Knowledge Sharing Process on Sustainable Public Service Program Innovation: a case study in Surakarta City
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/j35e3q28Keywords:
knowledge management, knowledge sharing, innovation cycle, public serviceAbstract
Knowledge Sharing (KS) is an essential component in Knowledge Management (KM), which is the primary driver in creating sustainable innovation. Five-yearly leadership succession is always followed by massive mutations so that both phenomena have become threats to the sustainability of public service innovations. This qualitative research will explore on: How does the process of innovation program knowledge sharing occur concerning the sustainability of public service program innovations after the succession of regional heads in the Surakarta City Government? The findings have shown that there has been knowledge sharing program innovation that occurred after succession and massive mutation, which are influenced by four variables: the role of the leaders, transformation of innovative mindset, mechanism of social interaction, and external drive. In connection with these findings, further research is recommended to deepen the study of the constructed model of the proposition on local government organizations that fail to continue their program innovations post-succession. Another quantitative research construct model is to test the level of influence of the four KS variables innovation programs in both profit and non-profit organizations.
Downloads
References
[1] Barney, J 1991 Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage Journal of Management 77, 1 99-120
[2] Theriou, NG, Aggelidis, V, dan Theriou, GN,2009 A Theoretical Framework Contrasting the Resource-Based Perspective and the Knowledge-Based View European Research Studies 73
[3] McAdam, R, & Reid, R 2000 A comparison of public and private sector perceptions and use of knowledge management Journal of European Industrial Training 246 317-29
[4] Wu, W Y, & Sukoco, B M 2010 Why should I share? Examining consumers' motives and trust on knowledge sharing Journal of Computer Information Systems 504 11-9
[5] Yeşil, S, Koska, A, & Büyükbeşe, T 2013 Knowledge sharing process, innovation capability and innovation performance: An empirical study Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 75 217-25
[6] Lee, M C 2016 Knowledge Management and innovation management: best practices in Knowledge Sharing and knowledge value chain International Journal of Innovation and Learning 192 206-26
[7] Turcan, R V 2011 De-internationalization: A conceptualization International Business Economics (Working Paper, Aalborg University)
[8] Putra, W M 2015 Analisis Implementasi Kebijakan Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional di Rumah Sakit Umum Kota Tangerang Selatan Tahun 2014
[9] Pratama, H W 2016 Difusi Inovasi dan Adopsi Program Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional Studi Difusi Inovasi dan Adopsi Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional sebagai Program BPJS Kesehatan di Desa Catur Kabupaten Boyolali
[10] Marbun, S, Posumah, J H, & Rompas, S, 2015 Kinerja Pegawai dalam Meningkatkan Pelayanan Administrasi Kependudukan di Dinas Kependudukan dan Catatan Sipil Kota Manado Jurnal Administrasi Publik 229
[11] Octaviani, R 2016 Analisis Efektivitas Pelaksanaan E-Ktp Dalam Mendukung Terciptanya Good GovERNMENT Jurnal Ilmu dan Riset Akuntansi 22
[12] Wang, G A, Wang, H J, Li, J, & Fan, W 2014 Mining knowledge sharing processes in online discussion forums In System Sciences HICSS, 2014 (47th Hawaii International Conference) 3898-907
[13] Rothwell, W J, Jackson, R D, Ressler, C L, Jones, M C, & Brower, M 2015 Career Planning and Succession Management: Developing Your Organization's Talent—for Today and Tomorrow Praeger (Oxford: Harcourt Education [distributor], Westport, Conn)
[14] Durst, S, Yip, J, & Lee, R W 2015 SME Succession Planning and Knowledge Loss
Assessment Knowledge Management for Competitive Advantage During Economic Crisis 282-98
[15] Gunawan, S, & Shieh, C J 2016 A study on the effects of knowledge share in virtual community on creative teaching behaviors and teacher efficacy Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education 124 1101-13
[16] Gothard, Z & Austin, MJ, 2013 Leadership Succession Planning: Implications for Nonprofit Human Service Organizations Administration in Social Work 373 272-85
[17] Asrar-ul-Haq, M, & Anwar, S 2016 A systematic review of knowledge management and knowledge sharing:
Trends, issues, and challenges Cogent Business & Management, 31
[18] Liyanage, C, Elhag, T, Ballal, T, & Li, Q 2009 Knowledge communication and translation–a knowledge transfer model Journal of Knowledge management 133 1181-31
[19] Paulin, D, & Suneson, K 2015 Knowledge transfer, knowledge sharing and knowledge barriers–three blurry terms in KM Leading Issues in Knowledge Management 22 73
[20] Reychav, I dan Weisberg, J, 2010 Bridging intention and behavior of knowledge sharing, Journal of Knowledge Management 1422 285-300
[21] Yoo, DY, 2014 Substructures of perceived Knowledge quality and interactions with knowledge sharing and innovativeness: a sensemaking perspective Journal of Knowledge Management 183 523 – 537
[22] Amayah, AT 2013, “Determinants of knowledge sharing in a public sector organization”, Journal of Knowledge Management 173 454-471
[23] Cyr, S, dan Choo, CW, 2010The individual and social dynamics of knowledge sharing: an exploratory study
Journal of Documentation 666 824 – 846
[24] Lee, H S, dan Hong, S A 2014 Factors affecting hospital employees' knowledge sharing intention and behavior, and innovation behavior Osong public health and research perspectives 53 148-155
[25] Kankanhalli, A, Tan, BCY dan Wei, KK 2005 Contributing Knowledge to electronic Knowledge repositories: an empirical investigation MIS Quarterly 291113-143
[26] Bock, G W, Zmud, R W, Kim, Y G, & Lee, J N 2005 Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate MIS quarterly 87-111
[27] Wasko, MM dan Faraj, S 2005 Why should I share? Examining social capital and Knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice MIS Quarterly 291 35-57
[28] Chandler, G N, Keller, C dan Lyon, D W,2000 Unraveling the determinants and consequences of an innovation-supportive organizational culture Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 251 59-76
[29] Hsu, I 2008 knowledge sharing practices as facilitating factor for improving organizational performance through human capital: A preliminary study Experts Systems with Applications 35 1316-1326
[30] Tan, HH dan Zhao, B 2003 Individual and perceived contextual-level antecedents of individual technical information inquiry in organizations The Journal of Psychology 1376 597-621
[31] Lee, H dan Choi, B 2003 Knowledge Management enablers, processes, dan organizational performance: an
integrative view and empirical examination”, Journal of Management Information Systems 201 179-228
[32] Yeh, Y J, Lai, S Q, & Ho, C T 2006 Knowledge Management enablers: A case study
Industrial Management and Data Systems 1066 793-810
[33] Ross, WH dan Wieland, C 1996 Effects of interpersonal trust and time pressure on managerial mediation strategy in a simulated organizational dispute Journal of Applied Psychology 813 228-248
[34] Skyrme, D 1997 Knowledge Management: Oxymoron or Dynamic Duo? Managing Information 47 24-26
[35] Creswell, John W,2014 Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches 4th ed
(California : SAGE Publications)
[36] Pandit, N R 1996 The creation of theory: A recent application of the grounded theory method The qualitative report 24 1-15
[37] Corbin, J M, & Strauss, A 1990 Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria
Qualitative sociology 131 3-21
[38] Shah, S K, & Corley, K G 2006 Building better theory by bridging the quantitative– qualitative divide Journal of management studies 438 1821-1835
[39] Noor, N M, & Salim, J 2011 Factors influencing employee knowledge sharing capabilities in electronic government agencies in Malaysia International Journal of Computer Science Issues 84 106
[40] Aslani, F, Mousakhani, M, & Aslani, A 2012 Knowledge sharing: a survey, assessment and directions for future research: individual behavior perspective World Academy of Science Engineering and Technology 668 310-314
[41] Okyere-Kwakye, E, & Nor, K M 2011 Individual factors and knowledge sharing American Journal of Economics and Business Administration 31 66-72
[42] Acedo, F, Barroso, C, Galan, J, 2006 The resource-based theory: Dissemination and main trends Strategic Management Journal 277 621-636
[43] Demarest, M, 1997 Understading Knowledge Management Long Range Planning 30 374– 38
[44] Crossan, M M, Lane, H W, & White, R E, 1999 An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution Academy of management review 243 522-537
[45] Nonaka, I 1995 The Knowledge-creating company Cambridge (MA: Harvard Business Press)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
