Attachment’s Impact on the “Day Care” Children Initiative and Creativity in Bandung

Authors

  • Syahnur Rahman Departemen Psikologi, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia Author
  • Eries Dhycohianessa Departemen Psikologi, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia Author
  • Engkos Kosasih Departemen Psikologi, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia Author
  • Yuni Irani Departemen Psikologi, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/5vvmcn40

Keywords:

attachment, initiative, creativity, day care children

Abstract

Childhood is a period that has been disjointed from the period of dependence as a baby and becomes more independent. At this time the part of parents is very influential in the development of initiative and creativity of children. The aim of this study was to investigate the attachment impact on the “Day Care” children initiative and creativity in Bandung. This study has already activated to 40 children of day care (their ages were among about 3-5 years-old) based on sampling quota. The research method was a quantitative method with a questionnaire and scale instrument as the instruments. The data analysis was used Spearman correlation and multiple regression analysis. Based on the investigations, the conclusion submitted there is influence attachment to the initiative and creativity of children. The attachment has a greater influence on initiative compared to the creativity of day care children in Bandung.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Kelly, S. R. (2017). The School Psychologist’s Role in Leading Multidisciplinary School-Based Threat Assessment Teams. Contemporary School Psychology, 1–11.

2. Allodi, M. W. (2010). Goals and values in school: a model developed for describing, evaluating and changing the social climate of learning environments. Social Psychology of Education, 13(2), 207–235.

3. Osborne, J. W., & Jones, B. D. (2011). Identification with Academics and Motivation to Achieve in School: How the Structure of the Self Influences Academic Outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 131–158.

4. Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and Loss, Vol. 3: Loss: Sadness and Depression. Hogarth Press.

5. Prior, V., & Glaser, D. (2006). Understanding Attachment and Attachment Disorders: Theory, Evidence and Practice. Jessica Kingsley.

6. Ubha, N., & Cahill, S. (2014). Building Secure Attachments for Primary School Children: A Mixed Methods Study. Educational Psychology in Practice, 30(3), 272–292.

7. Schaffer, H. R., & Emerson, P. F. (1964). The Development of Social Attachments in Infancy. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 29(94).

8. Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1967). Infancy in Uganda: Infant Care and the Growth of Love. Johns Hopkins University Press.

9. Klijn, M., & Tomic, W. (2010). A Review of Creativity within Organizations from a Psychological Perspective. Journal of Management Development, 29(4), 322–343.

10. Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293–321.

11. Amabile, T. M., et al. (1996). Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5).

12. Burleson, W., & Selker, T. (2002). Creativity and Interface. Communications of the ACM, 45(10), 89–90.

13. Gaspersz, J. B. R. (2005). Compete with Creativity. Innovation Lecture, Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs.

14. Henker, N., Sonnentag, S., & Unger, D. (2015). Transformational Leadership and Employee Creativity. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(2), 235–247.

15. Hood, A. C., Cruz, K. S., & Bachrach, D. G. (2017). Conflicts with Friends… Journal of Business and Psychology, 32(1), 73–86.

16. Vezzani, C., Vettori, G., & Pinto, G. (2017). University Students’ Conceptions of Learning Across Multiple Domains. European Journal of Psychology of Education.

17. Diakidoy, I. N. (1998). Reading comprehension and word meaning acquisition. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 13(2), 131–154.

18. Mayer, R. E. (1999). Fifty Years of Creativity Research. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.) Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge University Press.

19. Hu, X., & Kaplan, S. (2015). Unconsciously Derived Affect on Task Satisfaction. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(1).

20. Kim, T., Lee, D., & Wong, N. Y. S. (2016). Supervisor Humor and Employee Outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31(1), 125–139.

21. Zhang, W., et al. (2017). Job Autonomy, Engagement, and Creativity. Journal of Business and Psychology, 32(3), 235–251.

22. Sternberg, R. J. (1988). A Three-Facet Model of Creativity. In The Nature of Creativity.

23. Amabile, T. M. (1983). The Social Psychology of Creativity. Springer-Verlag.

24. Smith, D. K., Paradice, D. B., & Smith, S. M. (2000). Prepare Your Mind for Creativity. Communications of the ACM, 43(7).

25. Franken, R. E. (2006). Human Motivation. Wadsworth.

26. Magyari-Beck, I. (1996). The Torrance Phenomenon. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 411–414.

27. Abreu-Lima, I. M. P., et al. (2013). Predicting Child Outcomes from Preschool Quality in Portugal. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(2), 399–420.

28. Kuittinen, M., Merilainen, M., & Raty, H. (2014). Professional Competences of Young Psychologists. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 29(1), 63–80.

29. Bergeron, D. M., Schroeder, T. D., & Martinez, H. A. (2014). Proactive Personality at Work. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 71–86.

30. Mendes, S. A., et al. (2017). Professional Practices in Portuguese School Psychology. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 32(2), 251–269.

31. Kosir, K., & Tement, S. (2014). Teacher–Student Relationship and Academic Achievement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 29(3), 409–428.

32. Korotaeva, E. V., & Svyattseva, A. V. (2016). Initiative Development in Preschool Children. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 233, 280–286.

33. Cao, X., et al. (2017). DSM-5 PTSD Symptom Structure in Adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 45(4), 803–814.

34. Abdelmoteleb, S. A. (2018). Job Stress and Organizational Commitment. Journal of Business and Psychology.

35. Munandar, U. S. C. (1999). Creativity and Giftedness. PT Gramedia Pustaka.

36. Skiba, T., & Wildman, J. L. (2018). Trust in Supervisor–Subordinate Relationships. Journal of Business and Psychology.

37. Costigan, R. D., et al. (2006). Employee Trust of the Supervisor and Enterprising Behavior. Journal of Business and Psychology, 21(2), 273–291.

Downloads

Published

30.05.2020

Issue

Vol. 24 No. 10 (2020): 24 (10) 2020

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

How to Cite

Rahman, S., Dhycohianessa, E., Kosasih, E., & Irani , Y. (2020). Attachment’s Impact on the “Day Care” Children Initiative and Creativity in Bandung. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(10), 1481-1491. https://doi.org/10.61841/5vvmcn40