A view on bio-linguistic approach towards language learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/9s9en075Keywords:
Bio-linguistic approach, Usage-Based Approach, Language learning, comparison, Universal Grammar, Structure-based, Continuity AssumptionAbstract
THIS paper deals with the bio-linguistic approach towards learning a language and its procurement. The bio-linguistic approach is being compared with the usage based methodology. It is very much certain that the bio-linguistic approach is incomparable with that of any other in light of the fact that it gives increasingly precise and progressively broad views towards the various aspects of human dialects, just as a superior record of the ways youngsters gain human dialects. Recognizing these records, we move around how kid and grown-up language contrast in sentence creation and in sentence understanding. It would be clear that the contrasts oppose clarification utilizing the psychological systems that are summoned by the usage based methodology. Interestingly, the bio-linguistic approach clarifies the subjective parametric contrasts among youngster and grown-up language. Clarifying how youngster and grown-up language contrast and showing that kids see solidarity notwithstanding evident decent variety are due to the signs of the bio-linguistic approach to deal with language obtaining.
Downloads
References
1. Chomksy, N. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Chomsky, N. 1980. Rules and representations. New York: Columbia University Press
3. Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., & Lieven, E. V. 2014. Child language acquisition: Why universal grammar doesn't help. Language, 90(3), e53-e90.
4. Ambridge, B., Rowland, C., & Pine, J. 2008. Is structure dependence an innate constraint: Experimental evidence from children’s complex-question production. Cognitive Science, 32, 222-255
5. Lieven, E. V. M. 2010. Input and first language acquisition: Evaluating the role of frequency. Lingua 120, 2546-2556.
6. Lieven E, V. M. & Tomasello M. 2008. Children’s first language acquisition from a usage- based perspective. In: Robinson P, Ellis NC, (Eds.) Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. New York: Rutledge; 2008.
7. Cowie, F. 1999. What’s within: Nativism reconsidered. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Cowie, F. 2010. Innateness and language, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy(Summer 2010 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL:<http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2010/entries/innateness- language/>.
9. Ambridge, B. & Lieven, E.V. 2011. Child language acquisition: Contrasting theoretical approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
