Comparative evaluation of salivary pH and buffering capacity of commonly available flavoured drinks in India

Authors

  • Dr. Neha Awasthi Reader, Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, School of Dental Sciences, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India Author
  • Dr. Sukhdeep Singh Prof. & Head, Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, School of Dental Sciences, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India Author
  • Dr. Nikhil Grover MDS, Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, School of Dental Sciences, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/91wgs631

Keywords:

saliva, pH, buffering capacity, dental erosion, fruit juices, soft drinks, sports drinks

Abstract

Background & objectives: There is a general perception amongst consumers that fruit flavoured drinks are essentially water with subtle flavoring. As a consequence, they are perceived as being dentally safe. However, these drinks come with a drawback as far as oral health is concerned. An increased consumption of flavoured drinks such as soft drinks, sports drinks and fruit juices is becoming noteworthy because of concern for dental erosion. The objective of this study was to measure the buffering capacity of the drinks used, and evaluate pH of saliva after intake of various flavored drinks at different time intervals.

Materials and methods: The present study included 30 subjects, 15 male and 15 female, with the mean age group of 7±1.2 years. Five flavoured drinks were used in this study, to measure the salivary pH after consumption of the drinks, and to assess the buffering capacity of each drink. The drinks used were; apple juice, Appyfizz, milk based drink, Pepsi and Gatorade. Buffering capacity of each drink was estimated by titration with sodium hydroxide. The results were tabulated and analysed statistically.

Results: Significant fall in the salivary pH was recorded for Pepsi and Gatorade groups, while the milk based drink maintained the pH of the saliva to the resting value. Therefore, milk based drinks are a safer option as compared to soft drinks, and sports drinks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Nunn JH. Prevalence of dental erosion and implications for oral health. Eur J Oral Sci. 1996; 104(2):156-61.

2. Jarvinen VK, Rytomaa II, Heinonen OP. Risk factors in dental erosion. J Dent Res. 1991; 70(6): 942-47.

3. Hunter ML, West NX, Hughes JA, Newcombe RG, Addy M. Erosion of deciduous and permanent dental hard tissue in the oral environment. J Dent. 2000; 28(4): 257–263.

4. Azrak B, Callaway A, Knozinger S, Willershausen B. Reduction of the pH values of whole saliva after the intake of apple juice containing beverages in children and adults. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2003; 1(3): 229- 236.

5. Ericsson Y. Clinical investigation of salivary buffering action. Acta Odont. Scand. 1942; 17(2): 135-68.

6. Zero DT. Etiology of dental erosion – extrinsic factors. Eur J Oral Sci. 1996; 104(2):162-77

7. Imfeld T. Dental erosion. Definition, classification and links. Euro J Oral Sci. 1996; 104(2): 151-55

8. Scheutzel P. Etiology of Dental Erosion, intrinsic factors. Eur J Oral Sci. 1996; 104(2):178-90.

9. A Lussi. Dental Erosion: from diagnosis to therapy. Monographs in Oral Science, 2006.

10. West NX, Hughes JA, Addy M. The effect of pH on the erosion of dentine and enamel by dietary acids in vitro. J Oral Rehabil 2001; 28(9): 860-64.

11. Edwards M, Creanor SL, Foye RH, Gilmour WH. Buffering capacities of soft drinks: the potential influence on dental erosion. J Oral Rehabil. 1999; 26(12): 923-27

12. Jensdottir T, Holbrook P, Nauntofte B, Buchwald C , Bardow A. Immediate erosive potential of cola drinks and orange juices. J Dent Res. 2006; 85 (3): 226-30.

13. Lussi A, Jaeggi T, Scharer S. The influence of different factors on in vitro enamel erosion. Caries Res. 1999; 27(5): 387-93

14. Jensdottir T, Bardow A, Holbrook P. Properties and modification of soft drinks in relation to their erosive potential in vitro. J Dent. 2005; 33(7):569-75.

15. Bamaise CT, Ogunbodede EO, Olusile AO, Esan TA. Erosive potential of soft drinks in Nigeria. World J. Med. Sci. 2007; 2 (2): 116-19.

16. Touyz LZG. The acidity (pH) and buffering capacity of Canadian fruit juices and dental implications. J Cand Dent Assoc. 1994; 60(5): 454-58.

17. Tenovuo J, Lagerlöf F. Saliva. In: Thylstrup A and Fejerskov O.,Textbook of clinical cariology. Copenhagen, Denmark: Munksgaard; 1994. P 17-43

18. Hughes JA, West NX, Parker DM, Braak MH, Addy M. Effects of pH and concentration of citric, malic and lactic acids on enamel, in vitro. J Dent. 2000; 28(2):257–263.

Downloads

Published

30.06.2020

How to Cite

Awasthi, N., Singh, S., & Grover, N. (2020). Comparative evaluation of salivary pH and buffering capacity of commonly available flavoured drinks in India. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(6), 12849-12860. https://doi.org/10.61841/91wgs631