Situating English Language Teaching in India within the Framework of Post Method Pedagogy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/182wd007Keywords:
Methods, Post Methods, LOCF, Eurocentric, ELTAbstract
The horizontal expansion and vertical percolation of English language in India has been uneven primarily because of the lack of concerted efforts by the different stake holders. One of the main reasons has been the unfiltered imposition of Anglo American or Eurocentric teaching methods for the teaching of English which have failed to produce the desired results. The use of imported methods has not only sidelined the teachers but has also taken the whole teaching learning process as its hostage. Consequently unlike urban areas where due to the exposure to media and social networking, students are relatively proficient in the use of English, the students of the rural and tribal areas in India are having a very low proficiency in English which becomes a main cause of their exclusion from the higher education and the job market. The marginalization of the indigenous educational traditions and practices and promotion of the western educational traditions without any scrutiny has put the teaching and learning of English in India at the cross roads. The University Grants Commission of India in its Learning Outcome based Curriculum Framework (LOCF) of English also advocates use of local resources and teacher innovation for the teaching of English in India. Keeping the unproductive use of method oriented pedagogy in India and the recommendations of LOCF in mind, the present paper builds a case for using Post Method pedagogy which unlike the so called methods is a bottom up approach and is based on the experiential knowledge of the practicing teachers and takes the local social, cultural , administrative and educational exigencies into consideration.
Downloads
References
Akbari, R. (2008). Postmethod Discourse and Practice. TESOL Quarterly, 42/4. 641–52. Andon, N. and Leung, C. (2013) The role of approaches and methods in second language teacher education, in Ben Said, S. and Zhang, L. (eds) Language Teachers and Teaching:
Global Perspectives, Local Initiatives. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis. Apple, M. (1986). Teachers and texts: A political economy of class and gender relations in education. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul BBC News: www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-inia-24997219.amp
CDC Report.1989. Report of the UGC Curriculum Development Centre for English. New Delhi. University Grants Commission.
Clarke, M. (1994). The dysfunctions of theory/practice discourse. TESOL
Quarterly 28.1, 9–26.
GOI (Government of India). (2007). Report of the National Knowledge Commission.
New Delhi: GOI. Available online at www.knowledgecommission.gov.in
Graddol, D. (2010). English Next India. New Delhi: British Council.
Johnson, K.E. (2016). Language Teacher Education, in G. Hall (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of English Language Teaching. London: Routledge. 121-134.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond Methods: Macrostrategies for Language Teaching. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding Language Teaching: From Method to Postmethod. Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2012). Language Teacher Education for a Global Society. London: Routledge NCERT (National Council of Educational Research and Training). (2006). National Focus Group Position Paper on Teaching of English. New Delhi: NCERT.
NEWS 18: www.news18.com/news/india/amartyas-message-to-mulayam-mind-your
language-314130.html. Nunan, D. (1991). Language Teaching Methodology. New York: Prentice Hall
Pennycook, A. (1989). The Concept of Method, Interested Knowledge, and the Politics
of Language Teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 23/4: 589–618.
Pennycook, A. (2004). History: After 1945, in M. Byram (ed.) Routledge Encyclopedia of Language Teaching and Learning. London: Routledge. 275–82.
Richards, J., & Rodgers, T. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching . New York: Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.