“Systems, Applications, Products” in information preparing, or SAP, was initially presented during the 1980s as “Systems, Applications, Products” R/2, which was a system that furnished clients with a delicate continuous business application that could be utilized in numerous monetary forms and dialects. As customer server systems started to be presented, “Systems, Applications, Products” drew out a server based rendition of their product called SAP R/3, from now on alluded to as SAP, which was propelled in 1992. SAP likewise built up a graphical UI, or GUI. For 12 years SAP commanded the huge business applications showcase. It was fruitful essentially in light of the fact that it was adaptable. Since SAP was a particular system (implying that the different capacities given by it could be acquired piecemeal) it was an adaptable system. An organization could essentially buy modules that they needed and redo the procedures to coordinate the organization's plan of action. SAP's adaptability, while one of its most noteworthy qualities is likewise perhaps the best shortcoming that prompts the SAP review. There are three principles “enterprise resource planning” (ERP) systems utilized in the present bigger organizations: SAP, Oracle, and PeopleSoft. ERP's are explicitly intended to help with the accounting capacity and, the power over different parts of the organization's business, for example, deals, conveyance, creation, human assets, and stock administration. In spite of the advantages of ERP's, there are numerous potential traps that organizations who go to ERP's once in a while fall into.