Investigating the Effect of Women's Personality Type on the purchase intention (Approach: Women Archetypes)

Authors

  • Faezeh Hedayat Nazari Ph.D. Business-Marketing Management, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran Iran Author
  • Nazanin Teimouri Ph.D. Human Resource Management, Kharazmi University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. Author
  • Ahmad Darvish Narenjbon Bachelor of International Transportation Services Management, University of Science and Technology Chamber of Commerce, Industries, Mines and Agriculture of Iran. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/gym0cy74

Keywords:

Personality Type, Archetype, Female Goddess, Purchase intention, Brand Image, Product, Product Knowledge., Involvement

Abstract

Today, one of the most important and decisive issues in the success of companies' marketing activities is to know more consumers so that they can maintain the attractiveness of their product to the market. The issue of how to create different preferences in the consumer is related to different motivations and their personalities. Jung recognized the generality and repetition of the characters and events of human life and called these universal events “myths” and “archetypes” The archetype or goddesses are the powerful and invisible forces that shape the behavior and emotions of women. Recognition of these inner forces opens a new frontier for raising women's awareness. By knowing which goddess is the dominant force of the inner personality, one can achieve one's special instincts, priorities and abilities, as well as insight into women's lives. Therefore, the use of archetypes can be a good platform for effectively shaping consumers' image of products, as well as understanding the decision- making behavior and purchase intention them. Accordingly, the present study was conducted with the aim of better understanding consumers and studying personality traits through different types of eternal faces in women to be able to analyze the different tendencies of different groups and make suggestions in the area of influencing consumer-purchasing behavior. In this study, feminine archetypes include: “Artemis”, “Athena”, “Hastia”, “Hera”, “Demeter”, “Persephone” and “Aphrodite”, which are considered as dimensions of the personality type and based on those hypotheses were identified and the effect of different personality types on the individual's attitude toward product involvement, product knowledge and brand image on the desire to buy products -women's clothing of “Holiday” production group was investigated. The sample studied in this study were 389 consumers of “Holiday” products in Tehran who were selected by cluster sampling from ten main “Holiday” stores. The personality type of the respondents was measured using the “Shinoda Bolen” questionnaire and also their attitudes toward the studied variables were measured using a questionnaire based on a five-option Likert scale. Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the questionnaire was calculated to be 0.773, which has a high validity. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS software and statistical tests including: one-factor variance, ANOVA, Fisher, and regression were used. Findings from the test of research hypotheses showed that consumers with different personality types have significant differences in terms of product involvement, product knowledge, and purchase intention the product. Based on these differences, the company was advised to carry out its marketing plans in a way that was tailored to their individual eternal form to attract the attention of different personality types.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Amir Aghdaei, Seyed Fathollah, Honari, Roya, 2012, "Study of the impact of brand role in the formation of product involvement", International Journal of Management and Business Research, 2012, No. 3.

[2] Parniani, Minoo, Parsi, Parto, 2009, Mythical Symbols of Men's Psychology, Shinoda Bolen, Ashian Publications, Tehran.

[3] Heidarzadeh, Kambiz, 2014, Consumer Behavior: Buying, Having and Being, Marketing Publications.

[4] Divandari. Ali et al., 2009, "Improving Customer-Based Brand Equity by Creating an Idea of Functional and Non-Functional Advantages", Business Management Perspective, No. 30.

[5] Sargolzaei, Sara, 2014, Applied Jungology, Culture of Life Foundation, Tehran.

[6] Saleh Ardestani, Abbas, Saadi, Mohammad Reza, 2013, "Consumer Behavior (Internal and External Factors)", Third Edition, Aylar Publishing, Tehran.

[7] Mahmoudi Meymand, Mohammad et al., 2012, "Personality Dimensions of Myers-Briggs Test and Customers' Purchase Intention", Quarterly Journal of New Marketing Research, Second Year, No. 4.

[8] Yousefi, Azar, 2005, Mythical Symbols of Women Psychology, Roshangaran Publications and Women Studies, Tehran.

[9] Aaker, D.A. 1996. Building Strong Brands, the Free Press, and New York, NY.

[10] Arnould, Eric J, Price, Linda, and Zinkhan, George ,2002. “Consumers”, McGrawHill

[11] Allaway,A. Huddleston,P. Whipple,.J,2011, customer-based brand equity, equity drivers, and customer loyalty in the supermarket industry, journal of product and brand management,vol20,iss:3 pp.190-204

[12] Armstrong J. S., Morwitz V.G. and Kumar V., 2000, Sales forecasts for existing consumer products and services: Do purchase intentions contribute to accuracy?, International Journal of Forecasting, Vol. 16, pp. 383 – 397.

[13] Bennet, e.a. 1985. Meeting with Jung. Zurich: Daimon Verlag.

[14] Bian, X. and Moutinho, L.2009. “An investigation of determinants of counterfeit purchase consideration”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 62, pp. 368-78.

[15] Bettman, J.A. and Park, C.W. 1980. “Effects of prior knowledge and experience and phase of the choice process on consumer decision-making processes: a protocol analysis”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 7 No. 3, December, pp. 234-48.

[16] Bolen. J schionda, 2004. Goddess in every woman: a new psychology of women, paperback.

[17] Callimchus, 1969. To Artemis, in hymns and Epigrams, Trans. A.W. Mair, Harvrd university press.p.63

[18] Chakravarti, A. and Janiszewski, C. 2003, “The influence of macro-level motives on consideration set composition in novel purchase situations”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 30 No. 2, September, pp. 244-58.

[19] Chung, H. and Zhao, X. 2003, “Humour effect on memory and attitude: moderating role of product involvement”, International Journal of Advertising, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 117-44.

[20] Cohen Joel B, Chakravarti Dipankar, 1990. “Consumer Psychology”, Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 41

[21] De Magistris, T. and Gracia, A., (2008), “The decision to buy organic food products in Southern Italy”, British Food Journal, Vol. 110, No.9, pp.929-947.

[22] Demetrakopoulos , S. 1979, Hestia, goddess of the hearth,p.55-75

[23] Dholakia, U. M. 2001. A motivational process model of product involvement and consumer risk perception. European Journal of Marketing, 35(11/12),1340–1362.

[24] Dobni, D. and Zinkhan, G.M. 1990, “In search of brand image: a foundation analysis”, Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 110-19.

[25] Dolich, I.J. (1969), “Congruence relationships between self-images and product brands”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 6 No. 1, February, pp. 80-4.

[26] Gimbutas, M. 1982. Women and culture in Goddess-oriented old Europe, pp 22-31

[27] Hannah, B.1976.Jung: His life and work. New York: Capricorn books, G.P. Putnam’s son.

[28] Harding, M. Esther .1973. The virgin goddess, in women s mysteries, published by putnams.p.174.

[29] Hong Ilyoo B. 2015, Understanding the consumer's online merchant selection process: The roles of product involvement, perceived risk, and trust expectation , International Journal of Information Management

,Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages 322–336nt, Vol.16, 8, pp. 504-519.

[30] Humphrey, N.1984. Consciousness regained. Oxford: oxford university press.

[31] Jung, C.G.1933. Modern man in search of his soul. New York: Harvest.

[32] Jung, C.G.1985. The undiscovered self. New York: mentor books, new American library.

[33] Jung, C.G,1964, Women in Europe,Vol.10,pp113-133

[34] Kakkosa, N., Trivellasb, P. Sdroliasc. L.2014, Identifying Drivers of Purchase Intention for Private Label Brands. Preliminary Evidence from Greek Consumers. IC-SIM 2014, September 1-4, Madrid, Spain

[35] Keller, KL. 2003 “Strategic Brand Management: Best Practice Cases in Branding:Lessons from The World's Strongest Brand”, Pretice Hall.

[36] Kim J., Sung Y. 2009, Dimensions of purchase-decision involvement: Affective and cognitive involvement in product and brand. Brand Managemet

[37] Kerenyi, E.1977.Archetypal image of mother and daughter, Bollinger series.

[38] Kleine, R.E., Klein, S.S. and Kernan, J.B. 1993, “Mundane consumption and the self: a social-identity perspective”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 3 No. 3, December, pp. 327-43.

[39] Koekemoer, L. 1991, Marketing Communications Management: A South African Perspective, Butterworths, Durban.

[40] Kotler, P. 1999, Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation, and Control, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

[41] Lee, D. Galen T., Hyungil H, and Dean F.2011, Consumer values versus perceived product attributes: Relationships among items from the MVS, PRS, and PERVAL scales. Sport Management Review 14 ,pp 89–101

[42] Low George S., Charles W. Lamb Jr,2000. “The Measurement and Dimensionality of Brand Associations”,

Journal of Product & Brand Management, Vol. 9 Iss: 6

[43] Park, C. and Srinivasan, V. 1994. “A survey-based method for measuring and understanding brand equity and its extendibility”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 271-88.

[44] Puth, G., Mostert, P. and Ewing, M. 1999, “Consumer perceptions of mentioned product and brand attributes in magazine advertising”, Journal of Product & Brand Management,Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 38-49.

[45] Reagan. N, 1982, Quest, similar sentiments in Nancy with bill lobby.

[46] Robertson, Robin. 1992. Beginners guide to Jungian psychology, paperback.

[47] Solomon, M.R., 2012. Consumer bahvior: buying, having, and being,10th edition, Prentice Hall;

[48] Solomon, M.R., Surprenant, C., Czepiel, J.A. and Guttman, E.G. 1985, “A role theory perspective on dyadic interactions: the service encounter”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 49 No. 1,pp. 99-111

[49] Stockmans, M. 1991, The Relative Importance of Product Attributes: Consumer Decision Theories in New- Product Development, Delft University Press, Delft.

[50] Stone, M.1978. When god was a woman, New york: harvest Harcourt brace Jovanovich,p.228

[51] Storr, A. 1983. The essential Jung. Princeton, NJ: Princeton university press.

[52] Tom, G., Garibaldi, B., Zeng, Y. and Pilcher, J. 1998, “Consumer demand for counterfeit goods”, Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 15 No. 5, pp. 405-21.

[53] Thomas, L.1980.The backpacking woman, New York: double day. p 227.

[54] Wua,P. Yeong-Yuh Yeh ,G, Gary a, Hsiao ,2011,The effect of store image and service quality on brand image and purchase intention for private label brands.

[55] Wehr, G. 1987. Jung: A biography. Boston: Shambhala publications.

Downloads

Published

30.06.2020

How to Cite

Nazari, F. H., Teimouri, N., & Narenjbon, A. D. (2020). Investigating the Effect of Women’s Personality Type on the purchase intention (Approach: Women Archetypes). International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(6), 18643-18659. https://doi.org/10.61841/gym0cy74