The de Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale used with Norwegian club- house members: Psychometric properties and associated factors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/73jcrn45Abstract
Background: Loneliness is considered a common experience, but persistent loneliness can set the stage for de- pression and in other ways jeopardize psychological well-being. Loneliness appears to be particularly frequent among persons with mental health problems, and a short, feasible, and psychometrically sound measure of loneliness can assist in addressing loneliness in mental health practice and research.
Aims: To contribute to the validation of a Norwegian version of the six-item de Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale. We empirically investigated the factor structure and internal consistency of the scale, and explored factors associated with the resulting scales.
Method: Ninety-four Norwegian clubhouse members completed the loneliness scale as part of a larger member survey in 2016. Factor structure was examined with Principal Components Analysis, in conjunction with Paral- lel Analysis, and internal consistency was examined with Cronbach’s coefficient alpha.
Results: Two factors were extracted from the data, explaining 68.2 % of the total data variance. The structure matrix showed no cross-loadings, and all items loaded substantially (0.74-0.91) on the proposed factor. Internal consistency of the items belonging to factor 1 (social loneliness) and factor 2 (emotional loneliness) was α =
0.86 and 0.63, respectively. No variables showed a significant relationship with any of the scales.
Conclusions: The scale demonstrated the theoretically proposed two-factor structure, with good measures of internal consistency. Thus, the de Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale appears promising for future use in psychosocial settings in Norway.
Downloads
References
Bartlett, M. S. (1954). A note on multiplying factors for various chi square approximations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 16(2), 296-298.
Beidas, R. S., Stewart, R. E., Walsh, L., Lucas, S., Downey, M. M., Jackson, K., . . . Mandell, D. S. (2015). Free, brief, and validated: Standardized instruments for low-resource mental health settings. Cognitive and behavioral practice, 22(1), 5-19. doi:10.1016/j.cbpra.2014.02.002
Borys, S., & Perlman, D. (1985). Gender differences in loneliness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11(1), 63-
74. doi:10.1177/0146167285111006
Bugay, A. (2007). Loneliness and life satisfaction of Turkish university students. Accessed 1 september 2018, from www.ece.salford.ac.uk/proceedings/papers/38_07.pdf
Buz, J., & Perez-Arechaederra, D. (2014). Psychometric properties and measurement invariance of the Spanish version of the 11-item De Jong Gierveld loneliness scale. International Psychogeriatrics, 26(9), 1553-1564. doi:10.1017/s1041610214000507
Cacioppo, J. T., Hughes, M. E., Waite, L. J., Hawkley, L. C., & Thisted, R. A. (2006). Loneliness as a specific risk factor for depressive symptoms: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Psychology and Aging, 21(1), 140-151. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.140
Carolan, M., Onaga, E., Pernice-Duca, F., & Jimenez, T. (2011). A place to be: The role of clubhouses in facilitating social support. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 35(2), 125-132. doi:10.2975/35.2.2011.125.132
Cerny, B. A., & Kaiser, H. F. (1977). A study of a measure of sampling adequacy for factor-analytic correlation matrices. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 12(1), 43-47. doi:10.1207/s15237906mbr1201_3
Chang, C. W., Chung, C. L., Biegel, D. E., Pernice-Duca, F., Min, M. O., & D'Angelo, L. (2014). Predictors of loneliness of clubhouse members. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 37(1), 51-54. doi:10.1037/prj0000052
Chipuer, H. M., & Pretty, G. H. (2000). Facets of adolescents' loneliness: A study of rural and urban Australian youth. Australian Psychologist, 35(3), 233-237. doi:10.1080/00050060008257484
Clubhouse International (2016). International standards for clubhouse programs. Accessed 1 September 2018, from https://www.clubhouse-intl.org/documents/standards_2016_eng.pdf
Clubhouse International (2017). Creating community: Changing the world of mental health. Accessed 1 September 2018, from http://clubhouse-intl.org/what-we-do/what-clubhouses-do/
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159.
de Jong Gierveld, J., & Tesch-Romer, C. (2012). Loneliness in old age in Eastern and Western European societies: theoret- ical perspectives. European Journal of Ageing, 9(4), 285-295. doi:10.1007/s10433-012-0248-2
de Jong Gierveld, J., & van Tilburg, T. (2006). A 6-item scale for overall, emotional, and social loneliness. Confirmatory tests on survey data. Research on Aging, 28(5), 582-598. doi:10.1177/0164027506289723
de Jong Gierveld, J., & Van Tilburg, T. (2010). The De Jong Gierveld short scales for emotional and social loneliness: tested on data from 7 countries in the UN generations and gender surveys. European Journal of Ageing, 7(2), 121-130. doi:10.1007/s10433-010-0144-6
Dykstra, P. A., & de Jong Gierveld, J. (2004). Gender and marital-history differences in emotional and social loneliness among Dutch older adults. Canadian Journal of Aging, 23(2), 141-155.
Dykstra, P. A., van Tilburg, T. G., & de Jong Gierveld, J. (2005). Changes in older adult loneliness: Results from a seven- year longitudinal study. Research on Aging, 27(6), 725-747. doi:10.1177/0164027505279712
Hansen, T., & Slagsvold, B. (2016). Late-life loneliness in 11 European countries: Results from the Generations and Gen- der survey. Social Indicators Research, 129(1), 445-464. doi:10.1007/s11205-015-1111-6
Hawkley, L. C., Hughes, M. E., Waite, L. J., Masi, C. M., Thisted, R. A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2008). From Social Structural Factors to Perceptions of Relationship Quality and Loneliness: The Chicago Health, Aging, and Social Relations Study.
The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 63(6), S375-S384. doi:10.1093/geronb/63.6.S375
Herman, S. E., Onaga, E., Pernice-Duca, F., Oh, S., & Ferguson, C. (2005). Sense of community in clubhouse programs: member and staff concepts. American Journal of Community Psychology, 36(3-4), 343-356.
Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179-185. doi:10.1007/BF02289447
IBM Corporation. (2016). SPSS for Windows, version 24. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36. doi:10.1007/BF02291817
Kielhofner, G. (2006). Research in occupational therapy: Methods of inquiry for enhancing practice. Philadelphia: FA Davis Company.
Masi, C. M., Chen, H.-Y., Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010). A Meta-Analysis of Interventions to Reduce Loneli- ness. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(3), 219-266. doi:10.1177/1088868310377394
McKay, C., Nugent, K. L., Johnsen, M., Eaton, W. W., & Lidz, C. W. (2016). A Systematic Review of Evidence for the Clubhouse Model of Psychosocial Rehabilitation. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 1-20. doi:10.1007/s10488-016-0760-3
Moore, D., & Schultz, N. R. (1983). Loneliness at adolescence: Correlates, attributions, and coping. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 12(2), 95-100. doi:10.1007/bf02088307
Mykletun, A., Knudsen, A. K., & Mathisen, K. S. (2009). Mental illness in Norway: A public health perspective [Psykiske lidelser i Norge: Et folkhelseperspektiv]. Oslo: Norwegian Institute of Public Health.
Nilsson, B., Lindstrom, U. A., & Nåden, D. (2006). Is loneliness a psychological dysfunction? A literary study of the phe- nomenon of loneliness. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 20(1), 93-101. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6712.2006.00386.x
Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Ahrens, C. (2002). Age differences and similarities in the correlates of depressive symptoms. Psy- chology and Aging, 17(1), 116-124. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.17.1.116
Nummela, O., Seppanen, M., & Uutela, A. (2011). The effect of loneliness and change in loneliness on self-rated health (SRH): a longitudinal study among aging people. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 53(2), 163-167. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2010.10.023
Page, R. M., & Cole, G. E. (1991). Demographic predictors of self-reported loneliness in adults. Psychological Reports, 68(3), 939-945. doi:10.2466/pr0.1991.68.3.939
Penning, M., Liu, G., & Chou, P. H. B. (2014). Measuring loneliness among middle-aged and older adults: The UCLA and de Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scales. Social Indicators Research, 118(3), 1147-1166. doi:10.1007/s11205-013-0461-1
Perlman, D., & Peplau, L. A. (1984). Loneliness research: A survey of empirical findings. In L. A. Peplau & S. E. Gold- ston (Eds.), Preventing the harmful consequences of severe and persistent loneliness (pp. 13-46). Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health.
Propst, R. N. (1997). Stages in Realizing the International Diffusion of a Single Way of Working: The Clubhouse Model. New Directions for Mental Health Services, 1997(74), 53-66.
Raeburn, T., Halcomb, E., Walter, G., & Cleary, M. (2013). An overview of the clubhouse model of psychiatric rehabilita- tion. Australasian Psychiatry, 21(4), 376-378. doi:10.1177/1039856213492235
Ritter, V. C., Fekete, O., Nordli, H., & Bonsaksen, T. (2018). User satisfaction and its associated factors among members of a Norwegian clubhouse for persons with mental illness. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 22(1), 5- 14.
Ritter, V. C., Fekete, O. R., Nordli, H., & Bonsaksen, T. (2018). Measuring perceived outcomes from participating at a clubhouse for persons with mental illness: psychometric properties and associated factors (in press). Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy. doi:10.1080/11038128.2018.1508496
Salimi, A. (2011). Social-emotional loneliness and life satisfaction. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 292-
295. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.241
Scharf, T., & de Jong Gierveld, J. (2008). Loneliness in urban neighbourhoods: an Anglo-Dutch comparison. European Journal of Aging, 5(2), 103-115. doi:10.1007/s10433-008-0080-x
Tanaka, K., & Davidson, L. (2015a). Meanings associated with the core component of clubhouse life: The work-ordered day. Psychiatric Quarterly, 86(2), 269-283. doi: 10.1007/s11126-014-9330-6
Tanaka, K., & Davidson, L. (2015b). Reciprocity in the clubhouse context. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabili- tation, 19(2), 21-33.
Thorsen, K., & Clausen, S. (2008). Who are the lonely? [Hvem er de ensomme?] Oslo: Statistics Norway.
Tümkaya, S., Aybek, B., & Çelik, M. (2008). An investigation of students’ life satisfaction and loneliness level in a sam- ple of Turkish students. Journal of Human Sciences, 5(1).
Wang, J., Mann, F., Lloyd-Evans, B., Ma, R., & Johnson, S. (2018). Associations between loneliness and perceived social support and outcomes of mental health problems: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry, 18, 156. doi:10.1186/s12888-018- 1736-5
Wild, D., Grove, A., Martin, M., Eremenco, S., McElroy, S., Verjee-Lorenz, A., & Erikson, P. (2005). Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: Report of the ISPOR Task Force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value in Health, 8(2), 94-104.
Wiseman, H., Guttfreund, D. G., & Lurie, I. (1995). Gender differences in loneliness and depression of university students seeking counselling. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 23(2), 231-243. doi:10.1080/03069889508253008
Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psy- chological Bulletin, 99(3), 432-442. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.432
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
