Analysis of Government Regulation’s Response on Sharing Principles

Authors

  • E.P. PURNOMO Jusuf Kalla School of Government, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia Author
  • ROSMIATI MIA Jusuf Kalla School of Government, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia Author
  • MUTIARIN DYAH Jusuf Kalla School of Government, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/jxb40503

Keywords:

sharing economy principles, online transportation, government response

Abstract

The growth of sharing economy business models such as Indonesia's ride-sharing model is particularly interesting in the context of cities having issues with population growth and expanding density. In the province of Yogyakarta, the significant growth of Go-Jek Business Networks (Start-up) had also helped contribute to the several public responses, both positive and negative. The ride-sharing platform has rapidly embraced the rise of ride-hailing apps to add convenience to people's lives. However, it disrupts the market and the government which create conditions for a revolutionary change to establish orders. This research using a qualitative descriptive approach to describe the overview of the research objective. The findings of this research show the operation of a ride-sharing business; Go-Jek as an online company that combines benefits to people in terms of accessibility, economic activity and flexibility. However, there are some divisions in the principle of economic sharing that have not yet implemented, which have led to the failure of local governments to regulate economic business sharing in the province of Yogyakarta.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] B. Cohen and J. Kietzmann, “Ride On! Mobility Business Models for the Sharing Economy,” Organization & Environment, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 279–296, 2014.

[2] A. Y. Haladi and Aisyaturrahmi, “Pengaruh Kualitas Layanan Terhadap Kepuasan Pelanggan Jasa Transportasi Gojek Di Kota Surabaya,” An-Nisbah Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, vol. 5, no. 1, 2018.

[3] A. A. Azzuhri and U. G. Mada, “A Creative, Innovative, and Solutive Transportation for Indonesia with Its Setbacks and How to Tackle Them: A Case Study of the Phenomenal GOJEK,” 2018.

[4] A. Venera and V. Tselentis, “Designing the Model of Public Value Management,” Management Innovation and Competitiveness Advantage, pp. 74–80, 2015.

[5] A. J. A. Hendryanti, “Pengaruh Angkutan Online terhadap Angkutan Umum di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta,” e-journal UAJY, 2018.

[6] E. Purnomo, “Pengemudi minta Pergub Taksi Online di Yogyakarta dibatalkan,” 2017. Online: https://www.merdeka.com/peristiwa/pengemudi-minta-pergub-taksi-online-di-yogyakarta-dibatalkan.html. (Accessed: 14-Dec-2018).

[7] S. R. Miller, “First Principles for Regulating the Sharing Economy,” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2015.

[8] D. Selloni, “New Forms of Economies: Sharing Economy, Collaborative Consumption, Peer-to-Peer Economy,” in CoDesign for Public-Interest Services. Springer International Publishing, pp. 15–26, 2017.

[9] M. Schmalstich, “Sharing Economy’s Pattern,” 2018. Online: https://bmtoolbox.net/patterns/sharing-economy/. (Accessed: 08-Oct-2018).

[10] M. Yotawut, “Examining progress in research on public value,” Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 168–173, 2018.

[11] D. Hay and C. Cordery, “The value of public sector audit: Literature and history,” Journal of Accounting Literature, vol. 40, pp. 1–15, 2018.

[12] D. Chung and D. A. Hensher, “Public private partnerships in the provision of tolled roads: Shared value creation, trust and control,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 118, pp. 341–359, 2018.

[13] T. T. Marie, “Public values as essential criteria for public entrepreneurship: Water management in France,” Utilities Policy, vol. 40, pp. 162–169, 2016.

[14] D. Bromell, “Creating public value in the policy advice role: a reflection from the front line,” Policy Quarterly, vol. 8, no. 4, 2012.

[15] S. Yunus, S. Zainal, and F. Jalil, “Social Network, Trust and Collective Action of Aceh Farmers in Increasing Welfare,” International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, vol. 24, Special Issue 2, pp. 184–192, Apr. 2020.

[16] A. Nurmandi and E. P. Purnomo, “Making the strategic plan work in local government: A case study of strategic plan implementation in Yogyakarta Special Province (YSP),” International Review of Public Administration, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 143–164, 2011.

[17] — (Missing reference in original list; left blank).

[18] C. J. Martin, “The sharing economy: A pathway to sustainability or a nightmarish form of neoliberal capitalism?,” Ecological Economics, vol. 121, pp. 149–159, 2016.

[19] C. Mortreux et al., “Political economy of planned relocation: A model of action and inaction in government responses,” Global Environmental Change, vol. 50, pp. 123–132, 2018.

Downloads

Published

05.06.2020

How to Cite

E.P. PURNOMO, MIA, R., & DYAH , M. (2020). Analysis of Government Regulation’s Response on Sharing Principles . International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(10), 1760-1773. https://doi.org/10.61841/jxb40503