Curriculum Fidelity in the Secondary Education in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/rrqs1883Keywords:
Curriculum fidelity, secondary education, curriculum of 2013Abstract
It is significant that the educational plan of 2013 actualized with adequate constancy, consistency, recurrence, and force to guarantee an understudies’ dominance of the material, and to make understudies more picks up when instructors steadfastly execute the showing systems or educational plan. The objective of this study is to reveal the Torajan Teachers’ Fidelity towards the implementation of curriculum of 2013. The researcher applied of qualitative method in this research. The instrument utilized in this exploration were interview, the researcher interview the teachers by using semi-structured interview. The subjects of this research were 20 teachers in Toraja. The consequence of this study indicated that for Adherence, the educators did not follow well the methodology of the educational program of 2013 as depicted and executing all bits of the intercession in the erroneous request. It brought about by lacking preparation for the restoration educational program. For Exposure/duration, because the teacher focused on understanding of implementing the renewal curriculum, so, they need to suit the time estimation in the class, and sometimes, the time used more than the concept in lesson or vice versa. For quality of program delivery, teachers encountered of problem in teaching while observing the affective of all students. They tried to be focused on delivering the material but neglecting the affective assessment. For participant responsiveness, the students felt happy and got to be enthusiastic in the classrooms while the program running. But, in the several previous meetings, the students looked confused because the teacher seemed unsure with the implementation of that curriculum of 2013 (K13). For program differentiation, the teachers in Torajan context did not fully implement the program of curriculum of 2013, they still mixed the previous curriculum with the renewal one, Moreover, and they still used the traditional method in teaching.
Downloads
References
[1] C. J. Marsh, Key concepts for understanding curriculum, third ed. Oxon: Routledge Falmer, 2004.
[2] R. Doll, Curriculum improvement: Decision making and process. Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights: MA, 1996.
[3] D. Ahmad, "Understanding the 2013 curriculum of english teaching through the teachers ‟ and policymakers ‟ perspectives," International Journal of Enhanced Research in Educational Development (IJERED), vol. 2,
pp. 6–15, 2014.
[4] Rusman, "Curriculum implementation at elementary schools a study on “ Best practices ” done by elementary school teachers in planning , implementing , and evaluating the curriculum," Journal of Education and Practice, vol. 2, pp. 06–113, 2015.
[5] S. Suyanto, "A reflection on the implementation of a new curriculum in Indonesia: A crucial problem on school readiness," presented at the The 4th International Conference on Research, Implementation, and Education of Mathematics and Science (4th ICRIEMS), 2017.
[6] A. Madkur, "Teachers’ voices on the 2013 curriculum for english instructional activities," IJEE, v 134, 2014.
12666
[7] C. Carroll, Patterson, and W. M., S. , "A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity," Implementation Sci
vol. 2, 2007.
[8] L. Dusenbury, R. Brannigan, M. Falco, and W. B. Hansen, " A review of research on fidelity of implementation: Implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings," Health Education Research, vol. 18, pp. 237-256, 2003.
[9] S. Mihalic, The importance of implementation fidelity. Boulder, CO: Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence, 2002.
[10] E. M. Furtak, M. A. Ruiz-Primo, J. T. Shemwell, C. C. Ayala, P. R. Brandon, R. J. Shavelson, et al., "On the fidelity of implementing embedded formative assessments and its relation to student learning," Applied Measurement in Education, vol. 21, pp. 360-389, 2008.
[11] K. Pence, L. Justice, and A. Wiggins, "Preschool teachers’ fidelity in implementing a comprehensive language- rich curriculum," Language, Speech, & Hearing Services in Schools, vol. 39, pp. 329-341, 2008.
[12] D. Davis, "Fidelity of implementation, teacher perspectives and child outcomes of a literacy intervention in a head start program: A mixed methods study," 2014.
[13] A. V. Dane and B. H. Schneider, "Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: Are implementation effects out of control? ," Clinical Psychology Review, vol. 18, pp. 23-45, 1998.
[14] C. L. O’Donnell, "Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K–12 curriculum intervention research," Review of Educational Research, vol. 78, pp. 33-84, 2008.
[15] D. F. Sobol, L. A. Rohrbach, C. W. Dent, L. Gleason, B. R. Brannon, C. A. Johnson, et al., "The integrity of smoking prevention curriculum delivery," Health Education Research, vol. 4, 1989.
[16] G. H. Roehrig, R. A. Kruse, and A. Kern, "Teacher and school characteristics and their influence on curriculum implementation," ournal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 44, pp. 883–907, 2007.
[17] P. E. Adams and G. H. Krockover, "Concerns and perceptions of beginning secondary science and mathematics teachers," Science Education, vol. 81, pp. 29-50, 1997.
[18] R. D. Anderson, Study of curriculum reform. Washington, DC: US: Government Printing Office, 1996.
[19] P. Berman and M. W. McLaughlin, "Implementation of educational innovation," The Educational Forum, vol. 40, pp. 345-370, 1976.
[20] S. M. Breitenstein, L. Fogg, C. Garvey, C. Hill, B. Resnick, and D. Gross, "Measuring implementation fidelity in a community-baed parenting intervention," Nursing Research and Practice, vol. 59, pp. 158-165, 2010.
[21] M. D. Duerden and P. A. Witt, "Assessing program implementation: What is it, why it’s important, and how to do it," Journal of Extension, vol. 50, 2012.
[22] R. H. Horner, E. G. Carr, J. Halle, G. McGee, S. Odom, and M. Wolery, "The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education.," Exceptional Children, vol. 71, pp. 65–179, 2005.
[23] B. A. Wasik, M. A. Bond, and A. Hindman, "The effects of a language and literacy intervention on Head Start children and teachers," Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 98, pp. 63–74, 2006.
[24] N. B. Songer and A. W. Gotwals, Fidelity of implementation in three sequential curricular units. Montreal, Canada: School of Education The University of Michigan, 2005.
[25] N. T. Bümen and E. Çakar, "Curriculum fidelity and factors affecting fidelity in the Turkish context,"
Educational Consultancy and Research Center, vol. 14, pp. 219–228, 2014.
[26] A. Mackey and S. M. Gass, Second language research: Methodology and design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2005.
[27] J. Creswell, W. , Research design, qualitatives, quantitative, and mixed methods approcahes Fourth ed. United State of America: Sage Publications, 2014.
[28] B. K. Hamre and R. C. Pianta, Classroom environments and developmental processes: Conceptualization and measurement. . New York: NY: Routledge, 2010.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
