COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF SHEAR BOND STREANGTH OF SEVENTH GENERATION ADHESIVE SYSTEM TO WMTA AND BIODENTINE: AN IN VITRO STUDY

Authors

  • Sneha R. Mali 1 Senior Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics,School of Dental Sciences,Kristna Institute of Medical Sciences Deemed To Be University Karad Dist-Satara, Maharashtra, INDIA Author
  • T.M. Mangala Senior Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics,School of Dental Sciences,Kristna Institute of Medical Sciences Deemed To Be University Karad Dist-Satara, Maharashtra, INDIA Author
  • Abhijeet Phase Post Graduate and Corrosponding Author School of Dental Sciences,Kristna Institute of Medical Sciences Deemed To Be University Karad Dist-Satara, Maharashtra, INDIA Author
  • Rushikesh Mahaparale Reader, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics,School of Dental Sciences,Kristna Institute of Medical Sciences Deemed To Be University Karad Dist-Satara, Maharashtra, INDIA Author
  • Adish Saraf Senior lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics,School of Dental Sciences,Kristna Institute of Medical Sciences Deemed To Be University Karad Dist-Satara, Maharashtra, INDIA Author
  • Sagar Pawar Senior lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics,School of Dental Sciences,Kristna Institute of Medical Sciences Deemed To Be University Karad Dist-Satara, Maharashtra, INDIA Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/wnswzn65

Keywords:

Adhesive, Biodentine, ,Bonding Agent, Composite

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed for similar assessment of shear bond quality of seventh generation bonding system with MTA and Biodentine. Materials and Methods: 80 acrylic blocks with central hole of 4mm diameter & 2mm height were prepared. 40 acrylic cylindrical blocks were completely loaded up with MTA (Group 1) & another 40 with Biodentine (Group2). Samples were put away for 72 hours at 37°C with 100% humidity. Samples from each group were randomly divided into different 2 groups of 20 each Group 1A: MTA WITH BONDING AGENT ;Group 1B: MTA WITHOUT BONDING AGENT (control);Group 2A: BIODENTINE WITH BONDING AGENT; Group 2B: BIODENTINE

WITHOUT BONDING AGENT (control).A composite material (Clearfil Mejesty) applied into plastic matrix of cylindrical shaped with an internal diameter of 2mm and height of 2 mm. light-emitting diode light-curing unit was used with an intensity of 1,200mV/cm2 for 20 seconds for Light curing. The polymerized samples were put away for 24 hours in 100% relative humidity at 37°C. In universal testing machine samples were made sure about in a holder set on the platen at that point sheared with a blade edge sharp edge At Cross head speed: 1 mm/minute. Examination of fractured samples test were done under a stereomicroscope. Analysis of obtained Data were done Results: At the

 

 

point when shear bond qualities of adhesive system were analyzed, no noteworthy contrasts were found between both control groups. (p > .05).the bond strength of group 2A introduced altogether higher bond quality values (48.15 MPa) than group 1A (28.51Mpa) (p < .05). Most of the observed modes of failure were cohesive than that of adhesive in both group 1A and 2A.Comparatively Cohesive fractures were more seen in Biodentin than that of MTA.Group 1B and group 2B(control groups) showed more adhesive failure compare to cohesive and mixed.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Adish Saraf, Senior lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics,School of Dental Sciences,Kristna Institute of Medical Sciences Deemed To Be University Karad Dist-Satara, Maharashtra, INDIA
    1.  

References

1) Al-Hiyasat AS, Barrieshi-Nusair KM, Al-Omari MA. The radiographic outcomes of direct pulp-capping procedures performed by dental students: a retrospective study. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2006 Dec 31;137(12):1699-705.

2) Ward J. Vital pulp therapy in cariously exposed permanent teeth and its limitations. Australian Endodontic Journal. 2002 Apr 1;28(1):29-37.

3) Cvek M. A clinical report on partial pulpotomy and capping with calcium hydroxide in permanent incisors with complicated crown fracture. Journal of endodontics. 1978 Jan 1;4(8):232-7.

4) Ricketts D. Restorative dentistry: management of the deep carious lesion and the vital pulp dentine complex. British dental journal. 2001 Dec 8;191(11):606-10.

5) Stanley HR. Pulp capping: conserving the dental pulp—can it be done? Is it worth it?. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology. 1989 Nov 1;68(5):628-39.

6) Modena KC, Casas-Apayco LC, Atta MT, Costa CA, Hebling J, Sipert CR, Navarro MF, Santos CF. Cytotoxicity and biocompatibility of direct and indirect pulp capping materials. Journal of Applied Oral Science. 2009 Dec;17(6):544-54.

7) Demarco FF, Rosa MS, Tarquínio SB, Piva E. Influence of the restoration quality on the success of pulpotomy treatment: a preliminary retrospective study. Journal of Applied Oral Science. 2005 Mar;13(1):72-7.

8) Lee SJ, Monsef M, Torabinejad M. Sealing ability of a mineral trioxide aggregate for repair of lateral root perforations. Journal of endodontics. 1993 Nov 1;19(11):541-4.

9) Parirokh M, Torabinejad M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review—part I: chemical, physical, and antibacterial properties. Journal of endodontics. 2010 Jan 31;36(1):16-27.

10) Dammaschke T, Gerth HU, Züchner H, Schäfer E. Chemical and physical surface and bulk material characterization of white ProRoot MTA and two Portland cements. Dental Materials. 2005 Aug 31;21(8):731-8.

11) Nowicka A, Lipski M, Parafiniuk M, Sporniak-Tutak K, Lichota D, Kosierkiewicz A, Kaczmarek W, Buczkowska-Radlińska J. Response of human dental pulp capped with biodentine and mineral trioxide aggregate. Journal of endodontics. 2013 Jun 30;39(6):743-7.

12) Agrafioti A, Tzimpoulas N, Chatzitheodoridis E, Kontakiotis EG. Comparative evaluation of sealing ability and microstructure of MTA and Biodentine after exposure to different environments. Clinical oral investigations. 2016 Sep 1;20(7):1535-40.

13) Jeevani E, Jayaprakash T, Bolla N, Vemuri S, Sunil CR, Kalluru RS. Evaluation of sealing ability of MM- MTA, Endosequence, and biodentine as furcation repair materials: UV spectrophotometric analysis. Journal of conservative dentistry: JCD. 2014 Jul;17(4):340.

14) Shetty S, Hiremath G, Yeli M. A comparative evaluation of sealing ability of four root end filling materials using fluid filtration method: An in vitro study. Journal of conservative dentistry: JCD. 2017 Sep;20(5):307.

15) Torabinejad M, Chivian N. Clinical applications of mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod 1999; 25: 197- 205.

16) Schmitt D, Lee J, Bogen G. Multifaceted use of TK/f ProRoot MTA root canal repair material. Am Acad Pediatr Dent 2001; 23:326 330.

17) Eidelman E, Holan G, Fuks AB. Mineral trioxide aggregate vs. formocresol in pulpotomized primary molars: a preliminary report. Pediatr Dent 2001; 23: 15-18.

18) Giuliani V, Baccetti T, Pace R, Pagavino G. The use of MTA in teeth with necrotic pulps and open apices. ent Traumatol 2002; 18: 217-221.

19) Maroto M, Barbería E, Vera V, García-Godoy F. Mineral trioxide aggregate as pulp dressing agent in pulpotomy treatment of primary molars: 42-month clinical study. Am J Dent 2007; 20: 283-286.

20) Roberts HW, Toth JM, Berzins DW, Charlton DG. Mineral trioxide aggregate material use in endodontic treatment: a review of the literature. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 149-164.

21) Osorio RM, Hefti A, Vertucci FJ, Shawley AL. Cytotoxicity of endodontic materials. J Endod 1998; 24: 91-96.

22) Koh ET, Torabinejad M, Pitt Ford TR, Brady K, McDonald F. Mineral trioxide aggregate stimulates a biological response in human osteoblasts. J Biomed Mater Res 1997; 37: 432-439.

23) Thomson TS, Berry JE, Somerman MJ, Kirkwood KL. Cementoblasts maintain expression of osteocalcin in the presence of mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod 2003; 29: 407-412.

24) Tziafas D, Pantelidou O, Alvanou A, Belibasakis G, Papadimitriou S. The dentinogenic effect of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) in short-term capping experiments. Int Endod J 2002; 35: 245-254.

25) Stowe TJ, Sedgley CM, Stowe B, Fenno JC. The effects of chlorhexidine gluconate (0.12％) on the antimicrobial properties of tooth-colored ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod 2004; 30: 429- 431.

26) Iwamoto CE, Adachi E, Pameijer CH, Barnes D, Romberg EE, Jefferies S. Clinical and histological evaluation of white ProRoot MTA in direct pulp capping. Am J Dent 2006; 19: 85-90.

27) X.V. Tran, C.Gorin, C.Willig et al., “Effect of a calcium-silicatebased restorative cement on pulp repair,”

Journal of Dental Research, vol. 91, no. 12, pp. 1166–1171, 2012.

28) Davidson CL, de Gee AJ, Feilzer A. The competition between the composite dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 1984; 63: 1396-1399.

29) Al-Sarheed MA. Evaluation of shear bond strength and SEM observation of all-in-one self-etching primer used for bonding of fissure sealants. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006; 7: 9-16.

30) Mesut Enes OdabaG,1 Mehmet Bani,1 and Resmiye Ebru Tirali2 Shear Bond Strengths of Different Adhesive Systems to Biodentine. The ScientificWorld Journal Volume 2013, Article ID 626103.

31) Pashley EL, Agee KA, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Effects of one versus two applications of an unfilled, all-inone adhesive on dentine bonding. J Dent 2002; 30: 83-90.

Downloads

Published

31.10.2020

Issue

Vol. 24 No. 8 (2020): 24 (8) 2020

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

How to Cite

Mali, S. R., Mangala, T., Phase, A., Mahaparale, R., Saraf, A., & Pawar, S. (2020). COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF SHEAR BOND STREANGTH OF SEVENTH GENERATION ADHESIVE SYSTEM TO WMTA AND BIODENTINE: AN IN VITRO STUDY. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(8), 929-936. https://doi.org/10.61841/wnswzn65