ASSOCIATION OF GENDER AND BONE DENSITY - A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/nf8cg883Keywords:
age, association, bone density, gender, implant survivalAbstract
BACKGROUND: Long-term survival of the implant is expected for the evaluation of success rate. In spite of the high success and survival rates, failures do arise, and the certain factors are responsible for this. They include health age, gender, status habits, quality of bone, oral hygiene maintenance etc. Since, all the above can be involved, bone density influences the survival of implants to a greater extent.
AIM: The aim of this study is to assess the association between gender and bone density in implant received patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who had reported to saveetha dental college during June 2019- March 2020. Case records of 86, 000 patients were reviewed, and 400 subjects were recruited for the study based on the inclusion criteria such as age, gender, bone density and implant treatment received. Data was entered in excel sheet and later exported to SPSS software for statistical analysis. Both descriptive (percentage)and inferential statistics (Chi square test) were done.
RESULTS: D2 was the most common type of bone density noticed among implant patients (64.8%). No statistical significance for association of bone density and site of implant placement. (p>0.05). Statistical significances were observed between bone density and gender(p<0.05).
CONCLUSION: Thus, to conclude bone density was higher for the younger age group. There was an association between gender and bone density.
Downloads
References
1. Brånemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindström J, Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969;3(2):81–100.
2. Brånemark PI, Adell R, Albrektsson T, Lekholm U, Lundkvist S, Rockler B. Osseointegrated titanium fixtures in the treatment of edentulousness. Biomaterials. 1983 Jan;4(1):25–8.
3. Jayesh RS, Dhinakarsamy V. Osseointegration. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015 Apr;7(Suppl 1):S226–9.
4. Emami E, Heydecke G, Rompré PH, de Grandmont P, Feine JS. Impact of implant support for mandibular dentures on satisfaction, oral and general health-related quality of life: a meta-analysis of randomizedcontrolled trials. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Jun;20(6):533–44.
5. Eckert SE, Wollan PC. Retrospective review of 1170 endosseous implants placed in partially edentulous jaws. J Prosthet Dent. 1998 Apr;79(4):415–21.
6. Lekholm U, Gunne J, Henry P, Higuchi K, Lindén U, Bergström C, et al. Survival of the Brånemark implant in partially edentulous jaws: a 10-year prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999 Sep;14(5):639–45.
7. Giro G, Chambrone L, Goldstein A, Rodrigues JA, Zenóbio E, Feres M, et al. Impact of osteoporosis in dental implants: A systematic review. World J Orthop.2015 Mar 18;6(2):311–5.
8. Dudley J. Implants for the ageing population. Aust Dent J. 2015 Mar;60 Suppl 1:28–43.
9. Jyothi S, Robin PK, Ganapathy D, Anandiselvaraj. Periodontal Health Status of Three Different Groups Wearing Temporary Partial Denture. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2017 Dec 30;10(12):4339–42.
10. Ganapathy D, Sathyamoorthy A, Ranganathan H, Murthykumar K. Effect of Resin Bonded Luting Agents Influencing Marginal Discrepancy in All Ceramic Complete Veneer Crowns. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Dec;10(12):ZC67–70.
11. Ranganathan H, Ganapathy DM, Jain AR. Cervical and Incisal Marginal Discrepancy in Ceramic Laminate Veneering Materials: A SEM Analysis. Contemp Clin Dent. 2017 Apr;8(2):272–8.
12. Venugopalan S, Ariga P, Aggarwal P, Viswanath A. Magnetically retained silicone facial prosthesis. Niger J Clin Pract. 2014 Mar;17(2):260–4.
13. Ashok V, Nallaswamy D, Benazir Begum S, Nesappan T. Lip Bumper Prosthesis for an Acromegaly Patient: A Clinical Report. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2014 Dec;14(Suppl 1):279–82.
14. Kannan A, Venugopalan S. A Systematic Review on the Effect of Use of Impregnated Retraction Cords on Gingiva. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2018 May 30;11(5):2121–6.
15. Subasree S, Murthykumar K, Dhanraj. Effect of Aloe Vera in Oral Health-A Review. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2016;9(5):609.
16. Vijayalakshmi B, Ganapathy D. Medical management of cellulitis. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2016;9(11):2067–70.
17. Jain AR, Nallaswamy D, Ariga P, Ganapathy DM. Determination of correlation of width of maxillary anterior teeth using extraoral and intraoral factors in Indian population: A systematic review. World Journal of Dentistry. 2018 Jan 1;9(1):68–75.
18. Selvan SR, Ganapathy D. Efficacy of Fifth Generation Cephalosporins against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus- A Review. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2016 Oct 28;9(10):1815–8.
19. Ashok V, Suvitha S. Awareness of all Ceramic Restoration in Rural Population. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2016 Oct 28;9(10):1691–3.
20. Basha FYS, Ganapathy D, Venugopalan S. Oral Hygiene Status among Pregnant Women. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2018 Jul 31;11(7):3099–102.
21. Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Dental implants inserted in male versus female patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Rehabil. 2015 Sep;42(9):709–22.
22. Haas R, Mensdorff-Pouilly N, Mailath G, Watzek G. Survival of 1,920 IMZ implants followed for up to 100 months. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996 Sep;11(5):581–8.
23. Drage NA, Palmer RM, Blake G, Wilson R, Crane F, Fogelman I. A comparison of bone mineral density in the spine, hip and jaws of edentulous subjects. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Aug;18(4):496–500.
24. Turkyilmaz I, Tözüm TF, Tumer C. Bone density assessments of oral implant sites using computerized tomography. J Oral Rehabil. 2007 Apr;34(4):267–72.
25. Salimov F, Tatli U, Kürkçü M, Akoğlan M, Oztunç H, Kurtoğlu C. Evaluation of relationship between preoperative bone density values derived from cone beam computed tomography and implant stability parameters: a clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Sep;25(9):1016–21.
26. Turkyilmaz I, McGlumphy EA. Influence of bone density on implant stability parameters and implant success: a retrospective clinical study. BMC Oral Health. 2008 Nov 24;8:32.
27. Venkatakrishnan CJ, Bhuminathan S, Chandran CR, Poovannan S. Dental Implants in Patients With Osteoporosis – A Review. Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal. 2017 Sep 25;10(3):1415–8.
28. Famili P, Zavoral JM. Low Skeletal Bone Mineral Density Does Not Affect Dental Implants. J Oral Implantol. 2015 Oct;41(5):550–3.
29. Mohajerani H, Roozbayani R, Taherian S, Tabrizi R. The Risk Factors in Early Failure of Dental Implants: a Retrospective Study. J Dent. 2017 Dec;18(4):298–303.
30. Kannan A, Others. Effect of Coated Surfaces influencing Screw Loosening in Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. WORLD. 2017;8(6):496–502.
31. Duraisamy R, Krishnan CS, Ramasubramanian H, Sampathkumar J, Mariappan S, Navarasampatti Sivaprakasam A. Compatibility of Nonoriginal Abutments With Implants: Evaluation of Microgap at the Implant-Abutment Interface, With Original and Nonoriginal Abutments. Implant Dent. 2019 Jun;28(3):289–95.
32. Farhat Yaasmeen Sadique Basha, Rajeshkumar S, Lakshmi T, Anti-inflammatory activity of Myristica fragrans extract . Int. J. Res. Pharm. Sci., 2019 ;10(4), 3118-3120 DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26452/ijrps.v10i4.1607
33. Ajay R, Suma K, Ali SA, Kumar Sivakumar JS, Rakshagan V, Devaki V, et al. Effect of Surface
Modifications on the Retention of Cement-retained Implant Crowns under Fatigue Loads: An In vitron Study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2017 Nov;9(Suppl 1):S154–60.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
