Spiritual Quotient and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/vt1s9h22Keywords:
Spiritual Quotient, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, outer model, inner modelAbstract
This study aims to (1) test the measurement model (outer model) of Spiritual Quotient developed by Milliman et al. and the measurement model of Organizational Citizenship Behavior developed by Podsakoff et al., (2) examine the structural model (inner model) of Spiritual Quotient and Organizational Citizenship Behavior, and (3) test the hypothesis of the influence of Spiritual Quotient on Organizational Citizenship Behavior. The research sample was taken in a convenient manner from the population of lecturers of Tarumanagara University, Jakarta in 2018. Data were processed using Smart Partial Least Square. The results of this study indicate that: (1) Milliman et al.'s Spiritual Quotient measurement model and Podsakoff et al.’s Organizational Citizenship Behavior measurement model are valid and reliable after deleting several indicators that do not meet the requirements, (2) the relationship of Spiritual Quotient with Organizational Citizenship Behavior is positive but weak, and (3) the effect of Spiritual Quotient on Organizational Citizenship Behavior is quite significant at a 5% confidence level.
Downloads
References
1. Ahmad, A. dan Z. Omar. 2015. Improving organizational citizenship behavior through spirituality and work engagement. American Journal of Applied Sciences 12 (3): 200-207.
2. Anbugeetha, D. 2015. An analysis of the spiritual intelligence self report inventory.
International Journal of Management 6 (7): 25-36.
3. Anwar, Md., A. dan A. A. M. O. Gani. 2015. The effects of spiritual intelligence and its dimensions on organizational citizenship behaviour. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management 8 (4): 1162-1178.
4. Ashmos, D. P. dan D. Duchon. 2000. Spirituality at work a conceptualization and measure.
Journal of Management Inquiry 9 (2): 134-145.
5. Austin, P., J. Macdonald, dan R. MacLeod. 2018. Measuring spirituality and religiosity in clinical settings: A scoping review of available instruments. Religions 9 (70): 1-14.
6. Bhullar, A. 2015. The growth of spiritual intelligence. Indian Journal of Educational Studies: An Interdisciplinary Journal 2 (1): 122-131.
7. Charoensukmongkol, P., J. L. Daniel, dan R. C. Jardon. 2015. The contribution of workplace spirituality to organizational citizenship behavior. Advances in Business Research 6: 32-45.
8. Eyupoglu, S. Z. 2016. The organizational citizenship behaviour of academic staff in north cyprus. Procedia Economics and Finance 39: 701-704.
9. Fallah, V., S. Khosroabadi, dan H. Usefi. 2015. Development of emotional quotient and spiritual quotient: The strategy of ethics development. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 49: 43-52.
10. Fisher, J. 2013. You can’t beat relating with god for spiritual well-being: Comparing a generic version with the original spiritual well-being questionnaire called SHALOM, Religions 4: 325-335.
11. Ghorbanifar, M. dan F. Azma. 2014. Workplace spirituality and organizational citizenship behavior: Evidence from banking industry. Management Science Letters 4: 1685-1692.
12. Guilherme, C., G. R. Ribeiro, S. Caldeira, C. M. Zamarioli, A. R. S. O. Kumakura, A. M. Almeida, dan E. C. de Carvalho. 2016. Effect of the “spiritual support” intervention on spirituality and the clinical parameters of women who have undergone mastectomy: A pilot study. Religions 7 (26): 2-11.
13. Ghozali, I. 2011. Structural equation modeling, metode alternatif dengan partial least square. Bandung: Universitas Diponegoro.
14. Hertz, S. dan H. H. Friedman. 2015. Why spirituality belongs in the finance and accounting curricula. Journal of Accounting and Finance 15 (5): 11-25.
15. Hunsaker, W. D. 2017. Spiritual leadership and organizational citizenship behavior: Exploring the conditional effects of self-determination and confucian mindset. International Journal of Business and Society 18 (3): 485-502.
16. Islam, M. S. dan S. A. F. Afroz. 2015. Factor affecting organizational citizenship behaviour of corporate sector in Bangladesh. European Journal of Business and Management 7 (31): 7-17.
17. Kumar, S. dan Aradya G. B. 2017. The influence of spiritual intelligence on ethical behaviour in ITES organizations with respect to bengaluru. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation IV (IV): 46-51.
18. Kumar, M. M. dan S. A. Shah. 2015. Psychometric properties of podsakoff’s organizational citizenship behaviour scale in the asian context. The International Journal of Indian Psychology 3 (1): 51-60.
19. Louis, W. J. Fry dan C. G. Wigglesworth. 2013. Toward a theory of spiritual intelligence and spiritual leader development. International Journal on Spirituality and Organization Leadership 1 (1): 47-79.
20. McGhee, P. dan P. Grant. 2015. The influence of managers’ spiritual mindfulness on ethical behaviour in organizations. Journal of Spirituality, Leadership and Management 8 (1): 12-33.
21. Milliman, J., A. J. Czaplewski, dan J. Ferguson. 2003. Workplace spirituality and employee work attitudes: An exploratory empirical assessment. Journal of Organizational Change Management 16 (4): 426-447.
22. Moosapour, S., M. Feizi, dan H. Alipour. 2013. Spiritual intelligence relationship with organizational citizenship behavior of high school teachers in germi city. Journal of Business Management & Social Sciences Research 2 (10): 72-75.
23. Murniati, J. 2017. Era Disrupsi: Tantangan dan Peluang bagi PT anggota APTIK, paper yang dipresentasikan dalam Hari Studi APTIK: 1-12. http://aptik.or.id/warta-aptik/Era%20DisrupsiTantangan%20dan%20Peluang%20bagi%20PT%20anggota%20APTIK-Murniati(1).pdf.
24. Nazir, S. dan S. Malik. 2013. Workplace spirituality as predictor of workplace attitudes among pakistani doctors. Science Journal of Psychology: 1-6.
25. Organ, D. W. 1997. Organizational citizenship behavior: It’s construct clean-up time. Human Performance 10 (2): 85-97.
26. Oxford Living English Dictionaries. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/thesaurus/spirit
27. Podsakoff, N. P., S. W. Whiting, dan P. M. Podsakoff. 2009. Individual-and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 94 (1): 122-141.
28. Rayung, M. N. dan A. S. Ambotang. 2018. The influence of emotional and spiritual intelligence on the high school student outcomes. Journal of Education and Social Policy 5
(1): 211-220.
29. Safara, M. dan M. S. Bhatia. 2013. Spiritual intelligence. Delhi Psichiatry Journal 16 (2): 412-423.
30. Sharma, S. K. dan O. P. Sharma. 2016. Spirituality leads to happiness: A correlative study.
The International Journal of Indian Psychology 3 (2): 51-54.
31. Singh, N. dan B. D. Kolekar. 2015. Testing reliability of organizational citizenship behavior scale for non-teaching staff in academics. International Journal of Management 6 (9): 55-66.
32. Singh, M. P. dan J. Sinha. 2013. Impact of spiritual intelligence on quality of life.
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications 3 (5): 1-5.
33. Vishnu, C. dan J. S. Krishnan. 2018. Lessons of spiritual quotient for the millennials based on the insights from Ramayana. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 118
(22): 1049-1053.
34. Yildiz, S. M. 2016. The effect of internal marketing on organizational citizenship behavior of academic staff in higher educational institutions. Universal Journal of Educational Research 4
(5): 1122-1128.
35. Zhang, D. 2011. Organizational citizenship behaviour. Psych761 White Paper: 1-14.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
