THE EFFECT OF SUPERVISOR SUPPORT TO TURNOVER INTENTIONMEDIATING BYCOMPETENCE, PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT AND WORK ENGAGEMENT

Authors

  • Suprihati Studentof Program Doctoral(STIESIA)Surabaya, Indonesia Author
  • Budiyanto SekolahTinggiIlmuEkonomi Indonesia (STIESIA) Surabaya, Indonesia Author
  • Suhermin SekolahTinggiIlmuEkonomi Indonesia (STIESIA) Surabaya, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/th1nnh62

Keywords:

Turnover intention, supervisor support, competence, psychological empowerment,, work engagement

Abstract

Turnover intention is the intention of employees to stop working from work voluntarily or move from one work place to another according to their own choice.This study aims to analyze the direct effect of supervisor support on turnover intention,and the indirect effect between competence, psychological empowerment and work involvement as a mediating variable on turnover intention.The research method is survey method in which primary data collection is obtained directly from textile industry employees and Central Java textile products.Non-random sampling technique with sampling using accidental sampling with research samples of 270 employees of the textile and textile product industries. Data were analyzed using the Structural Equation Modeling method with AMOS.The results of the data analysis show that competence, psychological empowerment and employee involvement have proven to be capable as mediators of turnover intention.This research has implications as material for evaluation and feedback on efforts to handle and improve employees, especially the handling of turnover intention in the textile industry and textile products.

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aguirre , L. R. D,. Roncancio, P. R Aranda, M. M.,& Campos, Á. F. R. (2015). Instrument for Measuring Intentions to Leave, Asia-Pacific Journal Management. Resourses. Innovation. 11(4), 313–322.

Amah. E., &Ahiauzu, A. (2013). Employee involvement and organizational effectiveness, Journal ManagementDivision. 32 (7),661–674,

Berry.M. L., & Morris,M. ( 2008). The Impact of Employee Engagement Factors and Job Satisfaction on Turnover Intention.,” Online Submiss.,

Bester, J. M. W. Stander., &Van Zyl, L. E. (2015) “Leadership empowering behaviour, psychological empowerment, organisational citizenship behaviours and turnover intention in a Manufacturing Division,Journal. Ind. Psychological. 41(1), 102- 115.

Dawley, D. D, Andrews, M. C. , &Bucklew, N. S. (2008). Mentoring, supervisor support, and perceived organizational support: What matters mostLeadersh. OrganizationDivisionJournal. 29 (3), 235–247.

De Cuyper.N., Mauno, S., Kinnunen, U ., &Mäkikangas, A. (2011)The role of job resources in the relation between perceived employability and turnover intention: A prospective two-sample study,JournalVocation Behavior. 78 (2), 253–263.

DeKlerk, S., & Stander, M.W. (2014). Leadership Empowerment Behaviour, Work Engagement and Turnover Intention: the Role of Psychological Empowerment. Journal of Positive Management5(3), 28-39.

Dysvik, A. dan Kuvaas, B.(2013). Perceived job autonomy and turnover intention: The moderating role of perceived supervisor support. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology22(5):, 563–573.

Jones, J. R., & Harter,J.K. (2005). Race Effects on the Employee Engagement-Turnover Intention Relationship.

Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies11(2) ,78–88.

Kalidass, A& Bahron. A. (2015). The Relationship between Perceived Supervisor Support, Perceived Organizational Support, Organizational Commitment and Employee Turnover Intention. International Journal of Business Administration6(5), 82 -89.

Nancarrow. S, Bradbury, J.J. Pit, J.,&Ariss, S. (2014). Intention to stay and intention to leave: Are they two sides of the same coin? A cross-sectional structural equation modelling study among health and social care workers,Journal. Occup. Health,. 56 (4), 292–300.

Pronin. E, Jacobs,E.,&Wegner,D.M. (2008). Psychological Effects of Thought Acceleration,Emotion, 8 (5), 597–612, Rahman,A.,&Ramli,R. (2013). Average concept of crossover operator in real coded genetic algorithm,Int. Proc. Econ.

Dev. Res.63(15), 73–77.

Roslee, A., &Effendi, A.A. (2016). Retaining Quality Employees through Career Development and Perceived Supervisor Support. In 3rd. International Conference On Gender Studies: 391–401.

Shankar. T & Bhatnagar,J. (2010).Work Life Balance, Employee Engagement, Emotional Consonance/dissonance and Turnover Intention,” Indian Journal. Ind. Relat.46(1), 74

Tayebe Abbasi , Gholamreza Taleghani., & Somayye Rajabzade.(2016). Psychological Empowerment and public services innovation; with emphasise employee engagement,JournalPublic Adm.7 (4), 743–764.

Van Schalkwyk S, Du Toit, D. H, Bothma, A. S.,& Rothmann,S. (2010). Job insecurity, leadership empowerment behaviour, employee engagement and intention to leave in a petrochemical laboratory,” SA Journal. Human. Resourses. Managemen. 8 (1), 1–7.

Wong. Y. J. (2015).The Psychology of Encouragement: Theory, Research, and Applications,” Couns. Psychol.43(2), 178–216.

Widjaja. D. C, Fulbertus,M.,&Kusuma D.W. (2012). Analisis Persepsi Employee Empowerment Terhadap Employee Turnover Intention Di Hotel X, Kupang, Nusa Tenggara. Journal. Manajemen. Perhotelan, 4(2) ,.72-84.

Zahra . S, Malik & Khalid, N. (2016). Psychological contract breach, work engagement and turnover inention: Evidence from Banking Industry in Pakistan,Pak. Econ. Soc. Rev., 54(1),37–54.

Downloads

Published

30.09.2020

How to Cite

Suprihati, Budiyanto, & Suhermin. (2020). THE EFFECT OF SUPERVISOR SUPPORT TO TURNOVER INTENTIONMEDIATING BYCOMPETENCE, PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT AND WORK ENGAGEMENT. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(7), 9683-9692. https://doi.org/10.61841/th1nnh62