Some problems of learning the language of literary work

Authors

  • Erjanova Dilfuza Kadirbaevna PhD) Doctoral candidate, Karakalpak State University Author
  • K. Pakhratdinov Scientific supervisor: associate professor Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/sa3yjn78

Keywords:

Karakalpak language, literary work, lingua-poetic analysis, portable meaning, synonym, antonym, homonym, assimilated words, phraseologism, proverb, words of attraction, phonetic circumstance

Abstract

Learning the language of literary work is very important for linguistics, any literary work describes the time reflection of the common language, its condition. The language of the literary work depends on the norms of literary language, its phonetic and grammatical laws, but it differs from the literary norms with its emotional-expressivity and its stylistic devices, it shows the poet’s own skill on choosing and using the words. When the language of the literary work is learned, it’s necessary to define how the writer or poet used the stylistic devices in the work, how he used the words to create the artistic character, his own skill on using the words and style. At that time the writer’s language features, his own style, the language features of the literary work will be discovered. In the article the lingua-poetic analysis of the language of the literary work is analyzed overall and discovered in the basis of the words with a portable meaning, synonyms, antonyms, homonyms, assimilated words, phraseologisms, proverbs, focus words and phonetic circumstances in the language of poems by the Karakalpak national poet I.Yusupov.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Berdimuratov E. K voprosu razvitiya leksiki stilya khudojestvennoy literaturi v karakalpakskom yazike. //Nekotoroye voprosi yazikaznanie, Nukus,1979, p. 3-15.

2. Vinogradov V.V. Stilistika. Teoriya poeticheskoy rechi. Poetika. М., 1963. – 255 p.

3. Jirmunskiy V.M. Teoriya literature. Poetika. Stilistika.–L.,1977. – p407.

4. Potebnya A.A. Estetika I poetika. – М., 1976. – p614.

5. Pakhratdinov Q., Erjanova D.The Lexical Features of I. Yusupov’s Poems. International Journal Of Research. 2019, 225-233 p (Volume 06. Issue 04. April 2019).

6. Shmelev D. N. Slovo I obraz. М., 1964, p119.

7. Scherba L.V. Izbrannie raboti po russkomu yaziku. Моscow, 1957. – 188 p.

8. Yusupov I.Tan’lamali shig’armalari. U’shtomliq. III volume. Nukus, Bilim, 2018. – 352 p.

Downloads

Published

31.10.2020

How to Cite

Kadirbaevna, E. D., & Pakhratdinov, K. (2020). Some problems of learning the language of literary work. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(8), 6492-6498. https://doi.org/10.61841/sa3yjn78