A discourse study of silence in selected political speeches
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/tfccp456Keywords:
political speeches,, communication, self- expressionAbstract
Politics is said to be a game of maneuverings and part of that is the use of silence as a means of communication. This may sound strange as communication itself connotes the art of expression. However in politics, a political figure may choose to remain silent as a means of passing a message across to the public in a trouble situation when he is expected to make a comment.
This research paper tackles that whereas this strategy works well in some instances it fails in other instances. It, therefore, recommends that politicians should be cautious in the use of strategic silence as a means of political communication in view of the nature of politics which calls for self- expression in the use of persuasion, clarification and conviction to win public support and sympathy. Maintaining silence when one is most expected to speak out could easily be misunderstood as a sign of incompetence, intransigence or outright arrogance by the public.
This research paper is divided in to three sections; the first section is an introduction to the problem, aims of the study, limits and procedures of the study. The second section introduces the concept of silence, its features, types, functions and an important theory in which is the spiral of silence. Section three contains all the conclusions the study has arrived at and the referenced used.
Downloads
References
1. Alemoh T. “Strategic Silence as a Tool of Political Communication: A
2. Reflection on Third Term Saga and Etteh Gate in Nigerian Politics”.A Journal of Contemporary Research.vol.8, no.1, 2011.pp.ii.
3. Crystal, D. (2008): A Dictionary of Phonetics and Linguistics .Blackwell Press.
4. Hatzisavvidou, S. “Disturbing Binaries in Political Thought: Silence as
5. Political Activism”. Vol.14, no.5, 2015. pp.ii.
6. Ling, W. “Communicative Functions and Meanings of Silence: An
7. Analysis of Cross Cultural Views”.pp.138-139.
Gray S. “On the Problems and Power of Silence in Democratic Theory
8. andPractice”2014.pp.7-20.
Gendron,R. “The Meanings of Silence during Conflict” .Journal of
9. Conflictology. Vol. 2, no.1, 2011 pp.1-3.
10. Ferguson, K. “Silence: A Politics” Contemporary Political Theory.
11. Trask ,L.(2007).On Language and Linguistics:Key Concepts .Blackwell.
12. Schröter, M. (2013) Silence and Concealment in Political Discourse. Amsterdam :John Benjamins Publishing Company.
13. http://communicationtheory.org/the-spiral-of-silence- theory/https://goo.gl/P8fdK2https://goo.gl/vXYUnM
14. Epstein, D. L., Bates, R., Goldstone, J., Kristensen, I., & O'Halloran, S. (2006). Democratic transitions. American journal of political science, 50(3), 551-569.
15. McCabe, A., & Whittaker, R. (2017). Genre and appraisal in CLIL history texts. Applied linguistics perspectives on CLIL, 47, 105.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
