Modern Psycho-Aesthetic Discussion of O‘Neill‘s Strange Interlude
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/t2j9cy42Keywords:
Aesthetic Negation, Eugene O’Neill, Strange Interlude, Theodor Adorno,, Truth Content, Jacques Lacan, Real OrderAbstract
Tragedy in modern American drama is preoccupied with the study of creativity and loss, as the two prove strong solidarity in aesthetic discussions. Adorno recognizes certain unbalanced relationships between nature (modern society) and an individual as the ultimate source of suffering, central to an understanding of aesthetic expression. Whereas, art endeavors to transcend its inherent experience of suppression and pain through negating the reality of loss; Adorno’s Truth Content associates itself with a non-discursive form of experience that refers to the transient nature of truth, compromising a self-reflexive, propositional and subjective nature, to which all aesthetic questions terminate. Correspondingly, in psychoanalytic debates, Jacques Lacan develops his theory based on unconscious operations and transient essence of meaning in different contexts. Lacan introduces the Imaginary Order, the Symbolic Order and the Real Order, as concerned with the haunting experiences of loss in unconscious and the concept of objet petit a, so as to ponder on the uninterpretable and unattainable existential domains. The Real Order resists the Imaginary and the Symbolic, claiming to have existed beyond language and prior to all, in a way that no media can embody the Real; it can only point to the Real. Since the Truth Content and the Real Order are attached to the experience of loss and repressed desires, Eugene O’Neill seems to utilize aesthetic negation to study a new form of autobiographical realism, interested in unmasking the multilayered reality. Accordingly, for the first time in the history of psycho-aesthetic studies, the present research aims to provide a fluid psychological analysis of Eugene O’Neill’s heroin, originated from the Real Order so as to reveal the reason beyond her romantic negations and to ponder on the degree to which Lacanian Real Order contributes to Theodor Adorno’s concept of Truth Content in modern drama.
Downloads
References
[1] Adorno, Theodor W. Aesthetic Theory. Translated by R. Hullot-Kentor, University of Minnesota Press, 1997.
[2] Czekaj, Rafał. ―Adorno and practically useless art, or autonomy instead of the avant-garde.‖ Art Inquiry. Recherches sur les arts, vol. XIX, 2017, pp. 121-130.
[3] Fathima, Sabreen. ―The Influence of Psychoanalysis Theory on Eugene O‘Neill.‖ The Indian Review of World Literature in English, vol. 9, no. 2, 2012, pp. 1-6.
[4] Flodin, Camilla. ―The wor(l)d of the animal. Adorno on art's expression of suffering.‖ Journal of Aesthetics & Culture, Vol. 3: 1, 2011: 1-12.
[5] Habib, M.A.R. Literary Criticism: from Plato to the Present. Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.
[6] Hullot-Kentor, Robert. Things beyond Resemblance: collected essays on Theodor W. Adorno. Columbia University Press, 2006.
[7] Karim, Asim and Riaz Butt, Nasim. ―Creativity, Psychoanalysis and Eugene O‘Neill‘s Creative Process.‖ A biannual publication on the study of language and literature, vol. 13, no. 2, 2011, pp. 236-248.
[8] Lijster, Thijs. Benjamin and Adorno on Art and Art Criticism. The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press, 2017.
[9] Macardle, Dorothy. ―The Dual Nature of Man (1934).‖ Eugene O Neill's Critics: Voices from Abroad, edited by Frenz, Horst and Tuck, Susan. Southern Illinois University Press, 1984.
[10] McPherson, Alan. The memory and expectation of aesthetics: A study of Adorno’s Aesthetic Theory. 2009. Middlesex University, PhD dissertation.
[11] Okiji, Fumi. Jazz As Critique; Adorno and Black Expression Revisited. Stanford University Press, 2018.
[12] O‘Neill, Eugene. Strange Interlude. Boni & Liveright, 1928.
[13] Pizzato, M. Edges of loss: From modern drama to postmodern theory. The University of Michigan Press, 1998.
[14] Ross, Nathan. The Philosophy and Politics of Aesthetic Experience: German Romanticism and Critical Theory. Palgrave, 2017.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
