THE EFFECT OF EDUCATION, DISCIPLINE, AND PERFORMANCE ON JOB SATISFACTION AT THE COMPANY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/wpzx0144Keywords:
Education, work discipline, employee performance, job satisfactionAbstract
Employee education, employee discipline, and employee performance have a positive and significant effect on job satisfaction, with a t.count value of 3.112 and a significant value of 0.002, and with a significance limit < 0.05, then Ho is rejected, and Ha is accepted. Work discipline has no individual relation on employee performance, with t.count of 0.864 and significant value of 0.390, and with a significance limit < 0.05, then Ho is accepted, and Ha is rejected. Job satisfaction has no particular effect on employee performance, with t.count of 0.228 and significant value of 0.820, and with a significance limit < 0.05, then Ho is accepted, and Ha is rejected. Based on the results, it is found that the adjusted R2 is 0.090, this means that 9% of dependent variables are influenced by independent variables consisting of variables of educational backgrounds, work discipline, job satisfaction. Employee education, work discipline, job satisfaction do simultaneously affect on job satisfaction at the company, which is based on the results of the regression test, it is found that the independent variables are normally distributed.
Downloads
References
1. Abbas, J., Aman, J., & Nurunnabi, M. (2019). The Impact of Social Media on Learning Behavior for Sustainable Education: Evidence of Students from Selected Universities in Pakistan, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061683
2. Abdullah, C., Mamun, A., & Hasan, N. (2017). Factors affecting employee turnover and sound retention strategies in business organization: a conceptual view, 15(1), 63–71.
3. Abuhashesh, M. Y., Aldmour, R., & Ed, R. (2019). Factors that affect Employees Job Satisfaction and Performance to Increase Customers’ Satisfactions, (April). https://doi.org/10.5171/2019.354277
4. Adams, A., & Cox, A. L. (2008). Questionnaires, in-depth interviews and focus groups. Open Research Online, The Open University’s repository.
5. Alexandre, J. (n.d.). When is statistical significance not significant?, (1), 31–55.
6. Arulrajah, A. A., Opatha, H. H. D. N. P., & Navaratne, N. (2016). Employee Green Performance of Job: A Systematic Attempt towards Measurement, (December). https://doi.org/10.4038/sljhrm.v6i1.5631
7. Bandung, I. T. (2018). Modeling an Effective Corporate Social Responsibility Based on Systems Theory and Management Functions: A Case Study, 19(40), 249–261.
8. Biruta, S., Kantane, I., & Dzelme, J. (2015). Expectations by Employers on Skills, Knowledge and Attitudes of Employees, (November). https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.eis.0.9.12809
9. Bornay-Barrachina, M. (2019). How Should Employees Be Managed in an International Context? International Human Resource Management, (April). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5781-4
10. Carmichael, T., & Cunningham, N. (2017). Theoretical Data Collection and Data Analysis with Gerunds in a Constructivist Grounded Theory Study, (October).
11. Clawson, J. G., & New, J. R. (2014). The ‘Modest Achievements’ of Stephen P. Robbins, (August).
12. Daoud, J. I. (2017). Multicollinearity and Regression Analysis.
13. Eastman, C., & Liston, K. (n.d.). BIM Handbook Paul Teicholz, Rafael Sacks.
14. Hussinki, H. (2017). Review of empirical research on knowledge management practices and firm performance. Journal of Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-09-2015-0336
15. Inuwa, M. (2017). Job Satisfaction and Employee Performance: An Empirical Approach, (January 2016).
16. Jassim, R. K. (2014). Competitive Advantage Through the Employees, (January 1998).
17. Tubey, R., Rotich, K. J., Kurgat, A., et al. (2015). History, Evolution and Development of Human Resource Management: A Contemporary Perspective, 7(9), 139–149.
18. Kim, T. K. (2015). T test as a parametric statistic, (Table 2).
19. Mooi, E. (2016). Regression Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53965-7
20. Muhammad, S., & Kabir, S. (2018). Formulating and testing hypothesis, (June).
21. United Nations. (n.d.). Human Resources Management and Training.
22. Okoye, P. V. C., & Ezejiofor, R. A. (2013). The Effect of Human Resources Development on Organizational Productivity, 3(10), 250–268. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v3-i10/295
23. Rafferty, A. E., & Griffin, M. (2016). Job satisfaction in organizational research, (April).
24. Razak, A., Sarpan, S., & Ramlan, R. (2018). Effect of Leadership Style, Motivation and Work Discipline on Employee Performance in PT. ABC Makassar, 8(6), 67–71.
25. Saari, L. M., & Judge, T. A. (2018). Employee Attitudes and Job Satisfaction, (June). https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20032
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
