Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/c1vc8y69Keywords:
SOEs, Procurement of Goods or Services, Ethics of Procurement of Goods or ServicesAbstract
The current study was conducted to determine whether the participation of SOEs in the procurement of goods or services in Indonesia is a violation of ethics or not, considering a form of ethical violations is when there are several business entities participate in the same Tender / Selection, controlled either directly or indirectly by the same parties, and / or share more than 50% ownership, even though there is a minimum of 51% of state ownership in SOEs. A normative research, this study has a statutory and conceptual approach. Based on this study, it was found that the involvement of two or more SOEs in the same Tender / Bids is a violation of ethics in the procurement of goods and services. In the event that a violation of ethics is not limited to ethical sanctions, but also legal sanctions, given the ethical norms have been stipulated in the positive law (in this context is the president’s decree)
Downloads
References
1. K. V. Thai, “Public Procurement Re-Examined,” Journal of Public Procurement, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 9, 2001.
2. H. Meilisa, “KPK Sebut 80% Korupsi Terkait Pengadaan Barang atau jasa,” February 28, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://news.detik.com/berita-jawa-timur/d-4448060/kpk-sebut-80-korupsi-terkait-pengadaan-barang-dan-jasa. [Accessed February 2, 2020].
3. B. Muqoddas, “Perpres Pengadaan Barang/Jasa di Tengah Raung Korupsi,” November 2, 2015. [Online]. Available: http://www.bpkp.go.id/sulut/berita/read/15080/190/Perpres-Pengadaan-BarangJasa-Di-Tengah-Raung-Korupsi.bpkp. [Accessed February 2, 2020].
4. Ihsanuddin, “LKPP: Korupsi Pengadaan Barang atau jasa Peringkat 2 di KPK,” November 6, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2019/11/06/11253441/lkpp-korupsi-pengadaan-barang-dan-jasa-peringkat-2-di-kpk. [Accessed January 28, 2020].
5. W. N. Mokogi, C. Mairura, and K. Ombui, “Effects of Procurement Practices on the Performance of Commercial State Owned Enterprises in Nairoby County,” International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, vol. 5, no. 6, p. 1, June 2015.
6. R. Setino and I. M. Ambe, “Supply Chain Management Practices in State-Owned Enterprises Environment,” Risk Governance & Control: Financial Markets & Institution, vol. 6, no. 4, p.381, 2016.
7. A. M. Kutosi, S. Eya, and M. Moses, “Contracting and Procurement Performance of State Owned Enterprises in Uganda,” Global Advanced Research Journal of Social Science, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 2, July 2015.
8. S. M. Wagner, “Intensity and Managerial Scope of Supplier Integration,” Journal of Supply Chain Management, vol. 39, no. 3, p. 4-13, 2003.
9. S.Firdha, “Poin Penting Pada Perpres No. 16 Tahun 2018 tentang Pengadaan yang Perlu Diketahui,” March 26, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.eproc.id/berita/detail/poin-penting-pada-perpres-no-
16-tahun-2018-tentang-pengadaan-yang-perlu-diketahui. [Accessed January 31, 2020].
10. D. Purwiyanti, “Analisis Kinerja Berbasis Konsep Value For Money pada Kegiatan Fisik Pekerjaan Irigasi Doggala Kodi (Study di Dinas Pekerjaan Umum Kota Palu),” Jurnal Katalogis, vol. 5, no. 3, p.190, 2017.
11. K. Matthew, K. Patrick, and K. Denise, “The Effect of Fraudulent Procurement Practices on Public Procurement Performance,” International Journal of Business and Behavioral Science, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 17, January 2013.
12. H. Hamkah and H. Purwanto, “Kajian Etika Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah,” Jurnal Simetrik, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 109, 2018.
13. A. Purwadi, “Praktik Persekongkolan Tender Pengadaan Barang atau jasa Pemerintah,” Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus, vol. 2, no. 2, p.99, August 2019.
14. A. Purnama, D. Handoko, and M. Rumita, “Tinjauan Yuridis tentang Persekongkolan Tender (Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999),” Privat Law 1, vol. 2, no. 4, p.2, 2014.
15. D. Banjarnahor, “Ini 8 Direksi BUMN di Zaman Rini Soemarno yang Terjerat KPK,” October 3, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20191003185044-4-104308/ini-8-direksi-bumn-di-zaman-rini-soemarno-yang-terjerat-kpk. [Accessed January 30, 2020].
16. I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani, “Korupsi Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah: Realitas Antagonis dalam Perwujudan Prinsip Clean Governance di Indonesia,” MMH, vol. 42, no 1, p.9, January 2013.
17. A. Cahyadi, “Penerapan Prinsip-Prinsip Good Corporate Governance dalam Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Secara Elektronik (E-Procurement di Lingkungan Badan Usaha Milik Negara,” DIH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 14, no. 28, p.76-77, August 2018-January 2019.
18. B. Sunggono, Metodelogi Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2005, p. 102.
19. N.Xavier et al., “2019, Rekonstruksi Batas Usia Minimal Perkawinan Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Perempuan (Analisa Putusan MK No. 22/Puu-Xv/2017)”, Lex Scientia, vol.3, no.1, p.43, May 2019.
20. H. M. Fauzan and B. Siagian, Kamus Hukum & Yurisprudensi, Depok, Kencana, 2017, p. 154.
21. D. S. Jones, “Public Procurement in Southeast Asia: Challenge and Reform,” Journal of Public Procurement, vol. 7, no. 1, p. , 8, 2007.
22. I. Rahadiyan, “Kedudukan BUMN Persero sebagai Separate Legal Entity dalam Kaitannya dengan Pemisahan Keuangan Negara pada Permodalan BUMN,” Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, vol. 20, no. 4, p.627-628, October 2013.
23. Lembaga Kebijakan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah, “Peraturan Presiden Nomor 16 Tahun 2018 tentang Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah,” [Online]. Available: http://berkas.dpr.go.id/setjen/dokumen/ittama-Knowledge-Sharing-Bahan-Sosialisasi-Peraturan-Presiden-Nomor-16-Tahun-2018-tentang-Pengadaan-BarangJasa-Pemerintah-1524134653.pdf. [Accessed February 5, 2020].
24. Y. Arifardhani, “Kemandirian Badan Usaha Milik Negara: Persinggungan Antara Hukum Privat dan Hukum Publik,” Jurnal Hukum Kenotariat, vol. 1, no. 1, p.57, January 2019.
25. A. Mahyani, “Tanggung Jawab Pidana Direksi BUMN yang Merugi,” Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, vol.2, no. 1, p.1-2, February 2019.
26. H. Kasim, “Memikirkan Kembali Pengawasan Badan Usaha Milik Negara Berdasarkan Business Judgement Rules,” Jurnal Konstitusi, vol. 14, no.2, p.443, June 2017.
27. M. J. Maria, W. Githii, O. T. Ombati, “Ethics and Procurement Performance of Humanitarian Organizations in Kenya,” American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 8, p. 836-837, 2018.
28. I. M. Ambe, “Public Procurement Trends and Developments in South Africa,” Research Journal of Business and Management, vol. 3, no. 4, p. 279, 2016.
29. A. Eyo, “Corruption and the Challenge to Sustainable Public Procurement (SPP): A Perspective on Africa,” Eurpean Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review, vol. 12, no. 3, p. 255, 2017.
30. A. Purnama, D. Handoko, dan M. Rumita, “Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang Persekongkolan Tender (Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999),” Privat Law, p.2, 2014.
31. S. Manyathi, “An Analysis of Various Types of Supply Chain Management Systems: Case of Global Public Sector versus Private Sector Procurement,” Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Management Studies, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 13, 2017.
32. L. Xuexin, “On Procurement Management in China’s Big State-owned Enterprises,” 2nd International Conference on Science and Social Research, p. 301, 2013.
33. A. N. Lema and N. P. Mrope, “Determinants of Ethical Procurement Practices in Public Entities in Tanzania: A Case Study of the National Audit Office (NAO) Headquarters, Dar Es Salaam,” International Journal of Innovative Research & Development, vol. 7, no. 10, p.229, October 2018.
34. Z. H. Elia and M. N. Erasmus, “Ethical Conduct of Procurement Officials and Implications on Case Study of Limpopo Provincial Treasury,” Public and Municipal Finance, vol. 4, no. 3, p. 17, 2015.
35. J. Ndolo and E. Njagi, “Role of Ethics in Procurement Process Effectiveness in the Water Sector in Kenya: (A Case Study of EWASCO, Embu County),” IJSCM, vol. 3, no. 3, p. 132, September 2014.
36. Humas, “BUMN/D dan BLU Boleh Atur Tata Cara Pengadaan Sendiri,” November 13, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://jogjaprov.go.id/berita/detail/bumn-d-dan-blu-boleh-atur-tata-cara-pengadaan-sendiri. [Accessed February 5, 2020].
37. A. Cahyadi, “Penerapan Prinsip-Prinsip Good Corporate Governance dalam Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Secara Elektronik (E-Procurement di Lingkungan Badan Usaha Milik Negara,” DIH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 14, no. 28, p.77, August 2018-January 2019.
38. A. Nurmandi and S. Kim, “Making e-procurement work in a decentralized procurement system A comparison of three Indonesian cities,” International Journal of Public Sector Management, vol. 28, no. 3, p.201, 2015.
39. S. Dyah Nayabarani, “Membangun Transparansi Pengadaan Barang atau jasa Melalui Peningkatan Peran ICT dalam Mereduksi Korupsi,” Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, vol. 47, no.4, p. 486, 2017.
40. A. Licenji, “Standards and Challenges of Public Procurement,” European Scientific Journal, vol. 11, no. 25, p.239, September 2015.
41. Ahmad, Latif, Yi He, Andrew J. Semotiuk, Quan Ru Liu, Hammad Ahmad Jan, and . 2019. Pan-Himalaya Ethnomedicine safety: Lithospermeae (Boraginaceae) Herbal Remedies Containing Toxic Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids. Journal of Complementary Medicine Research, 10 (3), 129-
141. doi:10.5455/jcmr.20190513073648
42. Morgado, M., Rolo, S., MacEdo, A., Pereira, L., Castelo-Branco, M.Predictors of uncontrolled hypertension and antihypertensive medication nonadherence(2010) Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research, 1 (4), pp. 196-202. DOI: 10.4103/0975-3583.74263
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
