Congestion Control Using TFC and TFR In Common Channel Signaling System#7 (SS7) At Message Transfer Part-Level 3

Authors

  • K. Prabhakar ECE department, Malla Reddy College of Engineering Hyderabad, India Author
  • Dr. P. John Paul ECE department, Malla Reddy College of Engineering Hyderabad, India Author
  • Dr. P. John Paul ECE department, HKBKCE Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/s511np05

Keywords:

Congestion Control, Transfer Control, Transfer Restricted Mechanism, Signaling System Number 7, Common Chanel Signaling #7, Secured Tracking Devices

Abstract

Signalling refers to the exchange of information between the call components required to maintain and provide the call service. The communication between telephones-switches in public telephone networks with different set of protocols are known as Signalling System Number 7 (SS7 or CCS#7). The function of SS7 are call control, maintenance capabilities based on office telephone network and network management remotely. The telephone networks are vulnerable to attacks and congestion occurring in the telecommunication. In telecommunication network( BSNL concerning) a failure of links and exchanges i.e, out of service of links and outage of exchanges. In addition, congestion situations may cause failure of single links. Therefore, to avoid such problems, “Congestion Control at MTP-L3 (Message Transfer Part-Layer3)” is used for controlling the traffic occurring at the MTP-L3 layer using Transfer Control (TFCs) and transfer restricted mechanism (TFRs). The “Secured Tracking Devices (STD)” is used for secured transmission of voice and data in the telecommunication by identifying the attackers. Hence, the “CC at MTP-L3 STD” methodology provides better results by varying Number of nodes and energy consumption of existing “STD without TFCs/TFRs. The route reliability increases with decrease in network lifetime, end-to-end delay and Congestion Control.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Mishra, S. & Modi, N. (2014). GSM Mobile Authentication Based on User SIM. IJCST, 2, 121–125.

[2] Jøsang, A., Miralabé, L. & Dallot, L. (2015). Vulnerability by Design in Mobile Network Security. Journal of Information Warfare, 14(4), 85–111.

[3] Manoharan, Rajesh, et al. (2020). Selection of Intermediate Routes for Secure Data Communication Systems using Graph Theory Application and Grey Wolf Optimization Algorithm in MANETs. IET Networks.

[4] Rajesh, M. & Gnanasekar, J. M. (2017). Path Observation Based Physical Routing Protocol for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 97, 1267–1289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4565-9

[5] Rajesh, M. (2020). Streamlining Radio Network Organizing Enlargement Towards Microcellular Frameworks. Wireless Personal Communications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07336-9

[6] Kuhn, D. R. (1997). Sources of Failure in the Public Switched Telephone Network. Computer, 30(4), 31–36.

[7] Saxena, N. & Payal, A. (2011). Enhancing Security System of Short Message Service for M-Commerce in GSM. International Journal of Computer Science & Engineering Technology, 2(4), 126–133.

[8] Tarkaa, N. S. & Ani, C. I. Design of Cost-effective Synthetic IP Backbone Network Topology for a Developing Economy.

[9] Lam, D. N. (2011). Defining Quantiles for Estimating IP Packet Delay Variation in NGN Core Networks. REV Journal on Electronics and Communications, 1(03).

[10] Almughaless, A. A. & Alsaih, A. M. (2010). Next Generation Network Design, Dimensioning & Services Innovation. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 10(6), 191–198.

[11] Syed, M. & Ambore, I. Y. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF OSPF AND RIP ON IPV4 & IPV6 TECHNOLOGY USING G.711 CODEC.

[12] Obiniyi, A. A., Soroyewun, M. B. & Abur, M. M. (2014). New Innovations in Performance Analysis of Computer Networks: A Review. International Journal of Applied Information Systems, 6.

[13] Joung, J., Choi, J., Min, S., Son, S., Kim, Y., Song, J., Kim, Y. B. & Kim, C. S. (2013). A Flow Admission Control in Next Generation Networks with Flow Aggregate Information Exchange. Telecommunication Systems, 52(2), 363–374.

[14] Von Solms, R. & Van Niekerk, J. (2013). From Information Security to Cyber Security. Computers & Security, 38, 97–102.

[15] Ahamed, S. S. (2009). Performance Analysis of Signaling System 7 (SS7) Network and Protocols to Provide Call Control, Remote Network Management and Maintenance Capabilities. Journal of Theoretical & Applied Information Technology, 5(2).

[16] Sharma, G. & Mittal, H. SS7 Signaling Protocol – Security.

[17] Rufa, G. (2007). Developments in Telecommunications with a Focus on SS7 Network Reliability. Springer. ISBN: 978-3-540-74985-1.

[18] Kumar, V. (2019). Nusselt Number and Friction Factor Correlations of Three Sides Concave Dimple Roughened Solar Air Heater. Renewable Energy, 135, 355–377.

[19] Kumar, V. & Prasad, L. (2017). Experimental Analysis of Heat Transfer and Friction for Three Sides Roughened Solar Air Heater. Annales de Chimie - Science des Matériaux, 41(1–2), 75–107.

[20] Buttler, M. A., Nasby, R. D. & Quinn, R. K. (1976). Solid State Communications, 19, 1011.

[21] Ravindranathan Thampi, K., Reddy, T. V., Ramakrishnan, V. & Kuriacose, J. C. (1981). Abstracts of X International Conference on Photochemistry, Greece; Published in J. Photochem., 17(1–2), 183.

Downloads

Published

29.05.2020

How to Cite

K. Prabhakar, Paul, P. J., & kumar, B. (2020). Congestion Control Using TFC and TFR In Common Channel Signaling System#7 (SS7) At Message Transfer Part-Level 3. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(10), 1309-1321. https://doi.org/10.61841/s511np05