Sociolinguistic Features of Facebook Shares of College Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/hs0dz682Keywords:
language, communication, Facebook, computer-mediated, sociolinguisticsAbstract
Since it is a known fact that the young generation is hooked to a variety of gadgets together with internet connectivity, social media has been an everyday part of their lives. Updating of statuses in their own profile pages becomes now an integral means of self-expression in the cyber community worldwide. This study aims to investigate the trends and patterns in their online communication messages. With an informed consent of the college students who were selected through purposive sampling, content analysis of 83 submitted corpus of their Facebook posts was done. Results reveal that Facebook users have a variety of intentions when sharing updates in their status posts which suggests both positive and negative intentions. Facebook users update their walls with message contents that are addressed to oneself, other people, and even to non-human target receivers. The openness of thoughts and directness of speech in the messages suggests the comfort and security students feel when sharing in Facebook. As the tendencies in online messaging were presented, it is recommended that media literacy be integrated in the curriculum across different programs.
Downloads
References
1. Boxer, Diana. (2002). Applying Sociolinguistics: Domains and face-to-face interaction. IMPACT: Studies in Language and Society. Vol. 15. John Benjamins Publishing. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.ph/books?id=ZBdAFfRONT0C&dq=importance
2. Chun, D. M. (2015) Language and culture learning in higher education via telecollaboration,Pedagogies: An International Journal, 10:1, 5-21. Retrieved from DOI: 10.1080/1554480X.2014.999775
3. DeVito, Joseph A. (2002). Essentials of Human Communication. 4th ed. Allyn and Bacon.
4. Goffman, Ervin. (1959). Dramaturgical Approach to Interactionist Perspective.
5. Hendley, V. (2000). 30 years of higher education. AAHE Bulletin, 52(7), 3–8.
6. Kumlachew, Sileshie Semahagne. (2014). Challenges and opportunities of Facebook as a media platform in Ethiopia. Journal of Media and Comunication Studies. Vol. 6 (7), 99-110.
7. Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). New York, NY: The Free Press
8. Sapir, Edward and Whorf, Benjamin Lee., 1958. Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis.
9. Schieffelin, B. B. & E Ochs, E. (1986) Language Socialization. Annual Review of Anthropology. 15:1, 163-191
10. Walther, Joseph B. (1996). Hyperpersonal communication. Retrieved from Andrew F. Wood and Mathew
J. Smith. Online Communication: Linking Technology, Identity, and Culture.
11. Kozinsky, Zieva (2017). How Generation Z Is Shaping The Change In Education. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com /sites/sievakozinsky/2017/07/24/how-generation-z-is-shaping-the-change-in-education/#12dbd069652
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
