Comparison of Two Types of Instruction in Physical Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/9k8jad13Keywords:
tactical learning model, technical learning model, polar GPS, distance, heart rateAbstract
This study aimed to know the effectiveness of physical education learning models using polar global positioning system (GPS) tool. This study evolved 57 students of class VII (12-13 years old) of Junior High School Lab School UPI Bandung. The researchers used quasi-experimental research using counterbalanced design. The instruments were Polar GPS RC3 and Polar Heart Rate Sensor H3 to measure the students’ heart rate and distance during the learning process. The study showed that the average acquisition of the students’ heart rate and distance during the learning process with the tactical learning model was higher than the technical learning model. It can be concluded that tactical learning model is more effective than technical learning model to be applied to the sport games learning if reviewed from the aspects of the students’ heart rate as well as the distance.
Downloads
References
1. B. Cohen and J. Kietzmann, “Ride On! Mobility Business Models for the Sharing Economy,” Organ. Environ., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 279–296, 2014.
2. A. Y. Haladi and Aisyaturrahmi, “Pengaruh Kualitas Layanan Terhadap Kepuasan Pelanggan Jasa Transportasi Gojek Di Kota Surabaya,” An-Nisbah J. Ekon. Syariah, vol. 5, no. 1, 2018.
3. A. A. Azzuhri and U. G. Mada, “A Creative, Innovative, and Solutive Transportation for Indonesia with Its Setbacks and How to Tackle Them: A Case Study of the Phenomenal GOJEK,” 2018.
4. A. Venera and V. Tselentis, “Designing the Model of Public Value Management,” Management Innov. Compet. Advantage, pp. 74–80, 2015.
5. A. J. A. Hendryanti, “Pengaruh Angkutan Online terhadap Angkutan Umum di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta,” e-journal UAJY, 2018.
6. E. Purnomo, “Pengemudi minta Pergub Taksi Online di Yogyakarta dibatalkan,” 2017. Online: https://www.merdeka.com/peristiwa/pengemudi-minta-pergub-taksi-online-di-yogyakarta-dibatalkan.html. Accessed: 14-Dec-2018.
7. S. R. Miller, “First Principles for Regulating the Sharing Economy,” SSRN Electron. J., 2015.
8. D. Selloni, “New Forms of Economies: Sharing Economy, Collaborative Consumption, Peer-to-Peer Economy,” CoDesign for Public-Interest Services. Springer International Publishing, pp. 15–26, 2017.
9. M. Schmalstich, “Sharing Economy’s Pattern,” 2018. Online: https://bmtoolbox.net/patterns/sharing-economy/. Accessed: 08-Oct-2018.
10. M. Yotawut, “Examining progress in research on public value,” Kasetsart J. Soc. Sci., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 168–173, 2018.
11. D. Hay and C. Cordery, “The value of public sector audit: Literature and history,” J. Account. Lit., vol. 40, pp. 1–15, 2018.
12. D. Chung and D. A. Hensher, “Public private partnerships in the provision of tolled roads: Shared value creation, trust and control,” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., vol. 118, pp. 341–359, 2018.
13. T. T. Marie, “Public values as essential criteria for public entrepreneurship: Water management in France,” Util. Policy, vol. 40, pp. 162–169, 2016.
14. D. Bromell, “Creating public value in the policy advice role: a reflection from the front line,” Policy Q., vol. 8, no. 4, 2012.
15. S. Yunus, S. Zainal, and F. Jalil, “Social Network, Trust and Collective Action of Aceh Farmers in Increasing Welfare,” Int. J. Psychosoc. Rehabil., vol. 24, no. Special Issue 2, pp. 184–192, Apr. 2020.
16. A. Nurmandi and E. P. Purnomo, “Making the strategic plan work in local government: A case study of strategic plan implementation in Yogyakarta Special Province (YSP),” Int. Rev. Public Adm., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 143–164, 2011.
17. E. Purnomo, “Pengemudi Minta Pergub-Taksi Online Di Yogyakarta-Dibatalkan,” 2017.
18. C. J. Martin, “The sharing economy: A pathway to sustainability or a nightmarish form of neoliberal capitalism?,” Ecol. Econ., vol. 121, pp. 149–159, 2016.
19. C. Mortreux et al., “Political economy of planned relocation: A model of action and inaction in government responses,” Glob. Environ. Chang., vol. 50, pp. 123–132, 2018.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
