NUTRIENT POTENTIAL OF Coix Lachryma-Jobi L. AS RUMINANT FEED SOURCE IN EAST KALIMANTAN

Authors

  • Hamdi Mayulu Faculty of Agriculture, Mulawarman University, Campus Gunung Kelua, Samarinda 75119, East Kalimantan, Indonesia Author
  • Taufan Purwokusumaning Daru Faculty of Agriculture, Mulawarman University, Campus Gunung Kelua, Samarinda 75119, East Kalimantan, Indonesia Author
  • Suyadi Faculty of Agriculture, Mulawarman University, Campus Gunung Kelua, Samarinda 75119, East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Author
  • Marry Christiyanto Diponegoro University, Kampus drh. Soejono Koesoemowardoyo Semarang, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/rhwdb226

Keywords:

Potency, nutrient, Coix lachryma-jobi, feed, ruminant

Abstract

Increasing population and productivity are alternative policies that must be implemented comprehensively in East Kalimantan by applying the concept of feed forage budgeting. Utilization of superior forage through exploration of local resource to find new feed source is a necessity. The objective of this research was to determine the nutrient composition, dry matter digestibility (DMD) and organic matter digestibility (OMD) of Coix lachryma-jobi. This research was conducted at Laboratory of Animal Nutrient Science, Faculty of Animal Science and Agriculture, Diponegoro University, Semarang by using proximate analysis and in vitro method. The result showed that Coix lachryma-jobi contained of MC (13.27%); DM (86.73%); CP (8.10%); EE (0.89%); CF (21.29%) and ash (12.08%). The stem contained of MC (12.95%); DW (87.05%); CP (7.94%); EE (0.96%); CF (24.11%) and ash (11.26%). The bran contained of MC (11.53%); DM (88.47%); CP (12.55%); EE (6.40%); CF (60.78%) and ash (8.74%).The DMD of leaves was 59.56%; OMD of leaves was 38.22%; DMD of stem was 51.77% and OMD of stem was 34.41%. This showed that Coix lacryma-jobi L. is potential to be used for ruminant feed source especially for ration combined with other feed sources through the application of feed processing technology (hay, silage, amofer, complete feed). Effective biomass utilization could provide continue and sustainable feed source thus it can meet the needs of ruminant and give additional economic advantages.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Alijosius, S., Svirmickas, G. J., Kliseviciute, V., Gruzauskas, R., Sasyte, V., Stupeliene, A. R., Dauksiene, A., & Dailidaviciene, J. (2016). The chemical composition of different barley varieties grown in Lithuania. Vet Med Zoot, 73(95), 9–13.

2. Amanzougarene, Z., Yuste, S., & Fondevila, M. (2020). Fermentation pattern of several carbohydrate sources incubated in an in vitro semicontinuous system with inocula from ruminants fed forage or concentrate-based diets. Animals, 10, 261:1–14.

3. Animal Nutrition Group. (2012). Nutritive value of commonly available feeds and fodder in India. National Dairy Development Board.

4. AOAC. (1990). Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, USA.

5. Chen, J. H., Hsu, H. Y., & Chiang, W. (2012). Allergic immune-regulatory effects of adlay bran in OVA-immunized mice. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 50, 3808–3813.

6. Dey, A., & Mukherjee, A. (2015). Tribal livestock husbandry and ethnobotanical survey for fodder plants. Research Journal of Medicinal Plant, 9(3), 105–115.

7. ECHO Asia Seed Fact Sheet. (2013). Coix lacryma-jobi. Available at: http://www.plantnames.unimelb.edu.au/Sorting/Coix.html#lacrimajobi

8. Fu, Y. H., Yang, C., Meng, Q., Liu, F., Shen, G., Zhou, M., & Ao, M. (2019). Genetic diversity of Coix lacryma-jobi L. International Journal of Genomics, 2019, 1–9.

9. Garcia, U. A. G., Corona, L., Pineda, F. C., Balcells, J., Ortega, O. C., & Ronquillo, M. G. (2018). Processed sorghum grain comparison. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 46(1), 1–9.

10. Getabalew, M., & Alemneh, T. (2019). Biotechnology applications in livestock feed improvement. Arch Biomed Eng & Biotechnol, 1(5), 1–7.

11. Heuze, V., Tran, G., Riverdin, S. G., Renaudeau, D., Bastianelli, D., & Lebas, F. (2015). Sorghum by-product. Available at: http://www.feedipedia.org/node/752

12. Irawanto, R., Lestari, D. A., & Hendrian, R. (2017). Seeds, germination, and potential of Coix lacryma-jobi L. Pros Sem Nas Masy Biodiv Indon, 3(1), 147–153.

13. Jampeetong, A., Konnerup, D., Piwpuan, N., & Brix, H. (2013). Effects of nitrogen and pH on Coix lacryma-jobi L. Aquatic Botany, 111, 144–149.

14. Juhaeti, T. (2015). Productivity of Jali under various fertilization doses. Berita Biologi, 14(2), 163–168.

15. Khongjeamsiri, W., Wangcharoen, W., Pimpilai, S., & Daengprok, W. (2011). Development of Job’s tears ice cream. Maejo Int. J. Sci. Technol, 5(3), 390–400.

16. Kim, S. O., et al. (2004). Hypolipidemic effects of adlay seed extract. Life Sciences, 75, 1391–1404.

17. Kulamarva, A. G., Sosle, V. R., & Raghavan, G. S. V. (2009). Nutritional and rheological properties of sorghum. International Journal of Food Properties, 12, 55–69.

18. Li, P. C., Tsai, W. H., & Chien, C. T. (2013). Monascus adlay supplements and pulmonary health. Food Chemistry, 136, 765–774.

19. Lu, X., et al. (2013). Polysaccharide fraction of adlay seed and cancer cell apoptosis. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 430, 846–851.

20. Liao, Y. L., Lin, W. S., & Chen, S. Y. (2019). ‘Taichung no. 5’: A high-yield Job’s tears cultivar. HortScience, 54(4), 761–762.

21. Mabjeesh, S. J., Cohen, M., & Arieli, A. (2000). In vitro dry matter digestibility methods. Journal of Dairy Science, 83(10), 2289–2294.

22. Makkar, H. P. S. (2004). Advances in in vitro gas method for feed evaluation. Assessing Quality and Safety of Animal Feeds, 55–88.

23. Malalantang, S. S., et al. (2019). Agronomic characteristics of sorghum from radiation mutations. IOP Conf. Series: EES, 399, 1–7.

24. Malik, T. A., et al. (2018). Maize wet milling by-products in ruminant feeding. International Journal of Livestock Research, 8(9), 1–11.

25. Mayulu, H., & Daru, T. P. (2019). Animal husbandry development policy. Journal of Tropical AgriFood, 1(2), 49–60.

26. Mayulu, H. (2019). Technology in Ruminants Feeds. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

27. Mayulu, H., Fauziah, N. R., Haris, M. I., Christiyanto, M., & Sunarso. (2018). Digestibility and fermentation of local feed for sheep. Animal Production, 20(2), 95–102.

28. Mayulu, H. (2015). Cattle Feed and Fattening Business Efficiency. Unnes Press.

29. Mayulu, H., & Suhardi. (2015). Nutrient potency of rice straw processed with amofer. Internat. J. Sci. Eng, 9(2), 101–105.

30. Mayulu, H. (2014). Nutrient digestibility of sheep fed amofer palm oil byproducts. Internat. J. Sci. Eng, 7(2), 106–111.

31. Mayulu, H., Sunarso, C. I. Sutrisno, & Sumarsono. (2013). Intake and digestibility of fermented rice straw-based feed. Internat. J. Sci. Eng, 4(2), 86–91.

32. Mayulu, H., Sunarso, Sutrisno, C. I., & Sumarsono. (2010). Beef cattle development policy in Indonesia. Jurnal Litbang Pertanian, 29(1), 34–41.

33. Mayulu, B., Suryanto, Sunarso, Christiyanto, M., Ballo, F. I., & Refa’i. (2009). Feasibility of complete feed based on ammoniated rice straw. J. Indon. Trop. Anim. Agric, 34(1), 74–80.

34. Mikkelson, K. (2017). Feed options for ruminants in the tropics. ECHO Asia Notes.

35. Nurmala, T. (2010). Development of Coix lacryma-jobi L. as nutritious food. PANGAN, 20(1), 41–48.

36. Ruminta, Y., Yuwariah, Y., & Sabrina, N. (2017). Growth and yield response of Job’s tears. Jurnal Agrikultura, 28(2), 82–89.

37. Sariubang, M., & Herniwati. (2011). Corn biomass as animal feed. Seminar Nasional Serealia, 237–244.

38. Sirappa, M. P. (2003). Sorghum development in Indonesia. Jurnal Litbang Pertanian, 22(4), 133–140.

39. Suarni, & Firmansyah, I. U. (2016). Structure and nutrient composition of sorghum. Available at: http://balitsereal.litbang.pertanian.go.id

40. Tilley, J. M. A., & Terry, R. A. (1963). Two-stage technique for in vitro forage digestion. Journal of the British Grassland Society, 18, 104–111.

41. Umiyasih, U., & Wina, E. (2008). Corn by-products as ruminant feed. WARTAZOA, 18(3), 127–136.

42. Wild, K. J., Steinga, H., & Rodehutscord, M. (2019). Ruminal fermentation of microalgae. GCB Bioenergy, 11, 345–359.

43. Wulandari, E., Sihombing, F. S. P., Sukarminah, E., & Sunyoto, M. (2019). Functional properties of red sorghum protein isolate. Chimica et Natura Acta, 7(1), 14–19.

44. Yang, H., Min, W., Bi, P., Zhou, H., & Huang, F. (2013). Coix lacryma-jobi oil effects on Ganoderma lucidum. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 76, 77–82.

45. Yu, F., Gao, J., Zeng, Y., & Liu, C. X. (2008). Coix seed extract inhibition of fatty acid synthase. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 119, 252–258.

Downloads

Published

30.05.2020

Issue

Vol. 24 No. 10 (2020): 24 (10) 2020

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

How to Cite

Mayulu, H., Daru, T. P., Suyadi, & Christiyanto, M. (2020). NUTRIENT POTENTIAL OF Coix Lachryma-Jobi L. AS RUMINANT FEED SOURCE IN EAST KALIMANTAN. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(10), 1460-1470. https://doi.org/10.61841/rhwdb226