Chick Lit as Postfeminist Disintegrated Sisterhood in Jennifer Weiner’s In Her Shoes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/t6d15p43Keywords:
Chick Lit, Gender Relations, Identity, Postfeminism, WeinerAbstract
This article examines Jennifer Weiner’s In Her Shoes as a Chick Lit novel. Chick Lit features are represented in one postfeminist characteristic. i.e., that is the focus on the individual instead of a collective sisterhood. Individual sisterhood illustrates prolific productions in feminist discourses which are multiple, contradictory, and overlap in their femininity consumerism. Some of the post-feminist premises have sometimes been exalted for being pro-feminist, while others for being anti-feminism because of celebrating an indeterminate subjectivity. The focus of this study, therefore, sheds light on the depiction of the devilish female character. Devilishness is an attribute of body appearance used in order to bridge certain psychological gaps, by substituting subjective identity which is exclusionary and perpetuates society’s traditional mentality. With an activist postfeminist discourse, the object is (body aspects) centered. To explore those aspects of postfeminists’ preoccupation with objective categories of female identity and its perpetual longing to affirm a personal subjectivity, the feeling of constant attrition will be studied. The final obliteration of female identity and its inclusive human aspects permeates the long inherited feminist code concerning women and their archetypal inferiority to men. This article, therefore, scrutinizes the myth of traditional devil women perceived by patriarchal thinking in Weiner’s In Her Shoes. Women’s devilishness is symbolically highlighted through the novel’s postfeminism’s proliferate obsession with the extrinsic features of body leading to ironic self- discovery and consequently self-expression to efface women devilish identity. This characteristic is represented in Maggie’s devilish character caused by society and the abandonment of sisters.
Downloads
References
1. Abu Jweid, A. N. A. (2016). The fall of national identity in Chinua Achebe’s Things Fall Apart. PERTANIKA, 23(5), 529–540.
2. Beauvoir, S. (1962). The Prime of Life. Cleveland: World Pub. Co.
3. Brooks, A. (1997). Postfeminisms: Feminism, Cultural Theory, and Cultural Forms. London: Routledge.
4. Christian, B. (1985). Black Feminist Criticism: Perspectives on Black Women Writers. New York: Pergamon Press.
5. Cixous, H. (1991). “Coming to Writing” and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6. Corcelli, J. (2013). “Art Without Heart: Jennifer Weiner’s In Her Shoes.” Literary Studies, 1(3), 1–40.
7. Hill Collins, P. (1991). Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge.
8. Hoy, P. C., Schor, E. H., & DiYanni, R. (1990). Women’s Voices: Visions and Perspectives. New York: McGraw-Hill.
9. Humm, M. (1986). Feminist Criticism: Women as Contemporary Critics. New York: St. Martin's Press.
10. Hunter, A., & Sellers, S. (1998). Feminist attitudes among African American women and men. Gender & Society, 12(1), 81–99.
11. Irigaray, L. (1985). This Sex Which is Not One. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
12. Jacobus, M. (1982). Is there a woman in this text? New Literary History, 14, 117–141.
13. Kelly-Gadol, J. (1977). Did Women Have a Renaissance? Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
14. Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. New York: Columbia University Press.
15. Millett, K. (2001). Mother Millett. London: Verso.
16. Moi, T. (1999). What is a Woman? And Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Murfin, R. (2000). What is feminist criticism? In Frankenstein by Mary Shelley. Boston: Bedford/St Martin’s.
18. Percy, C., & Kremer, J. (1995). Feminist identifications in a troubled society. Feminism and Psychology, 5(2), 201–222.
19. Price, J., & Shildrick, M. (1999). Feminist Theory and the Body: A Reader. New York: Routledge.
20. Rosenberg, J., & Garofalo, G. (1998). Riot girl: Revolutions from within. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 23(3), 809–841.
21. Rossi, A. (1982). Feminists in Politics. New York: Academic Press.
22. Rupp, R. (1988). Is the legacy of second-wave feminism postfeminism? Socialist Review, 1(3), 52–57.
23. Showalter, E. (1977). A Literature of Their Own: British Women Novelists from Brontë to Lessing. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24. Sinfield, A. (1994). Cultural Politics—Queer Reading. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
25. Stacey, J. (1987). Sexism by a subtler name? Postindustrial conditions and postfeminist consciousness in the Silicon Valley. Socialist Review, 17(6), 7–28.
26. Walker, A. (1983). In Search of Our Mothers’ Gardens: Womanist Prose. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
27. Walker, R. (1995). To Be Real: Telling the Truth and Changing the Face of Feminism. New York: Anchor Books.
28. Weiner, J. (2005). Souvenir.
29. Weiner, J. (2005). In Her Shoes. New York: Encore.
30. Woolf, V. (1948). The Moment, and Other Essays. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
