Factor Afecting Good Governance on Performance Management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/ygmqnq12Keywords:
-Good Governance, OCB, mediation influence, religious ideology, MakassarAbstract
The purpose of this research is to know the mediation influence of good university governance against the influence of organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) on the performance of religious-ideology-based university. The design of this research was an explanatory design. The research approach used was survey method, by giving questionnaires to respondents. The population in this research was religious-ideology-based private university in Makassar, while the research sample is the existing study program in each faculty, because study program is the heart of university which is the meeting place between stakeholders. Based on the results of this research, it can concluded that there is the significant direct influence between Organizational Citizenship Behavior against good university governnace and performance. The higher the Organizational Citizenship Behavior, the higher the good university governance and performance will be. The originality of this research is to test the mediation influenceof good university governance in collaboration with organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) variable and performance done at religious-ideology-based university in Indonesia which has different characteristics with universities in other regions.
Downloads
References
[1] Aldag & Resckhe, 1997. Employee Value Added: Measuring Discretionary Effect and Its Value to the Organization. http;//doctoc.com.
[2] Al-Musadieq, M., Nurjannah, Raharjo, K., Solimun, & Fernandes, A.A.R. (2018), “The mediating effect of work motivation on the influence of job design and organizational culture against HR performance”, Journal of Management Development, Vol 37 No 6, pp 452-469
[3] Blau, P. (1964). Power and exchange in social life. NY: John Wiley & Sons.
[4] Boyatzis, R. E., & Ron, S. (2001). Unleashing the power of self directed learning, case western reserve university. USA: Cleveland, Ohio.
[5] Bungin (2003) Metodologi penelitian kualitatif: Aktualisasi metodologis ke arah ragam varian kontenporer. PT Raja Grafindo Persada Jakarta.
[6] Creswell,John W. 2009. Research Design, and Mixed Method Aproach. Third Edition, Sage Publications.
[7] Deegan, C. and Rankin, M. 1996. “Do Australian companies report environmental news objectively? An analysis of environmental disclosures by firms prosecuted successfully by the Environmental Protection Authority”, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 52-69..
[8] Donalson,.T & Preston, L.E. 1995. The Stakeholder Theory of The Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications. Academy of Management Review. Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 262-303
[9] Fernandes, A.A.R. (2018), “The effect of organization culture and technology on motivation, knowledge asset and knowledge management”, International Journal of Law and Management, Vol 60 No 5, pp 1087-1096.
[10] Francis. 1990. ‘After Virtue’? Accounting As a Moral and Discursiva Practice, Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal, Vol. 3 No.3.
[11] Freeman, R. E. 1991. Business Ethics: The State of the Art, New York: Oxford University Press.
[12] Freeman, R.E. 1990. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.
[13] Frensidy. 2007. Persaingan Perguruan Tinggi Indonesia: A Looser’s Game. Manajemen Usahawan Indonesia No 08/TH/XXXVI/2007
[14] Gull, G. A., & Doh, J. (2004). The “transmutation” of the organization: Toward a more spiritual workplace. Journal of management inquiry, 13(2), 128-139.
[15] Hakim, W., Fernandes, A.A.R. (2017), “Moderation effect of organizational citizenship behavior on the performance of lecturers”, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol 30 No 7, pp 1136-1148.
[16] Hatch, M. J., & Schultz, M. 2001. The dynamics of organizational identity. Human Relations, 55 (8): 989-1018.
[17] Hatch, Mary Jo., and Majken J. Schultz. 2000. “Scaling the tower of Babel: relational differences between identity, image and culture in organizations.” In Majken, J. Schultz., Mary Jo Hatch., and Mogens H. Larsen. (eds.), The expressive organization, 11-35. New York: Oxford University Press.
[18] Herman Dedi, Sumartono, Zauhar. 2011. Akuntabilitas Eksistensi Organisasi Non Profit dalam Perspektif Governance (Studi Terhadap Yayasan Lembaga Pembinaan Masyarakat Desa Lampung) Jurnal Borneo Administratur Vol. 7 No.1 Tahun 2011.
[19] Hill, C. W. L. and T.M. Jones. 1992. Stakeholder-Agency Theory. Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 29 No.2, Pp. 131-154.
[20] Hutahayan, B. (2019), Performance art strategy for tourism segmentation: (A silat movement of Minangkabau ethnic group) in the event of tourism performance improvement, Journal of Islamic Marketing, Forthcming Issue
[21] Hofstede, G. 1998a. Attitude, Values And Organizational Culture: Disentangling The Concepts, Organization Studies, Vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 477-492.
[22] Hofstede, G. 1998b. Identifying Organizational Subcultures: An Empirical Approach, Journal Of Management Studies. January; Vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 1-12
[23] Indarti, S.,Solimun,Fernandes, A.A.R.,Hakim, W. (2017). “The effect of OCB in relationship between personality, organizational commitment and job satisfaction on performance”, Journal of Management Development, Vol 36 No 10, pp 1283-1293.
[24] Junaid 2015, The Mediating Effect of Performance on The Influence of Symbol Interpretation and Strength Of Identity on The Accountability Of Ideologi Based Private Universities in Indonesian. International Journal Of Applied Business and Economic Research.Vol.3 2015.
[25] Kreitner R. dan Kinicki A. 2003. Organizational Behavior. Alih Bahasa Erly Suandy. PT. Salemba Empat. Jakarta.
[26] Lawton dan Rose. 2004. Memahami Good Government Governance dan Good Coorporate Governance,
Yogyakarta : Penerbit YPAPI
[27] Leslie (2004) Pentingnya Good University Governance. Ditjen DIKTI KEMDIKBUD
[28] Limba, R.S., Hutahayan, B., Solimun, & Fernandes, A.A.R. (2019), “Sustaining innovation and change in government sector organizations: Examining the nature and significance of politics of organizational learning”, Journal of Strategy and Management, Vol 12 No 1, pp 103-115.
[29] Mardiasmo. 2004. Otonomi dan Manajemen Keuangan Daerah. Penerbit Andy. Yogyakarta.
[30] Markoczy, L., & Xin, K. (2002). The virtues of omission in Organizational Citizenship Behavior., version 1.14.
[31] Michell, R. K., B. R. Agle, and D. J. Wood. 1997. Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Silence; Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. Academy of Management Review. Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 853-886.
[32] Morgan G. 1988. Accounting as Reality Construction: Towards a New Epistemology for Accounting Practice’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vo.13, No.5.
[33] Oguz, 2010. The Relatinship Between The Leadership Style of The School Administrators and the Organizational Citizenship Behaviors of Teachersl Procedia Social and Behavioral Science. 9:1188-1193
[34] Organ 1990. Organizational Citizenship behavior the good soldier syndrome. Lexington MA. Lexington book.
[35] Podsakoff, PM., Mackenzie, SB., Paine, J B & Bachrac D G. 1998. Some positible antecedents of in role and extra role salesperson Performance. Journal of Marketing 62L87-98
[36] Pradiansyah Arvan. 2007. Spiritualitas Dalam Bisnis: Lahirnya Generasi Ketiga. SWAsembada. No. 5/XXIII/Maret.
[37] Ritzer,George dan Douglas J Godman. 2012. Teori Sosiologi Modern. Ed.ke-6 (terjemahan Alimandan) Prenada Media Group. Kencana Jakarta.
[38] Robbins, S.P. 1996. Organizational Behavior: Concept, Controversies And Applications, 7th Edition, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Inc.
[39] Rosemarie Sudjiati. 2010. Studi Akuntabilitas pada Perguruan Tinggi Swasta: Satu Kajian Ilmu Administrasi Pendidikan. Disertasi Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Bandung.
[40] Salleh & Aslam. 1995. Accountability. The Endless Prophecy. The Asian and Pacific Development Centre, Malaysia.
[41] Scott, S. G., and Lane, V. R. 2000. A stakeholder approach to organizational identity. Academy of Management Review, 25 (1): 43-62.
[42] Subagio, H. (2011). Pengaruh atribut supermarket terhadap motif belanja hedonik motif belanja utilitarian dan loyalitas konsumen. Jurnal Manajemen Pemasaran, 6(1), 8-21.
[43] Suchman.M.C. 1995. Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approach. Academy of Management Journal 20,N0.3.
[44] Undang-Undang No. 20 tahun 2003 tentang Pendidikan Tinggi Nasional.
[45] UNDP. 1997. Governance For Sustainable Development-A.Policy Document UNDP, New York.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
