IDEAL CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS FORMIL EXPERT PROOF AS A BASIS OF JUDGE CONSIDERATION TO DETERMINE COUNTRY FINANCIAL DAMAGES IN CORRUPTION CRIMINAL ACTIONS BASED ON JUSTICE VALUES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/05ab0s49Keywords:
Expert Statement, Competence, CorruptionAbstract
State losses can only be calculated by an expert. The experts here are not only experts in the field of financial audit but also technical experts who will calculate the feasibility of a building construction in the case of a criminal act of corruption which is related to the construction field. The expert who has the competence to calculate the quantity of a building and the price of a building is someone who has a construction management certification. Information from Construction Experts who do not have competence in corruption cases, then their statements become invalid. the purpose of this study is to analyze the weaknesses of expert statements as a basis for judges consideration in corruption, and to construct expert statements as a basis for judges in determining state losses in corruption based on the value of justice. weaknesses in expert evidence as a basis for judges to determine state financial losses in current corruption cases, namely, Weaknesses in Legal Substance, Weaknesses in Legal Structures, Weaknesses in Legal Culture. So that the provisions of Article 1 number 28 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Article 168 of the Criminal Procedure Code need to be reconstructed based on the values of justice.
Downloads
References
Ahmad Ali, 2010, Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) Dan Teori Peradilan (Judicialprudence) ; Termasuk Interpretasi Undang-Undang (Legisprudence) Vol. 1 Pemahaman Awal, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta.
Ahmad Warson Al-Munawwir, 1997, Kamus Al-Munawwir Arab-Indonesia Terlengkap, Pustaka Progressif, Yogyakarta.
Anis Mashdurohatun, Juramadi Esram, Teguh Prasetyo,Legal Protection for Indonesian Migrant Workers Based on National Philosophy Values, TEST, March-April .2020.
Ateng Syafrudin, 2000, Menuju Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Negara yang Bersih dan Bertanggung Jawab, Jurnal Pro Justisa edisi IV, Universitas Parahiayangan, Bandung..
Bambang Poernomo,2005, Hukum Acara Pidana Pokok-pokok Peradilan Pidana Indonesia, Liberty, Yogyakarta. Esmi Warrasih, 2005, Pranata Hukum sebuah telaah Sosiologis, Suryandaru Utama, Semarang.
27 Sudikno Mertokusumo, 2011, Kapita Selekta Ilmu Hukum. Liberty, Yogyakarta. P. 12.
28 Ilham Yuli Isdiyanto,2018, Problematika Teori Hukum, Konstruksi Hukum dan Kesadaran Sosial, jurnal Hukum Bovelty, vol 9 no 1, feb, p.63.
29Anis Mashdurohatun, Juramadi Esram, Teguh Prasetyo,Legal Protection for Indonesian Migrant Workers Based on National Philosophy Values, TEST, March-April .2020.p.2757.
H Salim HS dan Erlies Septiana Nurbani, 20013, Penerapan Teori Hukum pada Penelitian Tesis dan Disertasi, Radja Grafindo Persada.
Ilham Yuli Isdiyanto,2018, Problematika Teori Hukum, Konstruksi Hukum dan Kesadaran Sosial, jurnal Hukum Bovelty, vol 9 no 1, feb.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana
Lawrence M. Friedmann, 2009. Law and Behavioral Science. Indianapolis: The Bobbs Herrin.
Luhut M.P. Pangaribuan, 2013, Hukum Acara Pidana. Surat Resmi Advokat di Pengadilan, Papas Sinar Sinanti, Jakarta.
M. Yahya Harahap,2010, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta. Mahmutarom, 2009, Rekonstruksi Konsep Keadilan, Undip, Semarang.
Mattew B. Miles dan A. Michael Huberman, 1992, Analisis Data Kualitatif , UI Press, Jakarta.
Peraturan Lembaga Pengembangan Jasa Konstruksi Nasional Nomor 4 Tahun 2014 Tentang Penilai Ahli Bidang Jasa Konstruksi
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 29 Tahun 2000 Tentang Penyelenggaraan Jasa Konstruksi,
R. Wirjono Prodjodikoro, 2001, Hukum Acara Pidana di Indonesia, cet. 10, Sumur, Bandung. Raghib al-Isfahani,2005, Mufradaat alfadzil Qur’an, Daar al-Ma’rifah, Beirut.
Ridwan HR, 2008, Hukum Administrasi Negara, Radja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Robert Bogdan and Steven J. Taylor, 1993,Kualitatif: Dasar-dasar Penelitian, Usaha Nasional, Surabaya.
Ronald Dworkin, 1990, Essays in Epistemology Hermeneutics and Jurisprudence dalam Patrick Nerhot, Law Interpretation and Reality, Kluwer Academic Publisher, AA Dordrecht, Netherlands.
Sanafiah Faisal, 1990, Penelitian Kualitatif: Dasar-dasar & Aplikasinya, Yayasan Asah Asih Asuh, Malang. Sherodji Hari, 2010, Pokok-Pokok Kkriminalogi. Aksara baru, Jakarta.
Soerjono Soekanto, 1983, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, UI Press,Jakarta. Sudarto.1996, Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana, Alumni,Bandung.
Sudikno Mertokusumo, 2011, Kapita Selekta Ilmu Hukum. Liberty, Yogyakarta. Sudikno Mertokusumo, 2008, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, liberty, Yogyakarta. Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 Tentang Jasa Konstruksi
Zainuddin Ali,2014 Metode Penelitian Hukum , Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
