New Trends of Updated Educational System in the Republic of Kazakhstan

Authors

  • Orazakynkyzy Farida KAZNU named after al Farabi, Almaty, Kazakhstan Author
  • Kochshanova Gulash Caspian State university of technology and engineering, 010000, Aktau, Republic of Kazakhstan Author
  • Dalelkyzy Karakat KAZNU named after al Farabi, Almaty, Kazakhstan Author
  • Saparbayeva Nurzhan KAZNU named after al Farabi, Almaty, Kazakhstan Author
  • Ozgambayeva Raikhan Kazakh National Women’s Teacher Trainning university, 050010, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan Author
  • Aimbetova Ulbosyn Academy of Art, Nur-Sultan city, Kazakhstan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/njxkty70

Keywords:

Updated system, quality, quality in Education, trends

Abstract

The conducted research has revealed that although monitoring techniques have been used in the education system widely and for a long time, insufficient account has been taken of opportunities emerging from their direct impact on the effectiveness of education quality. In using monitoring as a tool for assessing higher education quality, various problems arise. Monitoring, in this case, is not a universal tool; but if it is adequate to the existing conditions and its results are correctly used, it can essentially improve the quality of the education process and of its outcomes. The article presents the analysis of the components of monitoring as one of management tools for the higher education (HE) system at macro- and micro- levels. The aim of the article is to identify problems of its organization and implementation in the system of professional education on the whole and in higher educational institutions in particular, as well as to analyze the application prospects of monitoring.

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Juram J, Gryna F. Quality planning and analysis from product development through use, NY, McGraw-Hill 1993.

[2] Galetto F. Qualitade i metoda. La verita Liberi, XIX Congres Nazionale, A1GO, Assage 1997.

[3] Peter Van N. Object-orienteted Quality and Risc Management (OQRM). A punctual and generic method to manage quality and risk. Microdata ISBN 979-1-291-037 35-7, 2012.

[4] Popescu S, Bratianu C, Atanasiu G, Rusu C, Oprcan C, Curaj A, Buzarncscu S. Ghidul calitatii in invatamantul superior, Proiectul Calistro, Ed. Universitatii, Bucuresti 2004.

[5] Riley J. Managing Quality, GCSE&IGCSE, Business studies 2012.

[6] Rusu C. Bazele Managementului calitatii totale, Ed.Dacia, ISBN:973-35-1578-7, Cluj-Napoca 2002.

[7] Rusu C. The University Regarded as a Cybernetic System, Proceedings of the 3rd International Seminar on the Quality Management in Higher Education, Iasi, Romania, June 14-15, 2004.

[8] Cuc S, Bungau C. Creating competitive advantage throught sustainable value chain - insights on automotive and textile industry, Proceedigs The Management Betwin Profit and Social Resoponsability, 18-20 sep. 2014.

[9] Cluj–Napoca p.186-179,ISSN2247-8639.

[10] Ashby W. General Systems Theory as a New Discipline. Facets Of Systems Science 1991; 249-257. Athiyaman A. 1997.

[11] Avanesov VC. Linking student satisfaction and service quality perceptions: the case of university education. European Journal Of Marketing 31(7): 528-540.

Downloads

Published

30.09.2020

How to Cite

Farida, O., Gulash, K., Karakat, D., Nurzhan, S., Raikhan, O., & Ulbosyn, A. (2020). New Trends of Updated Educational System in the Republic of Kazakhstan. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(9), 5703-5709. https://doi.org/10.61841/njxkty70