THE EFFECT OF SELF - LEADERSHIP, ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE, AND WORK MOTIVATION ON JOB SATISFACTION AT REGIONAL GENERAL HOSPITAL KARAWANG
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/ma2azj55Keywords:
self-leadership,, work motivation, organizational cultureAbstract
The aim of this research is to obtain information and to suggest improvement related to the effect of self-leadership,organizational culture, and work motivation on job satisfaction at the Karawang Regional General Hospital. Survey was conducted in this research with 108 samples selected randomly. Data have been analyzed by path analysis. The findings of this research show that (1) self-leadership effects directly on work motivation (2) organizational culture effects directly on work motivation and (3) work motivation effects directly on job satisfaction (4) self-leadership effects directly on work motivation; and (5) organizational culture effects directly on job motivation. Based on those findings it can be concluded that any concern toward self-leadership, organizational culture, work motivation should be put into strategic planning of human resources development in increasing job satisfaction at The Karawang Regional Gereral Hospital.
Downloads
References
1. Alves, J.C. , Lovelace, K. , Manz, C.C. , Matsypura, D. , Toyasaki, F. , & Ke, K. 2006. A cross cultural perspective of self-leadership. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21: 338-359.
2. Abawi, K. (2013) ‘Data Collection Instruments (Questionnaire & Interview)’, Training in Sexual and Reproductive Health Research Geneva, 1(Geneva Workshop 2013), p. 18.
3. Abele, A. E. and Spurk, D. (2009) ‘How do objective and subjective career success interrelate over time ?’, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82, pp. 803–824. doi: 10.1348/096317909X470924.
4. Alzyoud, A. A. Y. (2017) ‘The Predictors of Career Success’, International Review of Management and Marketing, 7(2), pp. 22–26. Available at: http: www.econjournals.com.
5. Ariani, D. W. (2013) ‘Personality and Learning Motivation’, European Journal of Business and Management, 5(10), pp. 2222–2839.
6. Ballout, H. I. (2007) ‘Career success support’, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(8), pp.741–765.doi:10.1108/02683940710837705.
7. Bencsik, A., Machova, R. and Hevesi, E. (2012) ‘The relationship between motivation and personality type.pdf’, International Journal of Academic Research, pp. 83–88.
8. Browning, Michelle. (2018). Self-Leadership: Why It Matters. International Journal of Business and Social Science Volume 9, Number 2, p.p. 14-18.
9. Cents, M. H. G. (2013) Effect of Values and Personality on the Motivation and Intention of User-Generated Content Across Cultures. Universiteit Twente
10. Colquitt, Jason A., Jeffery A. LePine, and Michael J. Wesson. Organizational Behavior:Improving Performance and Commitment in the Workplace. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin. 2009
11. Chen, X. (2016) ‘The Influences of Personality and Motivation on the Sharing of Misinformation on Social Media’, in iConference, pp. 1–11. doi: 10.9776/16145.
12. Druskat, V.A. , & Wheeler, J.V. 2003. Managing from the boundary: The effective leadership ofself-managing work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 435-457.Davis, Keith. Human Behavior at Work: Organizational Behavior. United States: Grolier Incorporated, 1991.
13. DeVito, J. A. The Interpersonal Commuication Book, 10th ed. Boston: Pearson-Allyn & Bacon.2004.
14. Foti, R.J. , & Hauenstein, N.M.A. 2007. Pattern and variable approaches in leadership emergence and effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 347-355
15. Faqeer-ul-ummi, U. Y., Javed, R. and Amjad, M. (2014) ‘Impact of personality on career success’, International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 9(3), pp. 1064–1072. Available at: http://www.ijias.issr-journals.org/.
16. Gagné, M. , & Deci, E. 2005. Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26: 331-362.
17. Gerhart, B. , & Rynes, S.L. 2003. Compensation: Theory, evidence, and strategic implications .
18. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Griffin, E.A First Look at Communication Theory, 6th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill. 2006.7
20. Gioia, Carol. Factors That Affect Job Satisfaction. http://www.helium.com/items (Diakses 6 September 2010).
21. Houghton, J. D., & Neck, C. P. (2002). The revised self-leadership questionnaire: Testing a hierarchical factor structure for self-leadership. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17(8), 672-691.
22. Hooker, C. , & Csikszentmihalyi. M. 2003. Flow, creativity, and shared leadership: Rethinking the motivation and structuring of knowledge work. In C. L. Pearce & J. A. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership: 217-234. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Houghton, J.D. , & Neck, C.P. 2002. The revised self-leadership questionnaire: Testing ahierarchical factor structure for self-leadership. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17: 672-691.
24. Houghton, J. , Neck, C. , & Manz, C. 2003. Self-leadership and superleadership. In C. Pearce & J.
25. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership: 123-140. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Ivancevich, J. and Matteson, M. (2002) Organisational Behaviour New York, USA: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
27. Judge, T. A. and Ilies, R. (2002) ‘Relationship of personality to performance motivation: A meta-analytic review’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), pp. 797–807. .
28. Kyguoliene, A. & Ganusauskaite, A. (2017). Dimensions Of Youth Self-Leadership: Measuring Skills, Behaviours And Cognitions. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference “Economic Science for rural development” No 46 Jelgava, LLU ESAF, 27-28 April 2017, pp. 84-91.
29. Lawrence, C. (2010) ‘Causal Theory and Research Design Chapter 6 of The Craft of Political Research’,
pp. 1–56.
30. Luthans, F. (2006) Perilaku Organisasi. Edisi 10. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Penerbit Andi.
31. Mathis, R. L. and Jackson, J. H. (2005) Human Resource Management: Essential Perspective.
32. Mason, Ohio: ThomsonSouth-Western.
33. Mathieu, J.E. , Gilson, L.L. , & Ruddy, T.M. 2006. Empowerment and team effectiveness: Anempirical test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 97-108.
34. McShane, Steven L. And Mary Ann Von Glinow. Organizational Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. 2008.
35. Mullins. Laurie J. Management and Organizational Behavior. Edinburgh, Harlow, Essex: Prentice Hall. 2005.
36. Mayer, Florian, Effective Work motivation in the Workplace. http://www.essortment.com/effective-interpersonal-communication-workplace- (Diakses 16 September 2011).
37. Newstrom, John W. Organizational Behavior at Work, Twelfth Edition. New York: McGrawHill Companies, Inc.,2007.
38. Newsrom, John w. And Keith Davis, Organizational Behavior: Human Behavior at Work. NewYork: McGraw-Hill Higher Education. 2002.
39. Neck, C. , & Houghton, J. 2006. Two decades of self-leadership theory and research: Past developments, present trends, and future possibilities. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21: 270-295
40. Neck, C.P. , & Manz, C.C. 2010. Mastering self-leadership: Empowering yourself for personalexcellence (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
41. Neubert, M.J. , & Wu, J.C.C. 2006. An investigation of the generalizability of the Houghton and Neck Revised Self-Leadership Questionnaire to a Chinese context. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21: 360-373.
42. Oberhuber, S. and Maurer,(2015) ‘Quantitative Data Analysis’. Tex durch Klicken hinzufügen, pp. 1–26.
43. Orebiyi, A.O. and T.P. Orebiyi. “The Influence of Work motivation On SecondaryShool Teacher’s Job Satisfaction and Commitment In Kogi State, Nigeria”. Journal of Communication and Culture: International Perspective; Vol.2. No.1, April 2011.
44. Pearce, C.L. , & Sims, H.P., Jr. 2002. Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice , 6: 172-197.
45. Raabe, B. , Frese, M. , & Beehr, T.A. 2007. Action regulation theory and career self-management.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70: 297-311.
46. Robbins, S. P. (2006) Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarat, Indonesia:
47. IndeksKelomp Gramedia
48. Seibert, S.E. , Silver, S.R. , & Randolph, W.A. 2004. Taking empowerment to the next level: A multiple-level model of empowerment, performance, and satisfaction . Academy of Management Journal, 47: 332-349.
49. Schneider, D. K. (2005) ‘Quantitative Data Analysis’,fo Educational Technologists, 1(5), pp. 1– 24.
50. Tata, J. , & Prasad, S. 2004. Team self-management, organizational structure, and judgments of team effectiveness. Journal of Managerial Issues, 16: 248-265.
51. Parks, L. and Guay, R. P. (2009) ‘Personality, values, and motivation’, Personality and Individual Differences, 47(7), pp. 675–684.
52. Paterson, A. et al. (2016) Quantitative Data Gathering Methods and Techniques. The Global, Research Methods for Accounting and Finance. The Global. Oxford England: Goodfellow Publishers Ltd. doi: 10.23912/978-1-910158-88-3-3226.
53. Tacq, J. (2011) ‘Causality in qualitative and quantitative research’, Quality and Quantity, 45(2), pp. 263–291.
54. Tat, U. & Zeitel-Bank, N. (2013). Self Leadership Development: The Link Between Body, Mind, And Reflection. International conference 2013 Zadar. Croatia: Management, Knowledge and Learning.
55. Trusler, Ingrid. (2018) The relationship between self-leadership and shared leadership on team performance. Pretoria: The Gordon institute of Business Science, University of Pretoria.
56. Turban, D. B., Moake, T. R. and Wu, S. Y. (2017) ‘Linking Extroversion and Proactive Personality to Career Success : The Role of Mentoring Received and Knowledge’, Journal of Career Development, 44(1), pp. 20–33. doi: 10.1177/0894845316633788.
57. West, Richard and Lynn H. Turner.IntroducinCommunicatioTheory: Analysis andApplication. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin. 2007.
58. Wood, C. (2004) Organizational Behavior. 3rd Editio. Australia: Jhon Wily & Son Australia Ltd.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
