Mediating Impact of Psychological Autonomy on the relationship between Entrepreneurship Engagement and Wellbeing

Authors

  • Asriyal Institut Teknologi Dan Bisnis Ahmad Dahlan Jakarta Author
  • Amrizal Institut Teknologi Dan Bisnis Ahmad Dahlan Jakarta Author
  • Koesmawan Institut Teknologi Dan Bisnis Ahmad Dahlan Jakarta Author
  • Henny Mulyati Institut Teknologi Dan Bisnis Ahmad Dahlan Jakarta Author
  • Husnayeti Institut Teknologi Dan Bisnis Ahmad Dahlan Jakarta Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/pdec3557

Keywords:

psychological autonomy, wellbeing, entrepreneurship engagement, structural equational modeling.

Abstract

Present study aims to investigate the mediating role of psychological autonomy (PSA) on the relationship between entrepreneurship engagement (EENG) and well-being (WB). For this purpose, data are collected through an online questionnaire survey from 267 entrepreneurs and business owners of different industries. The study analyzed the data by using smart PLS’s SEM. Smart PLS used variances-based approach of partial least square that explains measurement errors and therefore accounts for providing more precise results as compare to OLS regressions. The results show significant and positive relationship between EENG and WB. PSA mediates the linkage between EENG and WB. The study suggested that EENG should be promoted as it helps individuals in establishing their own goals, increases the level of competency and enhances WB.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Benz, M., & Frey, B. S. (2003). The value of autonomy: Evidence from the self-employed in 23 countries. Institute for Empirical Research in Economics Working Paper, (173).

[2] Binder, M., & Coad, A. (2016). How satisfied are the self-employed? A life domain view. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(4), 1409-1433.

[3] Cordeiro, P., Paixão, P., Lens, W., Lacante, M., & Sheldon, K. (2016). Factor structure and dimensionality of the balanced measure of psychological needs among Portuguese high school students. Relations to well-being and ill- being. Learning and Individual Differences, 47, 51-60.

[4] Dahalan, N., Jaafar, M., & Rosdi, S. A. M. (2013). Local community readiness in entrepreneurship: do gender differ in searching business opportunity. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 91, 403-410.

[5] Diener, E., Inglehart, R., & Tay, L. (2013). Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Social Indicators Research, 112(3), 497-527.

[6] Dijkhuizen, J., Veldhoven, M. V., & Schalk, R. (2016). Four types of well-being among entrepreneurs and their relationships with business performance. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 25(2), 184-210.

[7] Foo, M. D. (2011). Emotions and entrepreneurial opportunity evaluation. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 35(2), 375-393.

[8] Fotiadis, A., Abdulrahman, K., & Spyridou, A. (2019). The Mediating Roles of Psychological Autonomy, Competence and Relatedness on Work-Life Balance and Well-Being. Frontiers in psychology, 10.

[9] Frederick, A. (2016). Entrepreneurial engagement and quality of life: toward a conceptual framework. Australian Journal of Business and Economic Studies, 2(1).

[10] Frey, B. S., Benz, M., & Stutzer, A. (2004). Introducing procedural utility: Not only what, but also how matters. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics JITE, 160(3), 377-401.

[11] Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equations modeling (PLS-SEM). Beverly Hills: SAGE Publishers

[12] Hanglberger, D., & Merz, J. (2015). Does self-employment really raise job satisfaction? Adaptation and anticipation effects on self-employment and general job changes. Journal for Labour Market Research, 48(4), 287.

[13] Haynie, J. M., & Shepherd, D. (2011). Toward a theory of discontinuous career transition: Investigating career transitions necessitated by traumatic life events. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 501.

[14] Hessels, J., Rietveld, C. A., & van der Zwan, P. (2017). Self-employment and work-related stress: The mediating role of job control and job demand. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(2), 178-196.

[15] Keller, H. (2015). Psychological autonomy and hierarchical relatedness as organizers of developmental pathways.

Philos. Trans. B 371, 1–9. doi: 10.1098/ rstb.2015.0070

[16] Lange, T. (2012). Job satisfaction and self-employment: autonomy or personality? Small business economics, 38(2), 165-177.

[17] Rahmani, K., Gnoth, J., & Mather, D. (2018). Hedonic and eudaimonic well-being: A psycholinguistic view. Tourism Management, 69, 155-166.

[18] Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications.

[19] Ryff, C. D. (2019). Entrepreneurship and eudaimonic well-being: Five venues for new science. Journal of business venturing, 34(4), 646-663.

[20] Shane, S., Locke, E. A., & Collins, C. J. (2003). Entrepreneurial motivation. Human resource management review, 13(2), 257-279.

[21] Shir, N., Nikolaev, B. N., & Wincent, J. (2019). Entrepreneurship and well-being: The role of psychological autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(5), 105875.

[22] Simmons, S. A., Wiklund, J., Levie, J., Bradley, S. W., & Sunny, S. A. (2019). Gender gaps and reentry into entrepreneurial ecosystems after business failure. Small Business Economics, 53(2), 517-531

[23] van der Zwan, P., Thurik, R., Verheul, I., & Hessels, J. (2016). Factors influencing the entrepreneurial engagement of opportunity and necessity entrepreneurs. Eurasian Business Review, 6(3), 273-295.

[24] Van Gelderen, M., Kautonen, T., & Fink, M. (2015). From entrepreneurial intentions to actions: Self-control and action-related doubt, fear, and aversion. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(5), 655-673.

[25] Vinzi, V. E., Chin, W. W., Henseler, J., & Wang, H. (2010). Handbook of partial least squares (Vol. 201, No. 0). Berlin: Springer.

[26] Voorhees, C.M., M.K. Brady, R. Calantone and E. Ramirez, 2016. Discriminant validity testing in marketing: An analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1): 119-134.

Downloads

Published

30.09.2020

How to Cite

Asriyal, Amrizal, Koesmawan, Mulyati, H., & Husnayeti. (2020). Mediating Impact of Psychological Autonomy on the relationship between Entrepreneurship Engagement and Wellbeing. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(7), 991-1001. https://doi.org/10.61841/pdec3557