Isolating and Identification germs of Staphylococcus aureus from of butchers' Shops Instrument in the Shekhan District

Authors

  • Abdullah. M. Al-Saiegh Department of Community Health, Technical College of Health Shekhan, Duhok polytechnic University, Duhok, Kurdistan Regional Government- Iraq Author
  • Raghdah Mahdi Department of Community Health, Technical College of Health Shekhan, Duhok polytechnic University, Duhok, Kurdistan Regional Government- Iraq Author
  • Sabah Meskeen Department of Community Health, Technical College of Health Shekhan, Duhok polytechnic University, Duhok, Kurdistan Regional Government- Iraq Author
  • Shreen ftah Department of Community Health, Technical College of Health Shekhan, Duhok polytechnic University, Duhok, Kurdistan Regional Government- Iraq Author
  • Wesam Zedan Department of Community Health, Technical College of Health Shekhan, Duhok polytechnic University, Duhok, Kurdistan Regional Government- Iraq Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/asyrs569

Keywords:

Instruments Butchers, Bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus, Sheikhan distract

Abstract

The aim of the study was conducted to isolation microbial contamination in butchers instruments and meat in shekhan district, and identify the most important bacterial species associated with these instruments. 65 samples were taking from different localities of Shekhan district distributed among (9 samples from kalakchi area, 15 samples from chera area, 21 samples from qasrok area and 20 samples from shekhan) After taken sample by a swab from tools of butcher's shops (Knife ,hooks , cutting board and meat grinder) after that the samples were taken to the laboratory of shekhan technical colleague of health for completion process of culturing, isolated and examined of the bacterial species and studying the morphological biochemical characteristics of bacteria by using culture media. The results of the current study showed growth six different species of bacteria were Staphylococcus aureus 24 samples (36%) Staphylococcus epidermidis 9 samples (14%), Staphylococcus saprophytes 5 samples (8%), Streptococcus 9 samples (14%), Bacilli species 2 sample (3%) , Gram negative species 16 samples (25%) . At the conclusion of this study, two types of bacteria were isolated the first of which was gram negative and its proportion was (25%) the second was gram positive and its proportion was (75%), Identified six species of bacteria was staphylococcus aureus, staphylococcus epidermidis, staphylococcus saprophytous, streptococcus and bacilli species.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Baron, S. (1996). Alphaviruses (Togaviridae) and Flaviviruses (Flaviviridae). In Medical Microbiology. University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston.

2. Boler, D.D., & Woerner, D.R. (2017). What is meat? A perspective from the American Meat Science Association. Animal Frontiers, 7(4), 8–11.

3. Bouvet, C., Gjoni, S., Zenelaj, B., Lipsky, B.A., Hakko, E., & Uçkay, I. (2017). Staphylococcus aureus soft tissue infection may increase the risk of subsequent staphylococcal soft tissue infections. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 60, 44–48.

4. Canencia, O.P., Dalugdug, M.D., Emano, A.M.B., Mendoza, R.C., & Walag, A.M.P. (2016). Slaughter waste effluents and river catchment watershed contamination in Cagayan de Oro City, Philippines. J Biodivers Conserv Environ Sci, 9(2), 142–148.

5. Cohen-Poradosu, R., & Dennis, L. (2007). Group A Streptococcus Epidemiology and Vaccine Implications. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 45(7), 863–865. https://doi.org/10.1086/521263

6. Ferretti, J.J., et al. (2001). Complete genome sequence of an M1 strain of Streptococcus pyogenes. PNAS, 98(8), 4658–4663. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.071559398

7. Fong, F. (2017). Food Safety Platform: Bacteria in Raw Meat vs Cooked Meat. Food Safety Focus, 130 (May 2017).

8. Fredrickson, J.K., et al. (2004). Geomicrobiology of high-level nuclear waste contaminated vadose sediments at the Hanford Site, Washington State. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 70(7), 4230–4241.

9. CDC (2007). Group A Streptococcal (GAS) Disease. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (Archived December 19). Retrieved November 21, 2012.

10. Kuroda, M., et al. (2005). Whole genome sequence of Staphylococcus saprophyticus reveals the pathogenesis of uncomplicated urinary tract infection. PNAS, 102(37), 13272–13277.

11. Lawrie, R.A., & Ledward, D.A. (2006). Lawrie's Meat Science (7th ed.). Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Limited.

12. Masalha, M., et al. (2001). Analysis of transcription of the Staphylococcus aureus aerobic class Ib and anaerobic class III ribonucleotide reductase genes in response to oxygen. Journal of Bacteriology, 183(24), 7260–7272.

13. O’Gara, J.P., & Humphreys, H. (2001). Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms: importance and implications. Journal of Medical Microbiology, 50(7), 582–587.

14. Oniciuc, E.A., Nicolau, A.I., Hernández, M., & Rodríguez-Lázaro, D. (2017). Presence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the food chain. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 61, 49–59.

15. Rappé, M.S., & Giovannoni, S.J. (2003). The uncultured microbial majority. Annual Review of Microbiology, 57, 369–394.

16. Schleifer, K.H., & Kloos, W.E. (1975). Isolation and characterization of staphylococci from human skin. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 25(1), 50–61.

17. Tong, S.Y., Davis, J.S., Eichenberger, E., Holland, T.L., & Fowler, V.G. (2015). Staphylococcus aureus infections: epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 28(3), 603–661.

18. Tuazon, C.U., et al. (1979). Serious infections from Bacillus sp. JAMA, 241(11), 1137–1140.

19. Zhang, X., Owens, C.M., & Schilling, M.W. (2017). Meat: the edible flesh from mammals only or does it include poultry, fish, and seafood? Animal Frontiers, 7(4), 12–18.

Downloads

Published

06.06.2020

Issue

Vol. 24 No. 10 (2020): 24 (10) 2020

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

How to Cite

Al-Saiegh, A. M., Mahdi, R., Meskeen, S., Shreen ftah, & Zedan, W. (2020). Isolating and Identification germs of Staphylococcus aureus from of butchers’ Shops Instrument in the Shekhan District. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(10), 2215-2224. https://doi.org/10.61841/asyrs569