Diagnostic Test of Frailty Syndrome Based on Scoring Systems of Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS), Study of Osteoporotic Fracture (SOF), and Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) to Frailty Index Based on Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (FI- CGA)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/wbjy9n06Keywords:
frailty, elderly, CHS, TFI, FI-CGAAbstract
The Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS), Study of Osteoporotic Fracture (SOF), and Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) scoring systems are known to be more applicable than Frailty Index Based on Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (FI-CGA) in community health services but their diagnostic capabilities have not been known. The objective of this study was to find out the diagnostic test of frailty syndrome based on CHS, SOF, and TFI to FI-CGA scoring system in Surabaya elderly community. This study was a cross-sectional analytic study with diagnostic test approach that is calculating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and ROC curve of CHS, SOF, and TFI to FI- CGA scoring system as reference standard. A total of 170 females and males aged >60 years who were enrolled in elderly health center in this study. To classify frail and non-frail conditions, CHS had 78.57% sensitivity, 71.8% specificity, and AUC value of 0.802 (CI=95%, p<0.001), SOF had 23.8% sensitivity, 87.5% specificity, and AUC value of 0.739 (CI=95%, p<0.001), TFI had 71.43% sensitivity, 78.13% specificity, and AUC value of 0.859 (CI=95%, p<0.001). CHS and TFI have a good diagnostic capability to diagnose frailty syndrome in health center for elderly in Surabaya.
Downloads
References
[1] R. Amelia, J. Harahap, A. S. Wahyuni, and A. Pratama, “Health status of elderly based on daily activities living, cholesterol and uric acid profile in Medan city,” 2018, vol. 125, no. 1, doi: 10.1088/1755- 1315/125/1/012175.
[2] M. Miftahussurur and Y. Yamaoka, “Helicobacter pylori virulence genes and host genetic polymorphisms as risk factors for peptic ulcer disease,” Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol., vol. 9, no. 12, p. 1535, 2015.
[3] J. Bauer and C. Sieber, “Sarcopenia and frailty: A clinician’s controversial point of view,” Exp. Gerontol., vol. 43, pp. 674–678, Aug. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2008.03.007.
[4] P.-O. Lang, J.-P. Michel, and D. Zekry, “Frailty syndrome: a transitional state in a dynamic process.,”
Gerontology, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 539–549, 2009, doi: 10.1159/000211949.
[5] M. Roppolo, A. Mulasso, R. J. Gobbens, C. O. Mosso, and E. Rabaglietti, “A comparison between uni- and multidimensional frailty measures: prevalence, functional status, and relationships with disability.,” Clin. Interv. Aging, vol. 10, pp. 1669–1678, 2015, doi: 10.2147/CIA.S92328.
[6] Raodah, Masni, and R. M. Thaha, “Relationship between hormonal contraception use with age of menopause among elderly at Posyandu Sidodadi village Wonomulyo subdistrict Polewali Mandar district,” 2018, pp. 68–72, doi: 10.1145/3242789.3242801.
[7] B. Thalib, B. Horas, E. Machmud, Asmawati, and R. Hasyim, “Alteration of memory and depression in elderly with full overdenture - Pilot study,” J. Int. Dent. Med. Res., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 62–65, 2018.
[8] G. A. Aguayo et al., “Agreement Between 35 Published Frailty Scores in the General Population,”
Am. J. Epidemiol., vol. 186, no. 4, pp. 420–434, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx061.
[9] B. J. Buta et al., “Frailty assessment instruments: Systematic characterization of the uses and contexts of highly-cited instruments.,” Ageing Res. Rev., vol. 26, pp. 53–61, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2015.12.003.
[10] J. Apóstolo et al., “Predicting risk and outcomes for frail older adults: an umbrella review of frailty screening tools,” JBI Database Syst. Rev. Implement. Reports, vol. 15, pp. 1154–1208, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003018.
[11] V. G. Moreira and R. A. Lourenço, “Prevalence and factors associated with frailty in an older population from the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: the FIBRA-RJ Study,” Clinics (Sao Paulo)., vol. 68, no. 7,
pp. 979–985, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.6061/clinics/2013(07)15.
[12] A. B. Mitnitski, A. J. Mogilner, and K. Rockwood, “Accumulation of deficits as a proxy measure of aging,” ScientificWorldJournal., vol. 1, pp. 323–336, Aug. 2001, doi: 10.1100/tsw.2001.58.
[13] G. A. Van Kan, Y. Rolland, H. Bergman, J. E. Morley, S. B. Kritchevsky, and B. Vellas, “The
I.A.N.A Task Force on frailty assessment of older people in clinical practice.,” J. Nutr. Health Aging, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 29–37, Jan. 2008, doi: 10.1007/bf02982161.
[14] E. Dent, P. Kowal, and E. O. Hoogendijk, “Frailty measurement in research and clinical practice: A review,” Eur. J. Intern. Med., vol. 31, pp. 3–10, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2016.03.007.
[15] K. Rockwood and A. Mitnitski, “Frailty defined by deficit accumulation and geriatric medicine defined by frailty.,” Clin. Geriatr. Med., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 17–26, Feb. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2010.08.008.
[16] D. M. Jones, X. Song, and K. Rockwood, “Operationalizing a frailty index from a standardized comprehensive geriatric assessment.,” J. Am. Geriatr. Soc., vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 1929–1933, Nov. 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52521.x.
[17] O. Theou, T. D. Brothers, A. Mitnitski, and K. Rockwood, “Operationalization of frailty using eight commonly used scales and comparison of their ability to predict all-cause mortality.,” J. Am. Geriatr. Soc., vol. 61, no. 9, pp. 1537–1551, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.1111/jgs.12420.
[18] S. F. Metzelthin, R. Daniëls, E. van Rossum, L. de Witte, W. J. A. van den Heuvel, and G. I. J. M. Kempen, “The psychometric properties of three self-report screening instruments for identifying frail older people in the community.,” BMC Public Health, vol. 10, p. 176, Mar. 2010, doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-176.
[19] T. Pialoux, J. Goyard, and B. Lesourd, “Screening tools for frailty in primary health care: a systematic review,” Geriatr. Gerontol. Int., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 189–197, 2012.
[20] Kushariyadi, “Memory Stimulation, Intervention Increase Elderly Cognitive Function,” J. Ners, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 317–329, 2013, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/jn.v8i2.3836.
[21] F. I. Fitri and A. S. Rambe, “Correlation between hypertension and cognitive function in elderly,” 2018, vol. 125, no. 1, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/125/1/012177.
[22] M. Sulam, “Correlation Between Nutritional Status And Waist Circumference With The Incidence Of Hypertension In The Elderly,” J. Berk. Epidemiol., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 81–88, 2020, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/jbe.V8I12020.81-88.
[23] E. Seto, S. Setiati, P. W. Laksmi, and T. Z. Tamin, “Diagnostic test of a scoring system for frailty syndrome in the elderly according to cardiovascular health study, study of osteoporotic fracture and comprehensive geriatric assessment based frailty index compared with frailty index 40 items,” Acta Med. Indones., vol. 47, no. 3, 2015.
[24] B. Siregar, U. Andayani, R. P. Bahri, Seniman, and F. Fahmi, “Real-time monitoring system for elderly people in detecting falling movement using accelerometer and gyroscope,” 2018, vol. 978, no. 1, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/978/1/012110.
[25] K. E. Ensrud et al., “Comparison of 2 Frailty Indexes for Prediction of Falls, Disability, Fractures, and Death in Older Women,” Arch. Intern. Med., vol. 168, no. 4, pp. 382–389, Feb. 2008, doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2007.113.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
