Current Status of Semiotic Use
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/bhqvx150Keywords:
sign, semiotics, language, fluid, current status of disruptive innovation.Abstract
The state of sign and language is unstable. If it can be fluid that flows freely without intermittent
barriers. The change in disruptive innovation is a key factor in making the fluid sign/language no longer be static or frozen. The more we enter the digital age, the more the semiotics/language become more fluid so that we cannot separate truth from falsehood, accuracy leaves things wrong, real things out of illusions, freedom out of fuddle. And until he no longer knew his identity, because he was also trapped in the noose of illusion, for example, it reflects the sign, especially the language, as a fluid. It will have a more fluid state during the disruptive innovation era. As a result, the Langue is blended with Parole, especially in social media. It comes to the point that they cannot be separated as they are the languages of society. The disruptive innovation causes digital concepts to replace the analog ones, which makes that dualism approach of the sign. There is nothing between the with and the without of software development processing. Nevertheless, its application continues with a more realistic world flowing digital literacy also makes signs, languages, and codes become fluid.
Downloads
References
[1] Bailey, D, Resistance is futile? The impact of disruptive protest in the 'silver age of permanent austerity’ in Socio-Economic Review, 13(1). Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2014.
[2] Lewis, P, The Post-Structuralist Condition in Diacritics, 12(1) (pp. 2-24). The Johns Hopkins University Press, United State of America, 1982.
[3] Galantucci, B, Experimental Semiotics: A New Approach for Studying Communication as a Form of Joint Action in Top Cogn Sci, 1(2) (pp. 393-410). Wiley-Blackwell & the Cognitive Science Society, United State of America, 2009.
[4] Levin, S, Langue and Parole in American Linguistics in Foundations of Language International Journal of Language and Philosophy, Volume 1 (pp. 86-7). St. Paul, MN, Rulon-Miller Books, United State of America, 1965.
[5] Bickerton, D, Roots of Language, (p. 49). Language Science Press, Berlin, Germany,.2016.
[6] Sonnad, N, FORGET ME NOT, Quartz, New York, United State of America, 2018.
[7] Force, T. A, The Tongue and Quill, http://www.e-publishing.af.mil. ,2015.
[8] Timofeev, I, The World Order: New Parameters in A New Anarchy? Scenarios for World Order Dynamics, The Russian International Affairs Council, Russia, 6 August 2019.
[9] @Sowa, J, Regarding: It's misleading to say, without suitable qualifiers in Everything is a sign, ResearchGate, 2014.
[10] Sinha, C. Language and other, Artifacts: socio-cultural dynamics of niche construction in Frontiers in Psychology, 20 October, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015. 01601, 2015.
[11] Bridle, J, Rise of the machines: has technology evolved beyond our control?, 15 June, https:// www.theguardian.com/books/2018/jun/15/rise-of-the-machines-has-technology-evolved-beyond -our- control-, 2008.
[12] Burkeman, O, Why can't the worlds greatest minds solve the mystery of consciousness? in Guardian, 21 January. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/jan /21 /-sp-why-cant-worlds-greatest-minds-solve
-mystery-consciousness, 2015.
[13] Chandler, D, Semiotics for Beginners, in The Act of Writing: A Media Theory Approach, University of Wales. Aberystwyth, (pp. 104-6), 1995.
[14] Brier, S, The Paradigm of Peircean Biosemiotic in Signs, Volume 2. (pp. 20-81). 2008.
[15] Freg, S, Static vs. Dynamic Typing of Programming Languages, https://python conquesthe universe. wordpress.com/2009/10/03/static-vs-dynamic-typing-of-programming-languages/.., 2009/2013.
[16] Council, N. R, Input/Output Technologie, in More Than Screen Deep: Toward Every-Citizen Interfaces to the Nation's Information Infrastructure, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, (chap.3). 1997.
[17] RAINIE, J. A. A. L, The Future of Truth and Misinformation Onlin in Internet & Technology in Pew Research Center, https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2017/10/19/the-future-of-truth-and-misinform ation-online/, 2017.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
