Development and Validation of Instruments to Measure Students' E-Learning Readiness
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/ay3mev62Keywords:
instrument validation, e-learning readiness, Rasch modeling.Abstract
This research aims to develop and validate the used instruments to measure students' readiness to participate in learning through learning management systems. This readiness is known as e-learning readiness. The tool was developed based on four components of e-learning readiness by Ayd & Tasci's model, namely technology, innovation, people, and self-development. The research sample was students of the Elementary School Teacher Education Study Program, Universitas Negeri Makassar. The research used quantitative survey methods. The instrument developed consisted of 36 statement items, with responses in the form of a five-choice Likert scale. The data analysis testing used Rasch modeling through the Winstep program. The results of the study managed to develop an instrument of e-learning readiness, which consisted of 29 items statements under the model. The results of data analysis also showed that the reliability of the respondents was 0.93 and classified as very good. For reliability items, the results of data analysis showed 0.97 and classified as excellent. The result of raw variance explained by the measure of 50.1% also indicates that the requirements for unidimensionality are quite fair; this means the stated instrument is good enough in measuring what should be measured. Overall, therefore, this study has produced a device of e-learning readiness that can predict the availability of following the learning process.
Downloads
References
[1] Kenresearch, “Indonesia Digital Education and E-Learning Market Research Report, Industry Research Report, Market Major Players, Market Share - Ken Research.” .
[2] Selular.id, “Indonesia Masuk Top 10 Pertumbuhan E-Learning Di Seluruh Dunia - Selular.ID,” 2017. .
[3] Ristekdikti, “Menristekdikti targetkan ‘e-learning’ perguruan tinggi dilaksanakan 2018,” antaranews.com, 2017. .
[4] A. F. Rodli, A. Prasnowo, M. B. N. Wajdi, and S. Sajiyo, “Building a Culture of Learning to Accelerate the Advancement of Higher Learning,” in International Conference on Religion and Public Civilization (ICRPC 2018), 2018.
[5] N. B. S. Wangi, M. H. Nashrullah, and M. B. N. Wajdi, “Digital Era’s Education and Aplication in Higher Education,” EDUTEC J. Educ. Technol., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 119–128, 2018.
[6] I. Inayatulloh, “Pembangunan Model E-Learning di Perguruan Tinggi untuk Meningkatkan Efisiensi Belajar Mengajar,” ComTech Comput. Math. Eng. Appl., vol. 4, no. 2, p. 612, 2013, doi: 10.21512/comtech.v4i2.2484.
[7] F. Nadziroh, “Analisa Efektifitas Sistem Pembelajaran,” J. Ilmu Komput. Dan Desain Komun. Vis., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2017.
[8] S. Bibi and H. Jati, “Efektivitas model blended learning terhadap motivasi dan tingkat pemahaman mahasiswa mata kuliah algoritma dan pemrograman,” J. Pendidik. Vokasi, 2015, doi: 10.21831/jpv.v5i1.6074.
[9] I. Mutia, “Kajian Penerapan E-Learning Dalam Proses,” Fakt. Exacta, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 278–289, 2013.
[10] R. P. Yaniawati, “Pengaruh E-Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Daya Matematik Mahasiswa,” J. Cakrawala Pendidik., no. 3, pp. 381–393, 2013, doi: 10.21831/cp.v0i3.1137.
[11] J. P. Cuthell, Virtual learning: the impact of ict on the way young people work and learn. Singapore: Ashgate Publishing Co., 2002.
[12] M. Weller, Delivering learning on the net: The why, what & how of on line education. London: Kogan Page, 2002.
[13] M. B. N. Wajdi, “Dynamic Learning for the Arabic language,” EDUTEC J. Educ. Technol., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 25–31, 2019.
[14] W. H. Setyawan, A. Budiman, D. S. Wihara, T. Setyarini, R. Rahim, and M. B. N. Wajdi, “The effect of an android-based application on T-Mobile learning model to improve students’ listening competence,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2019, vol. 1175, no. 1, p. 12217.
[15] N. Kurniasih et al., “Internet and learning resources: a case study of the Library and Information Science Students at Universitas Padjadjaran,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2018, vol. 1114, no. 1, p. 12086.
[16] S. Azizah et al., “Blog Implications as Learning Media in Improving Learning Achievement of Students,” in
Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2019, vol. 1175, no. 1, p. 12260.
[17] S. H. Saputro et al., “Utilization of Whatsapp Application as Communication Media in Language Teaching and Learning at FBS UWKS,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2019, vol. 1175, no. 1, p. 12262.
[18] N. B. S. Wangi et al., “Gamification Framework and Achievement Motivation in Digital Era : Concept and Effectiveness,” Int. J. Eng. Technol., vol. 7, no. 3.6, pp. 429–431, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.14419/ijet.v7i3.6.17487.
[19] M. B. N. Wajdi et al., “Advancement of E-Book Through Automation System in Department of Islamic Education (STAI) Miftahul Ula Nganjuk,” Int. J. Eng. Technol., vol. 7, no. 3.6, pp. 438–441, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.14419/ijet.v7i3.6.17489.
[20] S. Borotis and A. Poulymenakou, “E-Learning Readiness Components: Key Issues to Consider Before Adopting e-Learning Interventions,” in Proceedings of E-Learn 2004--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, 2004, pp. 1622–1629.
[21] A. Saekow and D. Samson, “A study of e-learning readiness of Thailand’s higher education comparing to the United States of America (USA)’s case,” ICCRD2011 - 2011 3rd Int. Conf. Comput. Res. Dev., vol. 2, no. September, pp. 287–291, 2011, doi: 10.1109/ICCRD.2011.5764134.
[22] N. H. Waryanto and N. Insani, “Tingkat Kesiapan (Readiness) Implementasi E-Learning di Sekolah
Menengah Atas Kota Yogyakarta,” J. Pendidik. Mat. dan Sains, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 117–124, 2013, doi: 10.21831/jpms.v2i2.2478.
[23] N. H. Waryanto and W. Setyaningrum, “E-Learning Readiness In Indonesia: A Case Study In Junior High School Yogyakarta,” in Int. Semin. Innov. Math. Math. Educ. 1st ISIM-MED, 2014.
[24] Y. Prayudi, “Prosiding Seminar Nasional Aplikasi Teknologi Informasi (SNATI),” Kaji. Awal E-Learning REadiness Index Sebagai Model Bagi Eval. E-Learning pada Sebuah Institusi, vol. 2009, no. Snati, 2009.
[25] R. I. Fariani, “Pengukuran Tingkat Kesiapan E-Learning (E-Learning Readiness),” Semin. Nas. Apl. Teknol. Inf., pp. 1–7, 2013.
[26] H. B. Seta, T. Wati, and N. Matondang, “Analisis Pengukuran Tingkat Kesiapan Implementasi E-Learning ( E-Learning Readiness ) Studi Kasus : Upn ‘ Veteran ’ Jakarta,” Semin. Nas. Teknol. Inf. dan Multimed. 2016, pp. 2.5-1-2.5-6, 2016.
[27] P. Sari, D. Antoni, and S. Rizal, “Literatur Review tingkat kematangan E-Learning di Perguruan Tinggi Indonesia,” in Prosiding ANNUAL RESEARCH SEMINAR 2016, 2016, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–5.
[28] S. Chapnick, “Are you ready for e-learning?,” ASTD’s Online Magazine All About ELearning, 2000. .
[29] K. K. T. So and P. M. C. Swatman, “CollECTeR Europe 2006,” in Proceedings of CollECTeR Europe 2006, 2006, no. June, p. 121.
[30] D. Akaslan and E. L. C. Law, “Measuring teachers’ readiness for E-learning in higher education institutions associated with the subject of electricity in Turkey,” 2011 IEEE Glob. Eng. Educ. Conf. EDUCON 2011, pp. 481–490, 2011, doi: 10.1109/EDUCON.2011.5773180.
[31] M. Kaur, “Blended Learning - Its Challenges and Future,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 93, pp. 612–617, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.248.
[32] C. H. Aydin and D. Tasci, “Measuring readiness for e-learning: reflections from an emerging country,” J. Educ. Technol. Soc., vol. 8, no. 4, 2005.
[33] F. Alem, M. Plaisent, C. Zuccaro, and P. Bernard, “Measuring e-Learning Readiness Concept: Scale Development and Validation Using Structural Equation Modeling,” Int. J. e-Education, e-Business, e- Management e-Learning, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 193–207, 2016, doi: 10.17706/ijeeee.2016.6.4.193-207.
[34] Y. Xiong, H. J. So, and Y. Toh, “Assessing learners’ perceived readiness for computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL): a study on initial development and validation,” J. Comput. High. Educ., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 215–239, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s12528-015-9102-9.
[35] S. Hussin, M. Radzi Manap, Z. Amir, and P. Krish, “Mobile Learning Readiness among Malaysian Students at Higher Learning Institutes,” Asian Soc. Sci., vol. 8, no. 12, 2012, doi: 10.5539/ass.v8n12p276.
[36] S. N. Razali, F. Shahbodin, M. H. Ahmad, and H. A. Mohd Nor, “Measuring validity and reliability of perception of online collaborative learning questionnaire using rasch model,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 966–974, 2016, doi: 10.18517/ijaseit.6.6.1343.
[37] T. Rachman and D. B. Napitupulu, “Rasch Model for Validation a User Acceptance Instrument for Evaluating E-learning System,” CommIT (Communication Inf. Technol. J., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 9, 2017, doi: 10.21512/commit.v11i1.2042.
[38] P. C. Gugiu, M. R. Gugiu, M. Barnes, B. Gimbert, and M. Sanders, “The Development and Validation of the Parental Involvement Survey in their Children’s Elementary Studies (PISCES),” J. Child Fam. Stud., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 627–641, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10826-018-1294-y.
[39] M. Kusuma, P. Susongko, and Y. Arfiani, “Validation of the Instruments of Learning Readiness With E- Learning Using Rasch Modeling To Empower Technological Content Knowledge (Tck),” J. Pena Sains, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 18, 2019, doi: 10.21107/jps.v6i1.5030.
[40] D. Martin and R. Jamieson-Proctor, “Development and validation of a survey instrument for measuring pre- service teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge,” Int. J. Res. Method Educ., pp. 1–14, 2019, doi: 10.1080/1743727X.2019.1687669.
[41] J. Z. Singer, “A Rasch Analysis of a TPACK Assessment Instrument and Online K-12 Teachers in the United States,” The University of Toledo, 2016.
[42] T. G. Bond and C. M. Fox, Applying the Rasch model : fundamental measurement in the human sciences. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2015.
[43] S. Efendi and Tukiran., Metode Penelitian Survei. Jakarta: LP3ES, 2012.
[44] R. C. Bogdan and S. K. Biklen, “Foundations of qualitative research in education,” Qual. Res. Educ. An Introd. to theory methods, pp. 1–48, 1998.
[45] B. Sumintono and W. Widhiarso, Aplikasi Model Rasch Untuk Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 2nd ed. Bandung: Trim komunikata Publishing House, 2015.
[46] B. Sumintono and W. Widhiarso, Aplikasi Pemodelan Rasch Pada Asessment Pendidikan, 1st ed. Bandung: Penerbit Trim komunikata, 2015.
[47] Rasch.org, “Rating Scale Instrument Quality Criteria,” www.rasch.org, 2018. .
[48] A. H. H. Rohayani, Kurniabudi, and Sharipuddin, “A Literature Review: Readiness Factors to Measuring e- Learning Readiness in Higher Education,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 59, no. Iccsci, pp. 230–234, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.564.
[49] M. Coopasami, S. Knight, and M. Pete, “e-Learning readiness amongst nursing students at the Durban
University of Technology,” Heal. SA Gesondheid, vol. 22, pp. 300–306, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.hsag.2017.04.003.
[50] D. Rossiter and J. Watters, Technological Literacy: Foundations for the 21st century. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology, 2000.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
