinants of patient satisfaction: a systematic review. PerspectivesinPublicHealth;2016;137(2):89-101.
18. Evstigneev S.V., Vasilyev V.V. Evaluation of the quality of medical care in a hospital based on the criteria of patient and doctor satisfaction. Scientific Bulletin of the Belgorod State University. Series: Medicine. Pharmacy 2016;(19):72-79.
19. Butova T G., YakovlevaE.Yu., Danilina E.P., Beloborodov A.A. Service and quality of medical services. Service in Russia and abroad.2014;(8):3-12.
20. Brazovskaya N.G., Deev I.A., Kobyakova O.S., Bogaychuk P.M., Yarovoy N.D., Schneider G.V.,
Boykov V.A., Baranovskaya S.V. Patient-oriented approach: analysis of the relationship between patients’evaluation of the effectiveness of medical care and the conditions for its provision. Social aspects of public health. 2019; 65(5):1. URL: http://vestnik.mednet.ru/content/view/1097/30/lang,ru/
21. Sadovoy M.A., KobyakovaO.S., DeevI.A., KulikovE.S., TabakaevN.A. TyufilinD.S., etal. Satisfaction with the quality of medical care: “you cannot please everyone” or “the patient is always right”? Bulletin of Siberian medicine.2017;(16): С. 152–161.
22. Siburina T.A., Volnukhin A.V., Vechorko V.I., Reze A.G. Managing the relationship between doctors and patients in a medical organization. Social aspects of public health.2018; 64(6). URL: http://vestnik.mednet.ru/content/view/1025/30/lang,ru/.
23. Naronova N.A., Surnina E.A., Cheraneva Yu.A. Estimation of the values of the immunity and viscosity of dairy mixtures in different types of water. International Journal of Medicine and Psychology. 2019. Vol. 2. Issue 4. P. 43–46.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
