Governance Reform in Services Security and Order of Visit at Prison

Authors

  • Dr. Mochammad Rozikin, M.AP Brawijaya University Veteran Malang Stret, Malang, East Java, Indonesia, 65145 (0341) 55373 Author
  • Agung Edi Rustanto Brawijaya University Veteran Malang Stret, Malang, East Java, Indonesia, 65145 (0341) 55373 Author
  • Prof. Dr. Abdul Hakim M.Si Brawijaya University Veteran Malang Stret, Malang, East Java, Indonesia, 65145 (0341) 55373 Author
  • Wike Sos. Brawijaya University Veteran Malang Stret, Malang, East Java, Indonesia, 65145 (0341) 55373 Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/1c2c8t19

Keywords:

Governance reform, correctional services, the prison in Indonesia,, security and order, prisoners

Abstract

In general, prisons in Indonesia are attributed to overcapacity and a horrible standard facility, but there is one prison found the opposite problem. Still, instead, prisoners can enjoy luxury facilities that exceed the standard. One of the luxurious facilities enjoyed by the prisoner is the facility to receive visits. A prisoner in class 1 of Sukamiskin prison can receive visits with luxury facilities in the form of luxury halls built by the prisoners. Prisoners can order fancy foods from the restaurant to be sent to prison. Another problem is that the visit time is not according to the rules, where a prisoner can be visited until late at night. The irregularity of the visit to class 1 of Sukamiskin prison received the attention of the community. The Ministry of Law and Human Rights is urged to carry out governance reforms to improve security services and order traffic. Governance reform in Sukamiskin class 1 prison is carried out through several effective stages. The success of governance reforms in security services and orderliness of visits needs to be examined because it is essential to know the implementation process. This research applied the descriptive qualitative method with a case study approach in class 1 of Sukamiskin prison. Informants in this study were prison leadership officials, prison staff officers, prisoners, and visitors. The results of this study are governance reforms in class 1 of Sukamiskin prison succeeded in creating a safer and more orderly visit service. The entire visit service is carried out following the standards, both the facilities and the time of the visit.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Hikmawati, Puteri. (2018). “mendesaknya perbaikan pengelolaan prison pasca penangkapan kepala prison sukamiskin”. Info singkat 10 (15), 1-6.

2. Yuniarto, Topan. (2018). Politik dan Hukum. Litbang Kompas. Jakarta

3. Victor J. St. John et al., 2019. Architecture and Correctional Services: A Facilities Approach to treatment.

The Prison Journal 99(6), 748-770

4. Sandro Cabral and Paulo F. Azevedo. (2008). The Modes of Provision of Prison Services in a Comparative Perspective. Brazilian Administration Review 5(1), 53-69

5. Raymund E. Narag and Clarke R. Jones. (2017). Understanding Prison Management in the Philippines: A Case for Shared Governance. The Prison Journal 97(1), 3-26

6. Lynn, Lawrence E., Carolyn J. Heinrich, and Carolyn J. Hill. (2000). “Studying governance and public management: Challenges and prospects”. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10(2), 233-262

7. Sedarmayanti. (2009). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Reformasi Birokrasi dan Manajemen pegawai negeri sipil. Bandung. PT. Refika Aditama

8. Tritton, Pieter, and Fleetwood, Jennifer. (2017). “An Insiders View of Prison Reform in Ecuador Journal Prison Service, Special Edition Informal dynamics of survival in Latin American prisons.” Prison Service Journal 299, 40-44

9. Miriti, Gilbert M., and Kimani, Martin Wohoro. (2017). “Analysis of prisons rehabilitation programs on behavior Reformation of offenders in Kenya: a case study Of Kisumu Main Prison.” European Journal of Business and Social Sciences 6(6), 59-85

10. Bennett, Jamie. (2017). “Justice and penal reform: Re-shaping the penal landscape.” Prison Service Journal Special Edition. The Future of Prisons 231, 45-46

11. Lynn, Lawrence E., Carolyn J. Heinrich, and Carolyn J. Hill. (2001). Improving governance: A new logic for empirical research. Georgetown Univ. Press. Washington DC.

12. Zainal Arifin. (2012). Penelitian pendidikan metode dan paradigma baru. Bandung. PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.

13. Mudjia Rahardjo. (2017). Studi Kasus Dalam Penelitian Kualitatif: Konsep Dan Prosedurnya. Malang. Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim.

14. Creswell, Jhon W. (2016). Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan. Mixed. Yogyakarta. Pustaka Pelajar.

15. Goetz, Anne Marie. (2005). Managing Successful Governance Reforms: Lessons Of Design And Implementation Conceptual Framework. The UK. University of Sussex

16. Haryono. (2016). Pelaksanaan reformasi birokrasi di kementerian hukum dan ham. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum 10(3), 227-242

17. Martoyo, Susilo. (2000) Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jogjakarta. BPFE.

18. Werther, William B. & Keith Davis. (1996). Human Resources And Personnel Management. 5th Edition. McGraw-Hill. New York.

19. Satryawati and Saniah. (2012). “Peranan Tes Psikologi Terhadap Penempatan Pegawai Pada Politeknik Negeri Samarinda”. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis 08(2): 2-5

20. Zakki dkk. (2014). “Pengaruh Seleksi Terhadap Penempatan”. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis 14(1): 1-10

21. Hasibuan, Malayu. 2002. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta. Bumi Aksara

22. Andhika et. al. (2016). Tugas dan Kewenangan Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Ambawara Dalam Pembinaan Narapidana Sebagai Wujud Perlindungan Narapidana Sebagai Warga Negara. Diponegoro Law Journal 5(3), 1-16

23. Permana dan Rudatyo. (2017). Pelaksanaan sistem layanan kunjungan bagi warga binaan Pemasyarakatan di rumah tahanan negara wonogiri, Dalam rangka peningkatan pelayanan kepada publik berdasarkan uu no 12 tahun 1995 Tentang pemasyarakatan. Surakarta. Seminar Nasional dan Call for Paper UNIBA.

Downloads

Published

31.10.2020

How to Cite

Rozikin M.AP, D. M., Edi Rustanto, A., Haki M.Si., A., & Sos., W. (2020). Governance Reform in Services Security and Order of Visit at Prison. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(8), 579-586. https://doi.org/10.61841/1c2c8t19