A Move-based Analysis of illocutionary Speech Acts in American Presidential War Rhetoric
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/5bhb4331Keywords:
illocutionary speech acts, presidential war rhetoric, move-based analysisAbstract
Presidential war discourse in particular is commonly investigated through the use of critical discourse analysis tools. Seldom attempts have been carried out to study this type of rhetoric in view of a move based analysis of illocutionary speech acts. Being a genre in its own, the particulars of the presidential war rhetoric are framed into narrated events within conventional move-structures realized by illocutionary speech acts indicative of the communicative function of each move to justify American present course of military action. After the study shows that American presidents organize their war rhetoric, in terms of a succession of seven cognitive move-structures, the study mainly focuses on investigating the types of illocutionary speech acts performed in each exigence or rhetorical move and identifying how they behave in realizing the local communicative function of the moves which, in turn, contribute to the communicative purpose of the genre as a whole. These exigences or move-structures are established by the events, the needs of the audience, and the purposes of the president. The results of the study show that the types of illocutionary speech acts performed by presidents vary in terms of the way these acts respond to the exigences that call them forth (the rhetorical moves in the present study).
Downloads
References
1. Alattar, R. A. S. (2014). A Speech Act Analysis of American Presidential Speeches. Arts Journal, 110, 1–40.
2. Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Irvine, C. K. S., & Walker, D. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. Belmont: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
3. Bach, K., & Harnish, R. M. (1979). Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
4. Benoit, W. (2009). Generic Elements in Rhetoric. In A. J. Kuypers (Ed.), Rhetorical Criticism: Perspectives in Action (pp. 77–96). Toronto, Canada: Lexington Books.
5. Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.
6. Bhatia, V. K. (2004). Worlds of Written Discourse: A Genre-Based View. London: Continuum.
7. Campbell, K. K., & Jamieson, K. H. (1990). Deeds Done in Words: Presidential Rhetoric and the Genres of Governance. University of Chicago Press.
8. Campbell, K. K., & Jamieson, K. H. (2008). Presidents Creating the Presidency: Deeds Done in Words. University of Chicago Press.
9. Condit, C. M. (1985). The Functions of Epideictic: The Boston Massacre Orations as Exemplar. Communication Quarterly, 33(4), 284–298.
10. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. London: Sage Publications.
11. Dow, B. J. (1989). The Function of Epideictic and Deliberative Strategies in Presidential Crisis Rhetoric. Western Journal of Communication, 53(3), 294–310.
12. Flick, U. (2010). An Introduction to Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications.
13. Freedman, A., & Medway, P. (2005). Genre and the New Rhetoric. London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
14. Glover, C. (2007). Sustaining Iraq: George W. Bush's Perspective of War. ProQuest. (Master Thesis). Central Michigan University.
15. Hart, R. P. (1984). The Sound of Leadership: Presidential Communication in the Modern Age. University of Chicago.
16. Hauser, G. A. (1999). Aristotle on Epideictic: The Formation of Public Morality. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 29(1), 5–23.
17. Hodges, A. (2013). The Generic US Presidential War Narrative. In Discourses of War and Peace (pp. 47–68). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Jackson, R. (2004). The Politics of Threat and Danger: Writing the War on Terrorism. Retrieved November 28, 2019 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/37147013
19. Kennedy, G. A. (Trans.). (2007). Aristotle: On Rhetoric. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Łazuka, A. (2006). Communicative Intention in George W. Bush's Presidential Speeches and Statements from 11 September 2001 to 11 September 2003. Discourse & Society, 17(3), 299–330.
21. Sigelman, L. (1996). Presidential Inaugurals: The Modernization of a Genre. Political Communication, 13(1), 81–92.
22. Trosborg, A. (2000). The Inaugural Address: President Clinton's 1993 Address. Analysing Professional Genres, 74, 121.
23. Upton, T. A., & Cohen, M. A. (2009). An Approach to Corpus-Based Discourse Analysis: The Move Analysis as Example. Discourse Studies, 11(5), 585–605.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
