PARENT'S PERSPECTIVE ON EDUCATIONAL GAMES: PHENOMENOGRAPHY STUDY IN INDONESIA

Authors

  • Surya Amami Pramuditya Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Universitas Swadaya Gunung Djati, Indonesia Author
  • Wahyudin Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia Author
  • Elah Nurlaelah Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/k2t33806

Keywords:

Math Education Games, Parents, Instructional media

Abstract

The development of games in Indonesia is quite popular, making games a part of modern people's lives for children and adults. Pros and cons also occur regarding the impact of playing games (commercial games). Games that contain elements of violence can have a negative impact on users. However, there is also a positive impact of playing games, which can improve the cognitive and spatial abilities of a child. Mathematical educational game (in the application), is a game in which there are educational and learning elements, inserted mathematics learning content in the form of questions and material. This study aims to describe parents' perspective on educational games that contain mathematics learning content as instructional media. This research will focus on parents of educators and not educators. The research design uses phenomenography, where researchers want to see parents' perspective on the phenomenon of educational games as instructional media. From the results of this study, obtained a positive perspective of the educational game with some suggest. Keeping in mind the age, playing time and supervision of children, most parents agree that educational games can be an instructional media for their children.

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Anderson, C. A., Gentile, D. A., & Dill, K. E. (2012). Prosocial, antisocial, and other effects of recreational video games. In D. G. Singer & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of children and the media (2nd ed.) (pp. 249-272). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

2. Asgari, M and Kaufman D. (2004).Intrinsic Motivation and Game Design. Paper presented at the 35th Annual Conference of the International Simulation and Gaming Association (ISAGA) and Conjoint Conference of SAGSAGA, 6 -10 September 2004, Munich, Germany.

3. Baek, YK. (2008). Revealing new hidden curriculum and pedagogy of digital games, In R. E. Ferdig (Ed.). Handbook of Research on Effective Electronic Gaming in Education, Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

4. Bailey, K., West, R.,& Anderson, C.A.(2010). A negative association between video game experience and proactive cognitive control. Psychophysiology, 47, 34-42.

5. Birnbaum, M. H. (Ed.). (2000). Psychological experiments on the Internet. Elsevier.

6. Bowden, J. A., & Walsh, E. (2000). Phenomenography. RMIT University Press: Australia.

7. Bowden, J. A., & Green, P. (2005). Doing Developmental

8. Phenomenography. RMIT University Press: Australia.

9. Chen, J. (2007) . Flow in Games (and Everything Else). A well- designed game transports its players to their personal Flow Zones, delivering genuine feelings of pleasure and happiness. Communications of the acm, 50 (4), 31-34.

10. Dabbagh, N., Benson, A. D., Denham, A. (2015). Learning Technologies and Globalization.

Pedagogical Frameworks and Applications. Springer.

11. De Lisi, R., & Wolford, J. L. (2002). Improving children's mental rotation accuracy with computer game playing. The Journal of genetic psychology, 163(3), 272-282.

12. Feldon, D. F., & Tofel-Grehl, C. (2018). Phenomenography as a Foundation for Mixed Models Research. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(7), 887-899.

13. Ferguson, C. J. (2007). The good, the bad and the ugly: A meta- analytic review of positive and negative effects of violent video games. Psychiatric quarterly, 78(4), 309-316.

14. Feriatna, T., Pramuditya, S. A., & Aminah, N. (2017). Pengembangan Aplikasi Android Sebagai Media Pembelajaran Matematika Pada Materi Peluang Untuk Siswa SMA Kelas X. LEMMA, 4(1).

15. Gentile, D. A., Choo, H., Liau, A. K., Sim, T., Li, D., Ring, D., & Khoo, A. (2011). Pathological video game use among youths: A two-year longitudinal study. Pediatrics, 127, e319-e329.

16. Gilster, P., & Glister, P. (1997). Digital literacy. New York: Wiley Computer Pub.

17. Greenberg, B. S., Sherry, J., Lachlan, K., Lucas, K., & Holmstrom, A. (2008). Orientations to video games among gender and age groups.

18. Simulation & Gaming. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1046878108319930.

19. Henry, S. (2013). Cerdas Dengan Games. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Kim, BK., Park HS., and Baek YK. (2009). Not just fun, but serious strategies: Using meta-cognitive strategies in gamebased learning. Computers & Education, 52 (4), 800-810.

20. Lynch, D., & Keenan, M. (2016). The good behaviour game: Maintenance effects. International Journal of Educational Research 87, 91-99.

21. Park, H. (2012). Relationship between Motivation and Student’s Activity on Educational Game.

International Journal of Grid and Distributed Computing, 5 (1), 101-114.

22. Pramuditya, S. A., Noto, M. S., & Syaefullah, D. (2017). Game Edukasi Rpg Matematika. Eduma: Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 77-84.

23. Pramuditya, S. A., Noto, M. S., & Azhar, R. N. (2018). Mathematics Media Instruction-Based Android For X-Grade Senior High School. Journal of Educational Experts (JEE), 1(1), 1-10.

24. Pramuditya, S. A., Noto, M. S., & Syaefullah, D. (2018, May). The educational game design on relation and function materials. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1013, No. 1, p. 012138). IOP Publishing.

25. Pramuditya, S. A., Noto, M. S., & Purwono, H. (2018). Desain Game Edukasi Berbasis Android pada Materi Logika Matematika. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 2(2), 165-179.

Downloads

Published

31.10.2020

How to Cite

Pramuditya, S. A., Wahyudin, & Nurlaelah, E. (2020). PARENT’S PERSPECTIVE ON EDUCATIONAL GAMES: PHENOMENOGRAPHY STUDY IN INDONESIA. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(8), 7663-7674. https://doi.org/10.61841/k2t33806