Visitors Experience and Non-Formal Science Learning (NFSL) Approaches in Malaysia

Authors

  • Norzilawati Md. Kamsor Faculty of Administrative Science and Policy Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia Author
  • Jasmine Ahmad Faculty of Administrative Science and Policy Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia Author
  • Mahadir Ladisma Awis Faculty of Administrative Science and Policy Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/5nq0gd96

Keywords:

visitor’s service experience, servicescape, non-formal science learning (NFSL), science centre

Abstract

This paper explores two issues, one, Non-Formal Science Learning (NFSL) approaches offered at the National Science Centre (NSC) through visitors’ service experience and its influences on services; and two, the various theories on non-formal learning and its applicability for conceptualizing the NFSL. The pre-interview was intended to clarify on the variables for conceptualizing the effectiveness of NFSL at the science centre. Fifteen (15) visitors were interviewed to examine the learning approaches that visitors appreciate (physical servicescape, social servicescape and service delivery) and how these lead to the effectiveness of the main services offered by the science centre. The preliminary survey reveals that 90% of the respondents felt that the physical servicescape of the premise affect mood during the visit and highlighted specific issues on the cleanliness, temperature, odours and functionality of a few equipment/ exhibits in the galleries that may turn off their mood during the visit. 80% of the respondents highlighted social servicescape was missing. The staff at the centre was hardly seen on the ground, and respondents added that the lack of help from the staff might influence their decision to revisit the science centre in the future. Service delivery was assessed on two factors, namely the parking facility and service speed. Though the respondents complained about the location of the parking area, the majority of them agreed that the service speed level was acceptable. 95% of the respondents admit learning at least one new thing about science, technology, and innovation (STI) during the visit. Overall, 70% of the respondents enjoyed their visit to the NSC. The Environmental Psychology Theory, Social Learning Theory and Experiential Learning Theory are potential theories in conceptualizing and understanding the visitor’s services experience to overcome issues on decreasing interest of the public in STI awareness programs and increase the STI popularization in the society.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Academy of Science Malaysia. (2015). Science Outlook 2015: Action Towards Vision. (Academy of Science Malaysia, Ed.). Kuala Lumpur: Academy of Science Malaysia. Retrieved from

http://www.youblisher.com/p/1432982-Science-Outlook-2015/

2. Ainsworth, H., & Eaton, S. (2010). Formal, Non-formal and Informal Learning in the Sciences. (J. Clydesdale, Ed.), Sciences-New York (1st. ed.). Calgary, Canada: Onate Press, Eaton International Consulting Inc.

3. Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. (Stanford University, Ed.) (1st ed.). New York: General Learning Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1978.tb01621.x

4. Bandura, A. (1978). Social Learning Theory of Aggression. Journal of Communication, 28(3), 12–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1978.tb01621.x

5. Baniyamin, N., & Rashid, M. M. (2016). Understanding Science Centre Engagement in Nurturing Visitor Interest and Curiosity. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 222(222), 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.152

6. Barker, R. G. (1968). Ecological Psychology: Concepts and Methods for Studying the Environment and Human Behavior. (Kansas University, Ed.). California: Stanford University Press.

7. Berry, N., & Mayer, S. (1989). Museum Education: History, Theory and Practice The. Virginia: National Art Education Association Virginia.

8. Chang, W. L., & Huang, L. Y. (2016). Measuring Service Experience: A Utility-Based Heuristic Model.

Service Business, 10(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-014-0263-9

9. Chik, W., Ismail, N., & Azman, N. (2010). Diverse Learning Styles of Non Formal Adult Learners in Community Colleges in Malaysia. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7(2), 139–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.020

10. Çil, E., Maccario, N., & Yanmaz, D. (2016). Design, Implementation and Evaluation of Innovative Science Teaching Strategies for Non-Formal Learning in a Natural History Museum. Research in Science & Technological Education, 34(3), 325–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2016.1222360

11. Collier, J. E., Barnes, D. C., Abney, A. K., & Pelletier, M. J. (2018). Idiosyncratic Service Experiences: When Customers Desire the Extraordinary in a Service Encounter. Journal of Business Research, 84(November 2017), 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.016

12. Donitsa-Schmidt, S., & Zuzovsky, R. (2018). The effect of formal, nonformal and informal learning on teachers’ promotion to middle leadership roles in schools. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 00(00), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2018.1508754

13. Edvardsson, B. (2005). Service Quality: Beyond Cognitive Assessment. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 15(2), 127–131. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520510585316

14. Eshach, H. (2007). In-school and Out-of-school Learning: Formal, Non-Formal, and Informal Education.

Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(2), 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/sl0956-006-9027-l

15. Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (1997). School Field Trips: Assessing Their Long-Term Impact. Curator: The Museum Journal, 40(3), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.1997.tb01304.x

16. Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2013). The Musuem Experience Revisited (1st. Ed.). Walnut Greek, CA, CA: Left Coast Press, Inc.

17. Falk, J. H., Needham, M. D., Dierking, L. D., & Prendergast, L. (2014). Final Report: International Science Centre Impact Study. OR USA.

18. Hunter, M. (2017, June 22). The world’s 20 most popular museums. Retrieved January 22, 2018, from http://edition.cnn.com/travel/article/most-popular-museums-world-2016/index.html

19. Inthiran, A., Alhashmi, S. M., & Ahmed, P. K. (2015). A Preliminary Study on the Usage of Search Assisting Features when Searching for a Personal Health Task. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 67(2), 159–

181. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-09-2014-0110

20. Kamolpattana, S., Chen, G., Sonchaeng, P., Wilkinson, C., & Willey, N. (2015). Thai Visitors’ Expectations and Experiences of Explainer Interaction Within a Science Museum Context. Public Understanding of Science, 24(1), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662514525560

21. Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. (A. Neidlinger & J. G. Levine, Eds.) (2nd Ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

22. Line, N. D., Hanks, L., & Zhang, L. (2018). Birds of a Feather Donate Together: Understanding the Relationship Between the Social Servicescape and CSR Participation. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 71(April 2017), 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.11.012

23. MASTIC. (2014). Public Awareness of Science, Technology and Innovation Malaysia 2014. Putrajaya. Retrieved from https://mastic.mosti.gov.my/en/sti-indicatiors/public-awareness-science-technology- innovation-sti-malaysia

24. Mehrabean, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An Approach to Environmental Psychology. Cambridge. MA: US: The MIT Press.

25. MOE. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013 - 2025. Ministry of Education Malaysia (1st ed., Vol. 27). Putrajaya, Malaysia: Ministry of Education, Malaysia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007

26. MOE. (2018). The Explanation of Education Policy. Retrieved August 29, 2018, from https://www.moe.gov.my/images/KPM/UKK/2018/04 Apr/Slide Penerangan Dasar KPM Tahun 2018 - PDF.pdf

27. Mohd Azhar, A. H., Muhammed Fauzi, O., & Othman, A. K. (2003). Pendidikan Bukan Formal (PBF) di Malaysia: Cabaran Dan Hala Tuju Wawasan 2020. Seminar Kebangsaan Memperkasakan Sistem Pendidikan. Retrieved from http://eprints.utm.my/2287/1/PENDIDIKAN_BUKAN_FORMAL_DI_MALAYSIA.pdf

28. Moldovan, O., & Bocoş-Binţinţan, V. (2015). The Necessity of Reconsidering the Concept of Non-formal Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 209(July), 337–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.245

29. MOSTI. (2016). National Science & Technology Policy: Utilizing STI for Socio-Economic Transformation and Inclusive Growth. Ministry of Science, Technology & Innovation Malaysia. Putrajaya. Retrieved from https://www.mosti.gov.my/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Full-DSTIN-2016.pdf

30. Norqvist, L., & Leffler, E. (2017). Learning in non-formal education: Is it “youthful” for youth in action?

International Review of Education, 63(2), 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-017-9631-8

31. NSC. (2011a). Annual Report: National Science Centre 2011. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Retrieved from http://www.psn.gov.my/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Laporan-Tahunan-2011.pdf

32. NSC. (2011b). The 25 Years Journey of the National Science Centre. (National Science Centre Malaysia, Ed.) (1st ed.). Kuala Lumpur: National Science Centre Malaysia.

33. NSTA. (2012). An NSTA Position Statement: Learning Science in Informal Environments. New York: National Science Teachers Association. Retrieved from http://static.nsta.org/pdfs/PositionStatement_Informal.pdf

34. Qi, L. (2017, June 15). China Museum No. 1 in Visit Last Year. China Daily, p. 20. Retrieved from http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/culture/2017-06/15/content_29754417.htm

35. Rennie, L. J., & Mcclafferty, T. P. (1995). Using Visits to Interactive Science and Technology Centers , Museums , Aquaria and Zoos to Promote Learning in Science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 6(4), 175–185.

36. Rosenbaum, M. S., & Massiah, C. (2011). An Expanded Servicescape Perspective. Journal of Service Management, 22(4), 471–490. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564231111155088

37. Science Centre Singapore. (2013). Science Centre Singapore Annual report 2012-2013. Singapore. Retrieved from http://www.science.edu.sg/aboutus/Documents/Science Centre Annual Report 2012-2013.pdf

38. Su, Y., & Teng, W. (2018). Contemplating Museums’ Service Failure: Extracting the Service Quality Dimensions of Museums from Negative On-Line Reviews. Tourism Management, 69(June), 214–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.06.020

39. Tudor, S. L. (2013). Formal – Non-formal – Informal in Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 76, 821–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.213

40. Wan Mustapha, W. N. (2017, December). Moving Away from Exam-Oriented Mentality. New Straits Times.

41. Werquin, P. (2010). Recognising Non-Formal and Informal Learning: Outcomes, Policies and Practices. (A. Hassan & D. Roseveare, Eds.), OECD (1st ed.). OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264063853-en

42. Wong, I. K. A. (2013). Exploring Customer Equity and the Role of Service Experience in the Casino Service Encounter. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 32(1), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2012.04.007

43. Yiu, E. M. L., Kong, J., Fong, R., & Chan, K. M. K. (2010). A Preliminary Study of a Quantitative Analysis Method for High Speed Laryngoscopic Images. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12(6), 520–528. https://doi.org/10.3109/17549501003759221

Downloads

Published

31.08.2020

How to Cite

Kamsor, N. M., Ahmad, J., & Awis, M. L. (2020). Visitors Experience and Non-Formal Science Learning (NFSL) Approaches in Malaysia. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(6), 14281-14297. https://doi.org/10.61841/5nq0gd96